cods wrote on Aug 10
th, 2014 at 10:24am:
well I do have to admit mantra I have yet to see any thing like carlton wrote about Israel..likewise written about muslims....sorry mate can you provide something.. just so I can compare...I do not take into account forum like this one...I mean media thats out there in full view... do you also agree that News Ltd was under pressure from gillard to sack smith and milne.???.....I honestly believe the SMH was more afraid of losing readers.. people who buy their twisted view of politics.. I would definitely love to see a column by carlton telling us how bad Hamas are???? if you have one.just to be balanced of course.
Carlton doesn't usually get too involved in international issues, unless there's a war. He was at his best during the Howard and Bush era.
Cods - you need to head over to the Islam or Extremism forums and find out where the anti-Islamist members get their material.
Where do you get your information from about Hamas and Palestine? You have to read it somewhere. Why are your sources supposedly factual and mine not when really it's just a matter of opinion.
There is nothing wrong with the SMH. I could say the same about the Australian. It has been extremely one eyed in the past.
Soren wrote on Aug 10
th, 2014 at 10:09am:
Memo:
He resigned because of his abuse of reader and commenters, NOT because of his published article and its accompanying cartoon.
You and the imams should come up for air and think a little, rather than go off in your cutomary 'yeah, but the Jews… .' way. The article is still on the smh site and will stay. Because it is not the reason for his resignation.
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/israels-rank-and-rotten-fruit-is-being-called-fascism-20140724-zwd2t.html
We were told that, but how many journalists are suspended for being rude to their readers? I'm sure all media outlets would get complaints about rude responses from journalists they were hassling.
Look what Bolt gets away with - not to mention Piggy Akerman and Alan Jones.