bogarde73 wrote on Jul 26
th, 2014 at 10:44am:
It's your suggestion. I should think it's incumbent on you to explain it.
As I see it, if you reduce tax collections, govts have less resources to distribute, not more which appears to be what is required.
Actually, I was being sarcastic ... I've already explained to you why I said it
I in fact believe that reducing taxes is the wrong way to go .. thats why I disagreed with Howards tax cuts and I disagree with scraping the carbon tax and the mining tax. If anything the mining tax should be expanded to include all minerals. Our problem, despite the rhetoric of the last few years, is not with govt. spending ... spending has actually decreased. It's revenue that is the problem. I think going after pensioners and unemployed is the absolute wrong way to do it. All that does is reduce the amount of money circulating through the local community. It's like they are plugging a small hole in a dam wall by using materials from the top of the dam wall, while the other end of the dam wall has already collapsed.
that doesn't mean we waste money ... money is certainly being spent in the wrong areas , luxury items such as the PPL, should be put aside until the budget has been repaired. The real fix lies on the big end of town... scrap tax avoidance through super, stop subsidising ALL private enterprises, tax churches, close loop holes that allow mulinationals to not pay tax. Govt's (of both persuasions) won't do this because politicians rely on these industries for firstly donations to get into office and then for employment after politics.