Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print
Number 1 wally (Read 12011 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #60 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 12:54pm
 
Karnal wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 12:37pm:
Soren wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 10:42am:
Brian Ross wrote on Aug 14th, 2014 at 7:28pm:
No immigrant group is "ideologically opposed to freedom and democracy".  Individuals may be but the entire Muslim community?  What planet do you live on, FD, really?  'cause it sure isn't the Earth.  I've never met a Muslim opposed to "freedom and democracy" and I've met a fairly wide cross section.  You speak as if this is what the majority of Muslims believe.  Roll Eyes




Islam is ideologically opposed to freedom, democracy, equality, self-correction and all the rest of that makes the West.

Individuals who are born into Islam but who do not embrace it fully or at all (apostates) may not be against these things. But Islam is and its adhrents, by definition, are. Whether they are 'peaceful or not is a different issue. Most Germans in the Nazi era, Russians under Stalin, Chinese under Mao etc were not vicious murderers themselves even as millions were killed in these regimes. The West didn't say, "lets allow non-dicriminatory migration from these places because it is only the 'tiny minority' of Germans, Russian and Chinese are bad, those who distort the essentially peaceful ideas of National Socialism, Communism or Mao thought".

Only those who were demonstrably AGAINST these ideologies were given refuge. Not the ones who were too cowardly and opportunistic, despite their 'vast majority"  to confront the evils of the  "distorting tiny minority". The same should apply to Islam.



Sorry, old chap, I don’t quite follow. Are you saying Muslims are terrible, but Nazis and Communists are, on the whole, really nice people once you get to know them?

Please explain.




Islam, Nazism, Communism are terrible ideologies that have been inflicted upon the world with the assistance of some very polite people. People who walk their dog, say hello to their neighbour, eat corn flakes for breakfast, and, if given the chance, like to hack the head of anyone who says the wrong thing. Brian's best friends, in other words.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 95939
Gender: male
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #61 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 1:23pm
 
freediver wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 12:54pm:
Karnal wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 12:37pm:
Soren wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 10:42am:
Brian Ross wrote on Aug 14th, 2014 at 7:28pm:
No immigrant group is "ideologically opposed to freedom and democracy".  Individuals may be but the entire Muslim community?  What planet do you live on, FD, really?  'cause it sure isn't the Earth.  I've never met a Muslim opposed to "freedom and democracy" and I've met a fairly wide cross section.  You speak as if this is what the majority of Muslims believe.  Roll Eyes




Islam is ideologically opposed to freedom, democracy, equality, self-correction and all the rest of that makes the West.

Individuals who are born into Islam but who do not embrace it fully or at all (apostates) may not be against these things. But Islam is and its adhrents, by definition, are. Whether they are 'peaceful or not is a different issue. Most Germans in the Nazi era, Russians under Stalin, Chinese under Mao etc were not vicious murderers themselves even as millions were killed in these regimes. The West didn't say, "lets allow non-dicriminatory migration from these places because it is only the 'tiny minority' of Germans, Russian and Chinese are bad, those who distort the essentially peaceful ideas of National Socialism, Communism or Mao thought".

Only those who were demonstrably AGAINST these ideologies were given refuge. Not the ones who were too cowardly and opportunistic, despite their 'vast majority"  to confront the evils of the  "distorting tiny minority". The same should apply to Islam.



Sorry, old chap, I don’t quite follow. Are you saying Muslims are terrible, but Nazis and Communists are, on the whole, really nice people once you get to know them?

Please explain.




Islam, Nazism, Communism are terrible ideologies that have been inflicted upon the world with the assistance of some very polite people. People who walk their dog, say hello to their neighbour, eat corn flakes for breakfast, and, if given the chance, like to hack the head of anyone who says the wrong thing. Brian's best friends, in other words.


That’s quite a few ideologies, FD. Quite a few on this board are heavily influenced by at least one of them.

Do you think, perhaps, that you or I could be one of these head-hacking types? You know, one day we’re happily eating our corn flakes, and the next - we’re Brian’s best friend.

People like Y and the old boy, of course, would be excluded. We know theyve got the axe ready and waiting.They consider it a sin to have a clean axe - the more bone splinters, dried blood and hair, the better.

But ordinary people like myself and the 2007 FD - could we go from breakfast-eating dog-walkers to head-hacking mass murderers without any warning or sign?

What do you think it would take, FD?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #62 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 1:51pm
 
It would take a threat to our freedom and democracy.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41968
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #63 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 2:57pm
 
Adamant wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 1:52am:
"Yet, when I ask individuals and groups of Muslims I get very different results, FD.   I've served with, worked with, studied with and taught Muslims for over 30 years, and none have expressed the opinions you claim are commonplace amongst Muslims".

In previous posts Brian you have stated that you are using your own name and proud of it.

Why is it that I can find NO link to your claim I have quoted?


Perhaps you aren't looking hard enough or in the right places, Adamant?   Roll Eyes

Not everything is on the Internet or the web and I've never published anything about my personal experiences or interactions with Muslims., therefore there is nothing in the public domain.  When I publish my autobiography, you'll be able to read about it then.  Obviously, I hope you'll purchase a copy and not just welch off the public purse?   Grin
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41968
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #64 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 3:02pm
 
freediver wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 8:33am:
Brian Ross wrote on Aug 15th, 2014 at 11:33pm:
freediver wrote on Aug 15th, 2014 at 11:02pm:
So if I discover tomorrow morning that my front lawn is chewed down to grass level and declare "rabbits did this", I must necessarily mean every single rabbit in the world took a bite from my lawn overnight?


No but when you make a claim about "Muslims" you are implying that all Muslims are what you claim.


Why is it different Brian? If I found black flags on my lawn instead and proclaimed "Muslims did this", would I be mistakenly insisting that every Muslim in the world turned up my lawn overnight and left their jihad flag behind?


When you state, "Muslims believe this," or "Muslims do that," you are speaking of the collective, plural, implying all Muslims believe or do something, FD.    When you state "Muslims have done this," you are describing the action of a group, not that all Muslims have done the thing you're claiming.  English appears to be a second language to you, FD or are you merely being deliberately obtuse and attempting to wriggle out (again)?   Roll Eyes

Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41968
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #65 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 3:11pm
 
Soren wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 10:42am:
Brian Ross wrote on Aug 14th, 2014 at 7:28pm:
No immigrant group is "ideologically opposed to freedom and democracy".  Individuals may be but the entire Muslim community?  What planet do you live on, FD, really?  'cause it sure isn't the Earth.  I've never met a Muslim opposed to "freedom and democracy" and I've met a fairly wide cross section.  You speak as if this is what the majority of Muslims believe.  Roll Eyes




Islam is ideologically opposed to freedom, democracy, equality, self-correction and all the rest of that makes the West.


According to whom, Soren?  What authority do you reference when making such a sweeping statement?   Roll Eyes

Why is the most populous Muslim nation a democracy?  Why are most Muslim nations democracies?
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 95939
Gender: male
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #66 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 3:49pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 3:11pm:
Soren wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 10:42am:
Brian Ross wrote on Aug 14th, 2014 at 7:28pm:
No immigrant group is "ideologically opposed to freedom and democracy".  Individuals may be but the entire Muslim community?  What planet do you live on, FD, really?  'cause it sure isn't the Earth.  I've never met a Muslim opposed to "freedom and democracy" and I've met a fairly wide cross section.  You speak as if this is what the majority of Muslims believe.  Roll Eyes




Islam is ideologically opposed to freedom, democracy, equality, self-correction and all the rest of that makes the West.


According to whom, Soren?  What authority do you reference when making such a sweeping statement?   Roll Eyes 


Yadda. The old boy must have read one of his posts.

Keep it up, old chap. Y’s been waiting for someone to read his posts here for years.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 95939
Gender: male
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #67 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 3:56pm
 
freediver wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 1:51pm:
It would take a threat to our freedom and democracy.


Sounds like we’re safe then. There hasn’t been one of them since those Afghan camel drivers in WWI or WWII.

Unless you suspect one of us wanting to blow up a bus?

It’s not me, FD. I catch public transport all the time.

And I haven’t been on a camel since WWI.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #68 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 4:37pm
 
Every Islamic doctrine and utterance is against freedom. The very word means submission.

And elections do not make a democracy. You need a degree if social solidarity and the rule of law - but these are missing from tribal, corrupt societies, which is what all Muslim countries are.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41968
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #69 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 4:48pm
 
freediver wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 12:54pm:
Islam, Nazism, Communism are terrible ideologies that have been inflicted upon the world with the assistance of some very polite people. People who walk their dog, say hello to their neighbour, eat corn flakes for breakfast, and, if given the chance, like to hack the head of anyone who says the wrong thing. Brian's best friends, in other words.


Please provide evidence that my "best friends," like to, "hack the head of anyone who says the wrong thing," FD.   Roll Eyes

Oh, BTW, how are your mates in the EDL?

https://www.facebook.com/CW.Muslim.Defence.League/posts/513995098694155

http://www.halesowennews.co.uk/news/9309878.Mindless_EDL_thugs_storm_Muslim_exhibition_in_Cradley_Heath_market/?ref=twtrec
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41968
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #70 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 4:50pm
 
Soren wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 4:37pm:
Every Islamic doctrine and utterance is against freedom. The very word means submission.


So, you should have no problem then quoting this doctrine to us, chapter and verse, Soren?   Roll Eyes

Quote:
And elections do not make a democracy. You need a degree if social solidarity and the rule of law - but these are missing from tribal, corrupt societies, which is what all Muslim countries are.


So, Indonesia is a "tribal, corrupt society"?  Really?   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 95939
Gender: male
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #71 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 5:00pm
 
Soren wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 4:37pm:
Every Islamic doctrine and utterance is against freedom. The very word means submission.

And elections do not make a democracy. You need a degree if social solidarity and the rule of law - but these are missing from tribal, corrupt societies, which is what all Muslim countries are.



You’d better tell that to FD, old boy. He thinks Iraq and Afghanistan are the next South Korea.

Always absolutely never ever, eh?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 95939
Gender: male
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #72 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 5:16pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 4:50pm:
Soren wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 4:37pm:
Every Islamic doctrine and utterance is against freedom. The very word means submission.


So, you should have no problem then quoting this doctrine to us, chapter and verse, Soren?   Roll Eyes

Quote:
And elections do not make a democracy. You need a degree if social solidarity and the rule of law - but these are missing from tribal, corrupt societies, which is what all Muslim countries are.


So, Indonesia is a "tribal, corrupt society"?  Really?   Roll Eyes


They’re hardly the pinnacle of Freeedom. The current president-elect was voted in on a platform to fight corruption.

More’s the pity, eh? The Australian government preferred to work with Suharto. Demokracy in South East Asia has never worked in our interests.

Alas, Australian history is illusive to the old boy. He prefers Medieval Studies.

Always, absolutely, never ever. Stilts.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49096
At my desk.
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #73 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 6:03pm
 
Quote:
When you state, "Muslims believe this," or "Muslims do that," you are speaking of the collective, plural, implying all Muslims believe or do something, FD.


How do you know exactly what I mean Brian? Is this another demonstration of your amazing ability to know what people think without asking them?

Quote:
English appears to be a second language to you, FD or are you merely being deliberately obtuse and attempting to wriggle out (again)?


This is nothing to do with the meaning of English and everything to do with you imagining things I don't actually say. You even admitted you were "forced to fill in the gaps".

Quote:
Why is the most populous Muslim nation a democracy?


Gandalf was recently complaining about the 'evil west' interfering to make it that way. When the most populous Muslim nation is a democracy, that is Islam, but when they slaughter communists to get there, that is all our fault.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Number 1 wally
Reply #74 - Aug 16th, 2014 at 6:43pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 4:50pm:
Soren wrote on Aug 16th, 2014 at 4:37pm:
Every Islamic doctrine and utterance is against freedom. The very word means submission.


So, you should have no problem then quoting this doctrine to us, chapter and verse, Soren?   Roll Eyes




All of the Koran, all of the hadiths.

It is conceived entirely on  unfree premises - that is why it is called Submission. Islam is entirely premised on sumbmission to an absolutely unfathomable, unknowable God. All its texts and teachings follow from that.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print