UnSubRocky wrote on Aug 24
th, 2014 at 1:30am:
When was the last time there was a beheading in Australia? I know of two that happened in my town. One was 9 years ago, by a group of Jihadists who didn't like one of their own befriending an infidel. The other was practically a beheading, because the assailants (who, incidentally, converted to Islam in gaol) killed the guy by digging in to his neck with a bowie and leaving his head near severed. Posting up a cartoon about the slaying of aborigines is not going to change my mind about beheadings of people in the Middle East as being a cultural modus operandi.
It wasn't intended to. It was intended to point out the contradictions between what The Dear Leader was claiming and what actually happened.
Quote:I'm talking about with the intentional removal of people's heads in the 21st century Australia. Include the 20th century, if you want. I don't believe you about the 19th and 18th century. Do you have an example within the last 3 centuries of an actual person (named) who has committed a beheading on anyone. Bonus points if the person you are talking about is caucasian. I can only name one, and he got off lightly on a mental incapacitation plea.
John Fleming
John Russell
James Lamb
John Blake
William Hawkins
Edward Foley
John (Black) Johnstone
George Palliser
James Oates (Hall’s Jemmy)
Charles Telluse
James Parry.
Were all placed on trial for the Myall Creek Massacre where Aborigines (primarily children) were beheaded. All were Caucasian. This occurred in the last 300 years, in Australia. Did I get all my points?
Quote:And whilst you are right to say that because some Middle Easterners do behead people with no apparent remorse, that it doesn't make them all a bunch of crazed psychopaths... that completely misses the point. You might not be aware that those regions deem the infanticide of their children to not being barbaric. They will slit the throats of deformed or handicapped children. They would probably take the life of some black or white child simply on the basis that they aren't Middle Eastern. I wouldn't trust a non-secular region of the world simply starting with the basis that they have no problem prosecuting someone for having alcohol or prosecuting someone for reporting a rape against herself.
You are relying on stereotypes. The Middle East is a big place, with multiple cultures and societies in it, it stretches from North Africa to Turkey and Iraq and down to Oman.
Quote:As for Mr Munga, the situation is that he has kicked down the door and is ready to see what your insides look like. But as an alternative interpretation, let's say he has knocked politely on your door, with machete in hand, and wants to discuss Midnight Oil with you. Are you really going to have so little intuition that you wouldn't call the polisi?
Again, it depends on the circumstance. If Mr. Munga has just come from working in the Cane Fields, I wouldn't be surprised to see a machete in his hand. I would be at most cautious, as I would be with anyone who came to the door with a bloody big knife in his hand but I wouldn't necessarily automatically assume that beyond desiring a discussion over an issue which concerns him, that anything was overly amiss.
Quote:Btw, "Ackbar" is the stereotypical generalisation for a Middle Eastern male who tries to condemn "The West" and the United States for all his stupid self-inflicted problems.
It is? It's the first time I've heard the term. Perhaps we just move in different circles? Same as I've never heard the term, "Mr.Munga" before.