OK - first video Bill Clinton parroting the usual Israel propaganda line with no evidence - fail
Second video is some Hamas guy
responding to an actual event that happened, when a resident received a "knock on the roof" strike by Israel, and to which a group nearby resident responded by placing themselves on the roof to try and prevent the bombing. They failed, and 7 people died. The guy in the video is simply applauding this action (for obvious propaganda purposes) and saying there should be more of it. Note: *NOT* ordering people to stay. Fail
Third video is a statement of the Palestinian National and Islamic Forces - a group formed by and led by fatah - Hamas's traditional rival - ie *NOT* Hamas. Fail.
On planet earth, mainstream media is saying things like this:
Quote:Israel also claimed that Hamas had forced civilians to remain in the Gaza City neighbourhood of Shujai'iya after the IDF warned them to evacuate ahead of its assault on Sunday. Civilians were being "held as hostages", said Peter Lerner, an IDF military spokesman.
These claims have not been backed up by independent reporting from international journalists covering the war from Gaza. Instead, dispatches from the ground have presented complex reasons why some residents did not evacuate from Shujai'iya and other areas targeted by the IDF. Many said nowhere in Gaza was safe, so they saw little point in abandoning their homes.
Others cited worries about not knowing the identities of people who would be their new neighbours; they could be evacuating a familiar neighbourhood for one that was a militant stronghold and others were simply too terrified to go out on the streets. Many media reports said there was no evidence of coercion by Hamas.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/24/gaza-hamas-fighters-military-bases-...FD tried to dismiss this article by claiming it resorts to (in his words) "vague arm waving" and "absurd leaps of logic", though he spent about 10 pages trying to avoid what he actually means by this. Personally, "vague" and "illogical" would be about the last terms I would use to describe this particular article.