TWO YOUTUBE VIDEOS...


     a number of Egyptian TV commentators have been exposing the hypocrisy of the Hamas leadership...

[9-12-July-2014]

"You can see how Khaled Mashal [Hamas supremo] is waging Jihad in Qatar." [Khaled Mashal is seen in the video, seated in a plush Qatar hotel eating a sumptuous meal. And we see other scenes of Khaled Mashal 'waging Jihad in Qatar', in the comfort of a plush Qatar hotel.]

#1,
Egyptian TV Hosts Slam Hamas Leaders: We Are Sick and Tired of You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VtENBF_yjo



[16-July-2014]
An Egyptian TV commentator explains;
So as to prevent continuing civilian casualties in Gaza....everybody supported the [early] Gaza ceasefire proposals - everyone except Hamas.
An Egyptian TV commentator poses this question to the world;
Why was that ?

During all of its early ceasefire 'negotiations' Hamas presented 10 non-negotiable demands, which would have to be met, before Hamas would accede to the proposed Gaza ceasefire.
The Egyptian TV commentator posits, that essentially, the Hamas 'negotiating' position was always... 

"If you don't give us what we want......We don't care how many Palestinians die."

The Egyptian TV commentator goes on to lampoon Hamas, as fantasists,     ....over one particular Hamas demand.
In that Hamas, in their demands before agreeing to a Gaza ceasefire, included a demand that Egypt, VOID EGYPTIAN SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE RAFAH BORDER CROSSING, ...INTO EGYPT.
Hamas demanded [that before agreeing to a Gaza ceasefire], that Hamas along with "a friendly country" [i.e. a country that would be nominated by Hamas], together, supervise the Rafah border crossing, INTO EGYPT.

On that demand, the Egyptian TV commentator posited;

"....Someone who suggests such things belongs in an asylum. This is deranged."

#2,
Egyptian TV Host Osama Mounir to Hamas Leaders: Dream on! You Belong in a Mental Asylum

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xuYcjubV7I




I hope that many of the people of Gaza have access to these YOUTUBE videos, and that they will eventually find and view them.

Soren wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2014 at 1:45am:


This is what you get when dumb foreigners who have no knowledge at all of local political issues open their mouths. The old boy has all the self-awareness of a fat Amerikan tourist on package tour.

Yes, old chap, there are french fries with the kebabs. Would you care for an invasion?

Soren wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2014 at 10:40am:


Good point S. In fact I think I'll create a new group of rapists and head hackers and call it "Danish Trollers" - and thereby automatically making you responsible for them.

The only difference in this case is that both words are related, not just one. 

Didn't Denmark commit atrocities in Greenland?

Soren wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2014 at 11:23am:


Looks like the old boy's been reading Althusser on ideology. Repressive State Aparatuses, Ideological State Aparatuses, all that. Ideologies underpin belief systems - they are not systems of belief in themselves. Ideologies are largely unconscious. Ideological forces such as race, class and gender disguise themselves. Being revealed threatens ideologies.

Shouting Allah Uakbar while you blow something up is definitely an ideological action, but your stated reason for doing so is a conscious rationale, not an ideology. That’s the BIG diff that the old boy doesn’t want you to see.

Calling for the carpet-bombing of entire populations based on their cultural/religious beliefs is also ideological. It's done for the sole purpose of providing pleasure or relieving anxiety - a form of shadenfreud with no conscious purpose or plan.

Any proposed rationale is merely an afterthought. The point is to satisfy the urge - using any means necessary. Such reasons are full of ideology, but not ideologies in themselves. "Security" is not an ideology, but deeply laden with ideological forces.

Revealing the ideological foundations of such calls to violence provides much anxiety. The old boy is perpetually irritable. At times, like the Jihadist, he's just plain cranky. He's right - Denmark, like Australia, is not an ideology, but neither is Islam. "Islam", like "America" or "the West" is a collection of competing ideologies.

Ideologies are those unconscious forces that fill you full of bile, or tie you blindly to some abstract tribal allegiance. Blaming the "West" is ideological. Blaming "Islam" is ideological. Being driven to extreme and pointless calls to non-defensive acts of violence is most ideological.

The old boy will, no doubt, disagree. He's a Freudian.

Where there was ego, there shall id be.

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2014 at 4:31pm:


Should we ask the old boy?

Yadda wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2014 at 11:57pm:


Spoken like a true Marxist, Y.

Yadda wrote on Sep 4^th, 2014 at 12:32am:


“A dog is not considered a good dog because he is a good barker. A man is not considered a good man because he is a good talker.” - Buddha.