Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 48
Send Topic Print
More Islamophobic attacks? (Read 39121 times)
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96367
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #180 - Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:01am
 
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 12:58am:
I enjoy exploring your belief system, which of course you are solely responsible for, right?


Absolutely not. The only person responsible for the old boy's belief system is the Muselmen.

It's an existential question. Your Muslim is the enemy, you see. He has always been the enemy. His very purpose is to be the enemy. Always, absolutely, never ever.

How can the old boy be responsible for his belief system?

I blame Islam.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #181 - Nov 10th, 2014 at 12:35pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 12:58am:
I enjoy exploring your belief system, which of course you are solely responsible for, right?


You really are a masochist Brian.  How is the Psych degree going, by the way?   Grin Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #182 - Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:24pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 12:58am:
Soren wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:31pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:28pm:
Ah, so, you do believe in "guilt by association" then? 

No, dickhead, I believe in taking responsibility for what you believe in. After all, it is an entirely free choice. 

You believe in Islam? You are responsible for that belief.

Got it?

Probably not.


So, they are not responsible for the actions of what their fellow co-religionists have done?  I just want to be clear.




If their co-religions expressly acted in the name of their shared religion, then they are responsible. They have shaped their shared religion as much as all their co-religionists. If they haven't and it has gone to the dogs, they should step up and shape it into something they can be proud of.

Belief is a personal choice of conscience, not a fate.  You are responsible.

Communists resigned from the party when membership was unconscionable.Catholics leave the Church, people leave belief systems. They are not immutable, even if they pretend to be Allah's final word.

There comes a point when you either do not want to associate with your co-religionists or you take upon yourself the correction of your religion.  If you area mere fellow-traveller all your life then you probably can't be bothered either way - in which case you are, well, a fellow traveller, rather than a committed believer -  and so you do not much care about the reputation.





Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #183 - Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:31pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 12:58am:
Now, why don't you answer the other points I've made, Soren?




I don't know what they were. Repost them.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42253
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #184 - Nov 16th, 2014 at 4:45pm
 
Soren wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:31pm:
I don't know what they were. Repost them.


For those whom appear to enjoy tap dancing...

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 12:58am:
Soren, if someone posts something that is obviously "racist" (and the issue of "race", not religion - just to stop your usual tap dancing), what do you refer to it as?  Say, if someone was to call Nelson Mandella an "n-i-g-g-e-r"?   

So, if someone posts something that is obviously "bigoted" (towards religion), what do you refer to it as?   Say, if someone was to suggested that, "All Catholics kiss the Pope's arse and worship Satan"?

So, if someone continually criticises one religion and it's adherents, without let up and in an often unwarranted way, despite being criticised themselves for doing it, what do you call it?

Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #185 - Nov 16th, 2014 at 5:27pm
 
If they are criticizing muslims / islam you call it warranted.

islam is a 7th century doctrine of hate speech, jihad, hijrah, taqiyya and kitman, terrorism, self alienation from normal society, etc.

muslims who accept the above religious philosophy (which causes muslims to be mass murderers etc. etc.) as being the final perfect word of their god allah, are just as guilty as any muslim who commits the atrocities. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #186 - Nov 16th, 2014 at 5:41pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 16th, 2014 at 4:45pm:
Soren wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:31pm:
I don't know what they were. Repost them.


For those whom appear to enjoy tap dancing...

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 12:58am:
Soren, if someone posts something that is obviously "racist" (and the issue of "race", not religion - just to stop your usual tap dancing), what do you refer to it as?  Say, if someone was to call Nelson Mandella an "n-i-g-g-e-r"?   

So, if someone posts something that is obviously "bigoted" (towards religion), what do you refer to it as?   Say, if someone was to suggested that, "All Catholics kiss the Pope's arse and worship Satan"?

So, if someone continually criticises one religion and it's adherents, without let up and in an often unwarranted way, despite being criticised themselves for doing it, what do you call it?




If someone jumps to the accusation of 'racists!!!!' I condemn that.  Nelson Mandela was a black man. Nige r is an unpleasant word for black people but it's a word, like f vck for making love. Whatchagonna do? Honkey is a white person. Pom is an Englishman. Chink is an east Asian. Using these words is impolite and in most settings unwelcome. But blacks call each other n iggers all the time, so they are switched onto the po-mo irony of language in a way you, po-faced little heresy sniffer, never will be.



Bigoted - well, kiss my Lutheran arse, you little anti-religious equal opportunity knocker of all religions (except Islam of course). Is that bigoted? Is any disagreement with Islam bigoted? You never worry about religion, numpty, you only ever worry about Islam. Can you please model for us the correct criticism of Islam? (we will be waiting foir a very, very long time).


Criticising religion - why the bloody hell can't anyone criticise any religion as long as they want? There are people where who criticise the Libs and Labor, left and right without letup. What the bloody hell is so special about Islam (other than the underlying, seething threat of violence) that it cannot be criticised without letup? I don't think it has any redeeming features. Are you going to censor what I think?  Why can't Islam be criticised without letup?
So I have to cuddle Nazism for 10 minutes in every hour of criticism? 20 minutes? Half and half?


What I like about this Forum is that I can come across people like you, who do not exist in the real world because they would not dare to be so amazingly stupid in front of people who know them. 


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42253
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #187 - Nov 16th, 2014 at 5:46pm
 
moses wrote on Nov 16th, 2014 at 5:27pm:
If they are criticizing muslims / islam you call it warranted.

islam is a 7th century doctrine of hate speech, jihad, hijrah, taqiyya and kitman, terrorism, self alienation from normal society, etc.

muslims who accept the above religious philosophy (which causes muslims to be mass murderers etc. etc.) as being the final perfect word of their god allah, are just as guilty as any muslim who commits the atrocities. 


You really are in denial about your own religion, Moses.  Makes your claim that you're not bigoted, a joke.   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42253
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #188 - Nov 16th, 2014 at 5:55pm
 
Soren wrote on Nov 16th, 2014 at 5:41pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 16th, 2014 at 4:45pm:
Soren wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:31pm:
I don't know what they were. Repost them.


For those whom appear to enjoy tap dancing...

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 12:58am:
Soren, if someone posts something that is obviously "racist" (and the issue of "race", not religion - just to stop your usual tap dancing), what do you refer to it as?  Say, if someone was to call Nelson Mandella an "n-i-g-g-e-r"?   

So, if someone posts something that is obviously "bigoted" (towards religion), what do you refer to it as?   Say, if someone was to suggested that, "All Catholics kiss the Pope's arse and worship Satan"?

So, if someone continually criticises one religion and it's adherents, without let up and in an often unwarranted way, despite being criticised themselves for doing it, what do you call it?




If someone jumps to the accusation of 'racists!!!!' I condemn that.  Nelson Mandela was a black man. Nige r is an unpleasant word for black people but it's a word, like f vck for making love. Whatchagonna do? Honkey is a white person. Pom is an Englishman. Chink is an east Asian. Using these words is impolite and in most settings unwelcome. But blacks call each other n iggers all the time, so they are switched onto the po-mo irony of language in a way you, po-faced little heresy sniffer, never will be.


So, then I take it you're perfectly OK with and accepting of the concepts of racism - that one race is superior to another on the basis of biological determinism - the colour of one's skin, the shape of one's eyes/nose/ears/etc, determines one's psychological and intelligence characteristics, Soren?  Afterall the use of racist language is merely the outward expression of such beliefs, right?

Quote:
Bigoted - well, kiss my Lutheran arse, you little anti-religious equal opportunity knocker of all religions (except Islam of course). Is that bigoted? Is any disagreement with Islam bigoted? You never worry about religion, numpty, you only ever worry about Islam. Can you please model for us the correct criticism of Islam? (we will be waiting foir a very, very long time).


You seem to miss the point - again - perhaps deliberately.  Bigotry is when an argument's rightness or wrongness is determined on the basis of the belief and prejudice of the person making it, not on the basis of its merits.  ie, "He is a Muslim, therefore he is wrong!"  or "Catholics are all Papists and their church is corrupt, therefore they wrong!"   Doesn't matter whether the argument is wrong or right, what is more important is the source, Soren.  So therefore, the point, "Islam has a big emphasis on charity and respect for the aged," is immaterial, it is damned in the eyes of the bigot because it is Islam, not whether or not it is correct or commendable.    According to you, it seems, this is perfectly OK.   Which suggests what about your viewpoint?

Quote:
Criticising religion - why the bloody hell can't anyone criticise any religion as long as they want? There are people where who criticise the Libs and Labor, left and right without letup. What the bloody hell is so special about Islam (other than the underlying, seething threat of violence) that it cannot be criticised without letup? I don't think it has any redeeming features. Are you going to censor what I think?  Why can't Islam be criticised without letup?
So I have to cuddle Nazism for 10 minutes in every hour of criticism? 20 minutes? Half and half?


Comparing apples and oranges again, Soren?

So, I take it you have no problems with anti-Semitism?   Roll Eyes

Quote:
What I like about this Forum is that I can come across people like you, who do not exist in the real world because they would not dare to be so amazingly stupid in front of people who know them. 


You call it "stupidity", I call it common decency.  How often do you rail about a person's religion in front of them the way you go on about Islam?  You must lead a very lonely existence if you have no consideration of the feelings and emotions of others...    Roll Eyes

Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Datalife
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2405
Gender: male
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #189 - Nov 16th, 2014 at 6:40pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 16th, 2014 at 5:55pm:
So, then I take it you're perfectly OK with and accepting of the concepts of racism - that one race is superior to another on the basis of biological determinism - the colour of one's skin, the shape of one's eyes/nose/ears/etc, determines one's psychological and intelligence characteristics, Soren?  Afterall the use of racist language is merely the outward expression of such beliefs, right?



Well done Brian, you do know what racism is, finally you have looked at a dictionary.  You have been using it incorrectly to label those who do not agree with your preffered border policies.  Cheesy
Back to top
 

"If they’re out there in the high seas, what you would do is seek to turn them back through the agency of the Australian Navy".

Kevin Rudd on 2GB, July 12, 2007
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #190 - Nov 16th, 2014 at 8:28pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 16th, 2014 at 5:55pm:
Soren wrote on Nov 16th, 2014 at 5:41pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Nov 16th, 2014 at 4:45pm:
Soren wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:31pm:
I don't know what they were. Repost them.


For those whom appear to enjoy tap dancing...

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 12:58am:
Soren, if someone posts something that is obviously "racist" (and the issue of "race", not religion - just to stop your usual tap dancing), what do you refer to it as?  Say, if someone was to call Nelson Mandella an "n-i-g-g-e-r"?   

So, if someone posts something that is obviously "bigoted" (towards religion), what do you refer to it as?   Say, if someone was to suggested that, "All Catholics kiss the Pope's arse and worship Satan"?

So, if someone continually criticises one religion and it's adherents, without let up and in an often unwarranted way, despite being criticised themselves for doing it, what do you call it?




If someone jumps to the accusation of 'racists!!!!' I condemn that.  Nelson Mandela was a black man. Nige r is an unpleasant word for black people but it's a word, like f vck for making love. Whatchagonna do? Honkey is a white person. Pom is an Englishman. Chink is an east Asian. Using these words is impolite and in most settings unwelcome. But blacks call each other n iggers all the time, so they are switched onto the po-mo irony of language in a way you, po-faced little heresy sniffer, never will be.


So, then I take it you're perfectly OK with and accepting of the concepts of racism - that one race is superior to another on the basis of biological determinism - the colour of one's skin, the shape of one's eyes/nose/ears/etc, determines one's psychological and intelligence characteristics, Soren?  Afterall the use of racist language is merely the outward expression of such beliefs, right?

Quote:
Bigoted - well, kiss my Lutheran arse, you little anti-religious equal opportunity knocker of all religions (except Islam of course). Is that bigoted? Is any disagreement with Islam bigoted? You never worry about religion, numpty, you only ever worry about Islam. Can you please model for us the correct criticism of Islam? (we will be waiting foir a very, very long time).


You seem to miss the point - again - perhaps deliberately.  Bigotry is when an argument's rightness or wrongness is determined on the basis of the belief and prejudice of the person making it, not on the basis of its merits.  ie, "He is a Muslim, therefore he is wrong!"  or "Catholics are all Papists and their church is corrupt, therefore they wrong!"   Doesn't matter whether the argument is wrong or right, what is more important is the source, Soren.  So therefore, the point, "Islam has a big emphasis on charity and respect for the aged," is immaterial, it is damned in the eyes of the bigot because it is Islam, not whether or not it is correct or commendable.    According to you, it seems, this is perfectly OK.   Which suggests what about your viewpoint?

Quote:
Criticising religion - why the bloody hell can't anyone criticise any religion as long as they want? There are people where who criticise the Libs and Labor, left and right without letup. What the bloody hell is so special about Islam (other than the underlying, seething threat of violence) that it cannot be criticised without letup? I don't think it has any redeeming features. Are you going to censor what I think?  Why can't Islam be criticised without letup?
So I have to cuddle Nazism for 10 minutes in every hour of criticism? 20 minutes? Half and half?


Comparing apples and oranges again, Soren?

So, I take it you have no problems with anti-Semitism?   Roll Eyes

Quote:
What I like about this Forum is that I can come across people like you, who do not exist in the real world because they would not dare to be so amazingly stupid in front of people who know them. 


You call it "stupidity", I call it common decency.  How often do you rail about a person's religion in front of them the way you go on about Islam?  You must lead a very lonely existence if you have no consideration of the feelings and emotions of others...    Roll Eyes




I think you are terrible, dishonest w anker and an idiot.

Can I think that? 
Or are you going to raid my mind and impose your stupid, fascist heresy-sniffing nonsense on what I think?



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42253
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #191 - Nov 16th, 2014 at 8:37pm
 
Soren wrote on Nov 16th, 2014 at 8:28pm:
I think you are terrible, dishonest w anker and an idiot.


What have I just posted which is "dishonest", Soren?   Roll Eyes

Quote:
Can I think that? 
Or are you going to raid my mind and impose your stupid, fascist heresy-sniffing nonsense on what I think?


Soren, you're welcome to think what you like but when you post it here don't expect me not to criticise it.  I'm all in favour of Freedom of Speech but don't assumed that equates to Freedom From Criticism.   Roll Eyes


Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #192 - Nov 17th, 2014 at 12:37pm
 
moses wrote on Nov 16th, 2014 at 5:27pm:
If they are criticizing muslims / islam you call it warranted.


Depends, is it warranted to criticise an entire religion and all it's followers for what a minority do?

So, how are you Christians getting on with your Paedophile thing again?   Oh, and that Christian Terrorism stuff?  Corruption in the Catholic Church?  Just so many things that Christianity needs to address, right?  Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy


Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #193 - Nov 17th, 2014 at 4:16pm
 
moses wrote: Quote:
If they are criticizing muslims / islam you call it warranted.

islam is a 7th century doctrine of hate speech, jihad, hijrah, taqiyya and kitman, terrorism, self alienation from normal society, etc.

muslims who accept the above religious philosophy (which causes muslims to be mass murderers etc. etc.) as being the final perfect word of their god allah, are just as guilty as any muslim who commits the atrocities.
 

Hotbreath wrote: Quote:
Depends, is it warranted to criticise an entire religion and all it's followers for what a minority do?

So, how are you Christians getting on with your Paedophile thing again?   Oh, and that Christian Terrorism stuff?  Corruption in the Catholic Church?  Just so many things that Christianity needs to address, right?


You once again have tried to use dishonesty as your defence of islamic terrorism. You desperately tried to shy away from the issue of doctrine being responsible for islamic atrocities.

Yes it is warranted to criticize all muslims who accept the islamic doctrine of hate speech, jihad, hijrah, taqiyya and kitman, terrorism, self alienation from normal society, etc. as being the final and perfect commands of allah / teachings of muhammad.

As for the Christians you allude to, I believe the law is following due process, as it should. I can find no Christian doctrine they are following so The full force of the law is the answer to the problem.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #194 - Nov 17th, 2014 at 5:14pm
 
moses wrote on Nov 17th, 2014 at 4:16pm:
moses wrote: Quote:
If they are criticizing muslims / islam you call it warranted.

islam is a 7th century doctrine of hate speech, jihad, hijrah, taqiyya and kitman, terrorism, self alienation from normal society, etc.

muslims who accept the above religious philosophy (which causes muslims to be mass murderers etc. etc.) as being the final perfect word of their god allah, are just as guilty as any muslim who commits the atrocities.
 

Hotbreath wrote: Quote:
Depends, is it warranted to criticise an entire religion and all it's followers for what a minority do?

So, how are you Christians getting on with your Paedophile thing again?   Oh, and that Christian Terrorism stuff?  Corruption in the Catholic Church?  Just so many things that Christianity needs to address, right?


You once again have tried to use dishonesty as your defence of islamic terrorism.


Where have I defended Terrorism?

Quote:
You desperately tried to shy away from the issue of doctrine being responsible for islamic atrocities.


You desperately shy away from any responsibility for the failings of your religion and your co-religionists.

Quote:
Yes it is warranted to criticize all muslims who accept the islamic doctrine of hate speech, jihad, hijrah, taqiyya and kitman, terrorism, self alienation from normal society, etc. as being the final and perfect commands of allah / teachings of muhammad.

As for the Christians you allude to, I believe the law is following due process, as it should. I can find no Christian doctrine they are following so The full force of the law is the answer to the problem.


Yet they believe they are following Christian doctrine.

Who are you to declare them apostates?  What authority do you have?  You're a nobody who is a notable racist/bigot/religious persecutor!  You try and shirk all responsibility for what your co-religionists are doing in the name of your religion.  They are promoting "hate speech, jihad, hijrah, taqiyya and kitman, terrorism, self alienation from normal society, etc." and you're acting as their apologist!  You should be deported immediately!  All your kind should be nuked, immediately!    Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 48
Send Topic Print