Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 13
Send Topic Print
About those alleged "human shields" in gaza (Read 15745 times)
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #15 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 10:55am
 
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2014 at 8:57am:
The fact is Hamas is outgunned. They are militarily inferior by orders of magnitude. The only way they can keep it up is by hiding behind their mother's skirts and relying on Israel keeping the moral high ground.


You've got to be joking.

There is no moral high ground in this conflict. None.

Quote:
They actually want the Palestinian casualties, because that is what keeps the Muslims angry and supporting Hamas (Abu actually explained his support for this line of thinking in one of his more chilling moments). [...] It takes an elaborate exercise in ignoring reality to analyse it any other way.


Palestinians elected Hamas because they implemented programs for healthcare, education and other basic essentials, even with their limited resources. The overwhelming majority of their budget was used for these. That's why Palestinians supported Hamas.

Back to top
 

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49224
At my desk.
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #16 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 11:17am
 
Quote:
You've got to be joking.

There is no moral high ground in this conflict. None.


They are relying on Israel not stooping as low. They are relying on Israel not deliberately firing on civilians, as Hamas does. They are relying on the human shields working, otherwise they would not rely on human shields. If Israel applied the same policy as Hamas with it's far greater firepower, all the palestinians would be dead. Every single one. Hamas relies on their unwillingness to do so. They rely on Israel taking the higher moral ground. That is the only reason they are willing and able to prolong such a one sided conflict, with themselves as the losers.

You are making the logical fallacy of assuming because the Palestinians are losing, they must somehow have a moral claim.

Quote:
Palestinians elected Hamas because they implemented programs for healthcare, education and other basic essentials, even with their limited resources. The overwhelming majority of their budget was used for these. That's why Palestinians supported Hamas.


I was referring to Hamas. Hamas wants the ongoing suffering, because that validates further conflict. Hamas is milking the misery of the Palestinians to further their political agenda. Abu shares their view, and the chilling logic that ongoing death and destruction is a good thing, even if it is Muslims dying, because a glorious Muslim victory and the destruction of Israel is inevitable.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21842
A cat with a view
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #17 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 11:26am
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Jul 27th, 2014 at 10:55am:

Palestinians elected Hamas because they implemented programs for healthcare, education and other basic essentials, even with their limited resources.

The overwhelming majority of their budget was used for these. That's why Palestinians supported Hamas.




Yeah, because of the unjust Zionist blockade of Gaza, and because of the limited resources available to Hamas they have only launched 1,000's of rockets against Israel,         instead of 10,000's of rockets.     Tongue

Poor Hamas!!!

They just can't get their hands on enough 'resources' - to help the impoverished Gazan people - because of the Zionist blockade of Gaza.         Tongue


Poor Hamas!!!

It only has 10,000's of rockets in its arsenal, instead of the 100,000's of rockets, that it wants.         Sad            Cheesy








IMAGE....
...


SOURCE....
http://www.idfblog.com/facts-figures/rocket-attacks-toward-israel/


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49224
At my desk.
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #18 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 11:52am
 
Annie do you share Gandalf's delusion that Hamas militants do not hide behind civilians and use them as cover to attack Israel?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96194
Gender: male
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #19 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 12:00pm
 
Sometimes a question is just a question, Annie.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #20 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 12:01pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2014 at 11:17am:
Quote:
You've got to be joking.

There is no moral high ground in this conflict. None.


They are relying on Israel not stooping as low. They are relying on Israel not deliberately firing on civilians, as Hamas does. They are relying on the human shields working, otherwise they would not rely on human shields. If Israel applied the same policy as Hamas with it's far greater firepower, all the palestinians would be dead. Every single one. Hamas relies on their unwillingness to do so. .


The human shields argument is bullshit. There is nowhere in Gaza that isn't densely populated, which is why there are such high civilian casualties. I get that it works both ways - if Hamas can't avoid drawing power to densely populated areas, Israel can't avoid hitting densely populated areas. There is no alternative for either of them while this stupid, stupid war continues.

But Israel has a record of punitive, disproportionate punishment. Flechette shells, white phosphorus...all completely unecessary for anything but to inflict as much suffering as possible on the civilian population. That is unforgivable.

Quote:
You are making the logical fallacy of assuming because the Palestinians are losing, they must somehow have a moral claim.


How do you get that I think Palestinians have a moral claim from me saying that there is no moral highground? I see nothing moral about any part of this.

We have Israeli leaders calling for the murder of Palestinian mothers. Other leaders suggesting that only through the rape of Palestinian woman can terrorists be beaten. Not weird one off psychopaths - members of parliament and scholars.

Your moral highground is a joke.
Back to top
 

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.
 
IP Logged
 
mantra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #21 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 12:19pm
 
A well written article by Mike Carlton puts into words the agony of Palestine. The world makes noises of disapproval and then they turn away and forget.

An extract only..

Quote:
In an open letter to US President Barack Obama, Dr Mads Gilbert, a Norwegian surgeon working at Gaza's al-Shifa hospital, writes of "the incomprehensible chaos of bodies, sizes, limbs, walking, not walking, breathing, not breathing, bleeding, not bleeding humans. Humans!

"Ashy grey faces – Oh no! Not one more load of tens of maimed and bleeding. We still have lakes of blood on the floor in the emergency room, piles of dripping, blood-soaked bandages to clear out ... the cleaners, everywhere, swiftly shovelling the blood and discarded tissues, hair, clothes, cannulas – the leftovers from death – all taken away... to be prepared again, to be repeated all over."

The onslaught is indiscriminate and unrelenting, with but one possible conclusion: Israel is not fighting the terrorists of Hamas. In defiance of the laws of war and the norms of civilised behaviour, it is waging its own war of terror on the entire Gaza population of about 1.7 million people. Call it genocide, call it ethnic cleansing: the aim is to kill Arabs.

As none other than Malcolm Fraser tweeted this week: "If any other country went to war killing as many civilians, women and children, it would be named a war crime." But it is not, although the UN is asking the question of both sides.

Yes, Hamas is also trying to kill Israeli civilians, with a barrage of rockets and guerilla border attacks. It, too, is guilty of terror and grave war crimes. But Israeli citizens and their homes and towns have been effectively shielded by the nation's Iron Dome defence system, and so far only three of its civilians have died in this latest conflict.

The Israeli response has been out of all proportion, a monstrous distortion of the much-vaunted right of self defence.

It is a breathtaking irony that these atrocities can be committed by a people with a proud liberal tradition of scholarship and culture, who hold the Warsaw Ghetto and the six million dead of the Holocaust at the centre of their race memory. But this is a new and brutal Israel dominated by the hardline, right-wing Likud Party of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his coalition. As one observer puts it: "All the seeds of the incitement of the past few years, all the nationalistic, racist legislation and the incendiary propaganda, the scare campaigns and the subversion of democracy by the right-wing camp – all these have borne fruit, and that fruit is rank and rotten. The nationalist right has now sunk to a new level, with almost the whole country following in its wake. The word 'fascism', which I try to use as little as possible, finally has its deserved place in the Israeli political discourse."

Fascism in Israel? At this point the Australian Likudniks, as Bob Carr calls them, will be lunging for their keyboards. There will be the customary torrent of abusive emails calling me a Nazi, an anti-Semite, a Holocaust denier, an ignoramus. As usual they will demand my resignation, my sacking. As it's been before, some of this will be pornographic or threatening violence.


http://www.smh.com.au/comment/israels-rank-and-rotten-fruit-is-being-called-fasc...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #22 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 12:32pm
 
mantra wrote on Jul 27th, 2014 at 12:19pm:
A well written article by Mike Carlton puts into words the agony of Palestine. The world makes noises of disapproval and then they turn away and forget.

An extract only..

Quote:
In an open letter to US President Barack Obama, Dr Mads Gilbert, a Norwegian surgeon working at Gaza's al-Shifa hospital, writes of "the incomprehensible chaos of bodies, sizes, limbs, walking, not walking, breathing, not breathing, bleeding, not bleeding humans. Humans!

"Ashy grey faces – Oh no! Not one more load of tens of maimed and bleeding. We still have lakes of blood on the floor in the emergency room, piles of dripping, blood-soaked bandages to clear out ... the cleaners, everywhere, swiftly shovelling the blood and discarded tissues, hair, clothes, cannulas – the leftovers from death – all taken away... to be prepared again, to be repeated all over."

The onslaught is indiscriminate and unrelenting, with but one possible conclusion: Israel is not fighting the terrorists of Hamas. In defiance of the laws of war and the norms of civilised behaviour, it is waging its own war of terror on the entire Gaza population of about 1.7 million people. Call it genocide, call it ethnic cleansing: the aim is to kill Arabs.

As none other than Malcolm Fraser tweeted this week: "If any other country went to war killing as many civilians, women and children, it would be named a war crime." But it is not, although the UN is asking the question of both sides.

Yes, Hamas is also trying to kill Israeli civilians, with a barrage of rockets and guerilla border attacks. It, too, is guilty of terror and grave war crimes. But Israeli citizens and their homes and towns have been effectively shielded by the nation's Iron Dome defence system, and so far only three of its civilians have died in this latest conflict.

The Israeli response has been out of all proportion, a monstrous distortion of the much-vaunted right of self defence.

It is a breathtaking irony that these atrocities can be committed by a people with a proud liberal tradition of scholarship and culture, who hold the Warsaw Ghetto and the six million dead of the Holocaust at the centre of their race memory. But this is a new and brutal Israel dominated by the hardline, right-wing Likud Party of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his coalition. As one observer puts it: "All the seeds of the incitement of the past few years, all the nationalistic, racist legislation and the incendiary propaganda, the scare campaigns and the subversion of democracy by the right-wing camp – all these have borne fruit, and that fruit is rank and rotten. The nationalist right has now sunk to a new level, with almost the whole country following in its wake. The word 'fascism', which I try to use as little as possible, finally has its deserved place in the Israeli political discourse."

Fascism in Israel? At this point the Australian Likudniks, as Bob Carr calls them, will be lunging for their keyboards. There will be the customary torrent of abusive emails calling me a Nazi, an anti-Semite, a Holocaust denier, an ignoramus. As usual they will demand my resignation, my sacking. As it's been before, some of this will be pornographic or threatening violence.


http://www.smh.com.au/comment/israels-rank-and-rotten-fruit-is-being-called-fasc...



Thank you for posting that. It's an excellent article - I hadn't seen it.
Back to top
 

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49224
At my desk.
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #23 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 12:40pm
 
Quote:
But Israel has a record of punitive, disproportionate punishment.


Hamas has a history of steady unprovoked attacks and a policy of wiping Israel of the map. What is "disproportionate punishment" when "proportionate punishment" merely results in a steady stream of ongoing rocket fire?

Quote:
We have Israeli leaders calling for the murder of Palestinian mothers.


It is not Israeli policy. This is idiots saying stupid things. When it comes to destroying Israel on the other hand, it is official policy, and that is exactly what they would do, if they could.

Quote:
Other leaders suggesting that only through the rape of Palestinian woman can terrorists be beaten. Not weird one off psychopaths - members of parliament and scholars.


Israeli politicians say what Hamas is prepared to do. If your "no moral high ground" argument rests on Israeli's saying mean thing, then you are already coming up short.

Quote:
The onslaught is indiscriminate and unrelenting, with but one possible conclusion: Israel is not fighting the terrorists of Hamas. In defiance of the laws of war and the norms of civilised behaviour, it is waging its own war of terror on the entire Gaza population of about 1.7 million people. Call it genocide, call it ethnic cleansing: the aim is to kill Arabs


Crap. They could do this in about three seconds if they wanted to. They could kill all of the Palestinians, then move on to further fields of Arabs. The outcome has actually been an increase in the palestinian population. Unless of course he is suggesting that they want them to breed so that they can continue killing them for sport, rather than to get rid of them.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34905
Gender: male
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #24 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 12:40pm
 
if i was a parent in israel and my government refused to unleash every bit of armaments at their disposal i would be asking why if my conscripted son or daughter was killed.
the israeli government have a duty to their people .
end of story.
my criticism is that israel is losing fine young men and women (conscripts) by trying to pussy foot around.
Who telephones an address 10 minutes before it is hit?
Even the police executing a warrant wouldnt extend this courtesy.
they need to go in hard and finish this and stop this death by a 1000 cuts.(which seems to have been going on for 60 years.

The USA is nearly energy independant now, so they will rapidly lose interest in the middle east. Israel should act decisively now. They dont have much time.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49224
At my desk.
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #25 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 1:39pm
 
Quote:
The human shields argument is bullshit. There is nowhere in Gaza that isn't densely populated, which is why there are such high civilian casualties.


Crap. Google maps satellite view and map view both indicate enourmous variation in population density, as you would expect, as do other maps that attempt to capture population density in the area. Furthermore, Hamas is the effective government. It is within their rights to set aside one of the less populated areas for military use. They would never do this of course, because that would present Israel with a military target every time Hamas fires rockets from there, and they would not be able to whine about Israel targetting civilians.

The fact is, Hamas deliberately fires from populated areas in order to inflict as much suffering on their own people as possible, because that suffering furthers the political agenda of Hamas. It is a cold, calculated strategy to maintain a state of war because they are convinced of their ability to one day defeat Israel.

Do you still share Gandalf's delusion that Hamas militants do not hide behind civilians and use them as cover to attack Israel?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 106006
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #26 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 1:52pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2014 at 1:39pm:
Quote:
The human shields argument is bullshit. There is nowhere in Gaza that isn't densely populated, which is why there are such high civilian casualties.


Crap. Google maps satellite view and map view both indicate enourmous variation in population density, as you would expect, as do other maps that attempt to capture population density in the area. Furthermore, Hamas is the effective government. It is within their rights to set aside one of the less populated areas for military use. They would never do this of course, because that would present Israel with a military target every time Hamas fires rockets from there, and they would not be able to whine about Israel targetting civilians.

The fact is, Hamas deliberately fires from populated areas in order to inflict as much suffering on their own people as possible, because that suffering furthers the political agenda of Hamas. It is a cold, calculated strategy to maintain a state of war because they are convinced of their ability to one day defeat Israel.

Do you still share Gandalf's delusion that Hamas militants do not hide behind civilians and use them as cover to attack Israel?


Dear Freediver,
have you ever thought that Hamas has gone crazy after all the
oppression the Palestinians have suffered & so rational thinking has been lost?


forgiven

namaste
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #27 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 1:54pm
 
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2014 at 8:57am:
And this proves Hamas is not using densely populated areas?


No, I am not proving anything. The point is about what Israel is claiming ad-nauseum (that hamas uses human shields) - which they have no evidence for.

Quote:
Gandalf, you yourself recently claimed that a 2 year old casualty of Israel was in fact killed by a Palestinian rocket fired from within a densely populated urban area that misfired and went into the house in front. The child topped the list of civilian casualties being blamed on Israel at the time and being posted widely on this forum.


The incident reveals nothing whatsoever regarding whether or not the rocket was fired from a densely populated area.

Quote:
The fact is Hamas is outgunned. They are militarily inferior by orders of magnitude. The only way they can keep it up is by hiding behind their mother's skirts and relying on Israel keeping the moral high ground. They actually want the Palestinian casualties, because that is what keeps the Muslims angry and supporting Hamas


Pure conjecture.

An honest appraisal of this would acknowledge that armed resistance is a natural and inevitable consequence of walling people in and enforcing an economically crippling blockade.

An honest appraisal would also acknowledge that in the past the only thing that has reduced the rocket attacks has been negotiations under a ceasefire - as happened in 2008.

Your talk about who is taking the moral high ground regarding this practice is a joke - given the fact that the only known use of human shields was done - systematically - by the IDF for the best part of a decade.

Quote:
It takes an elaborate exercise in ignoring reality to analyse it any other way.


Actually, it just takes an honest appraisal of the actual evidence. Not hard really.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #28 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 2:22pm
 
Hamas clearly firing rockets behind children's skirts in the middle of densely populated neighbourhoods:

...

...

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 27th, 2014 at 2:34pm by polite_gandalf »  

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Datalife
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2405
Gender: male
Re: About those alleged "human shields" in gaza
Reply #29 - Jul 27th, 2014 at 2:50pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 27th, 2014 at 1:54pm:
freediver wrote on Jul 27th, 2014 at 8:57am:
And this proves Hamas is not using densely populated areas?


No, I am not proving anything. The point is about what Israel is claiming ad-nauseum (that hamas uses human shields) - which they have no evidence for.



I am intrigued by this gandalf, are you sincere in your belief that Hamas does not use monuments, churches, schools and hospitals for protection, knowing that the result will mean non combatant fatalities, ( which incidentally for Hamas  is an entirely rational act) that achieves multiple aims or are you acting as a propagandist?


Back to top
 

"If they’re out there in the high seas, what you would do is seek to turn them back through the agency of the Australian Navy".

Kevin Rudd on 2GB, July 12, 2007
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 13
Send Topic Print