Soren wrote on Sep 1
st, 2014 at 9:56am:
That's right, PB, and we no longer have interests, let alone enemies, only friends whose grievances we haven't yet accommodated.
That's just it, old dear, we can only really have mutual interests with any state. In a post-Cold War world, the trick is to discover and recallibrate the balance of those interests.
Painting ISIS as just a crowd of Allah Uakbarring automatons fighting to the death is just silly. It's James Bond villain material. Utterly mediocre, even for you.
But having said that, the very point of this discussion is how to wipe ISIS off the face of the earth, not how to live in harmony with them. And herein lies the problem.
Uncle (and the "Coalition") can't do it. It would start the Iraqi occupation all over again.
The Iraqi government can't do it. Their Sunni solidiers put down their weapons. An army of Shi'a soldiers would just create a new regional conflict. The winner? Iran.
The Kurds can't do it - with who's army? Who's weapons?
Surely a discussion about a problem should be about finding a solution. But, for yourself, it's just a way to vent your spleen in the usual futile, self-indulgent display of bile. Always, absolutely, never ever.
It is a jolly world, no?