Quote:


Where did the theory about him being a common thief come from?

Quote:


Millions of dollars siphoned off by respected leaders of the Muslim community, from government funds that ought to have gone to educating their own children is not baseless. It is sinister, and it takes an elaborate exercise in naivete to not suspect the most sinister motives.

The evidence is there. You just refuse to admit that it is evidence because you can concoct even more unlikely theories to explain it - eg that he is merely a common thief (despite all the money disappearing without a trace), and because you threw in the victimhood statement that it is wrong to think of sinister motives just because they happen to be highly respected Muslim community leaders siphoning off millions of dollars in government funds that should have gone to educating their own children.

Basically, anything short of the receipts from Al Qaida would be "not evidence" in your book. Have you checked the receipts yet? I'm sure they are all in order. They probably have them in the filing cabinets out the back of your local mosque. Check under "t" for terrorism.

freediver wrote on Jul 27^th, 2014 at 6:23pm:


Stop making sh!t up. No money disappeared - it went straight into the AFIC account as management fees and backdated rent. All there in the books.

You really are grasping at straws aren't you? If there was even a skerrick of substance to your claim, you would, in the absence of actual evidence of terrorist funding in this case, be illustrating clear and known links AFIC has to terrorists.

freediver wrote on Jul 27^th, 2014 at 6:23pm:


How smacking hard is it to understand FD? There is not a shred of evidence that any money went from AFIC to terrorists, and there is not a shred of evidence linking AFIC to any terrorist organisation - let alone a history of funding them.

Basically anything short of actual evidence is not "evidence" in my book - yes how unreasonable that position is. 

Funny how after extensive auditing by both state and federal government into this scandal there has been no mention of funding terrorists, or any other criminal activity. In fact Malik Fahd has had its government funding reinstated. Strange action by all authorities involved if "the evidence is there" that such criminal activity has occurred.

Better get on to the AFP FD - tell them about this evidence that "is there" - they might be interested, and as you undoubtedly know, its a crime to withhold evidence from the police.

freediver wrote on Jul 27^th, 2014 at 7:47pm:


Of course there are - how do you think the auditors identified them as "management fees" and backdated rent F_F_S??

Did you even think before writing that idiotic statement "all the money disappeared without a trace"?

freediver wrote on Jul 27^th, 2014 at 7:47pm:


Oh great, so its a smacking conspiracy now. The same guy who mocks people every second post for engaging in conspiracies.

Jesus H Christ 

You can make light of it now FD, but the eggs well and trully on your face.

Resorting to desperate conspiracy theories - wow that was the lowest I've seen you FD.

freediver wrote on Jul 28^th, 2014 at 6:58pm:



freediver wrote on Jul 27^th, 2014 at 7:47pm:

who knows?

Its retarded, whatever it is.

freediver wrote on Jul 29^th, 2014 at 7:21pm:


Of course FD - and if a whole host of agencies from both state and federal government weren't systematically engaging in a "nudge nudge wink wink" cover up conspiracy (as you explained they were), I'd be urging you to alert the authorities about this clear evidence of terrorist activity by Australia's peak muslim body.