SweetLambo
|
Yadda wrote on Feb 23 rd, 2015 at 8:00am: Brian Ross wrote on Feb 22 nd, 2015 at 3:31pm: Soren wrote on Feb 21 st, 2015 at 9:22pm: Soren, ISIS is not Islam.
It represents as you well know, one small interpretation of Islam. Brian Ross, In what sense isn't ISIS and ISLAM the same beast ? e.g. ISIS supports jihad warfareISLAM supports jihad warfareISIS supports dhimmitudeISLAM supports dhimmitude[dhimmitude = = servitude/enslavement of Jews and Christians, enforcing a status of 'serfdom' upon Jews and Christians] ISIS supports stoning for adulteryISLAM supports stoning for adulteryISIS supports amputation for theftISLAM supports amputation for theftISIS supports the death penalty for apostasyISLAM supports the death penalty for apostasyISIS supports the supremacy of ISLAM being established through warfare against disbelieversISLAM supports the supremacy of ISLAM being established through warfare against disbelieversBrian Ross, Please, do tell us; In what sense is ISIS 'different' from ISLAM ? +++ FROM THE LIPS OF MOSLEMS....
FROM THE LIPS OF THE GRAND MUFTI OF SAUDI ARABIA.... Quote: Creed of the sword Mark Durie September 23, 2006 .....the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh Abdel Aziz al-Sheikh, issued a statement on the official Saudi news service, defending Muslims' divine right to resort to violence: "The spread of Islam has gone through several phases, secret and then public, in Mecca and Medina. God then authorised the faithful to defend themselves and to fight against those fighting them, which amounts to a right legitimised by God. This ... is quite reasonable, and God will not hate it." Saudi Arabia's most senior cleric also explained that war was never Islam's ancient founder, the prophet Mohammed's, first choice: "He gave three options: either accept Islam, or surrender and pay tax, and they will be allowed to remain in their land, observing their religion under the protection of Muslims." Thus, according to the Grand Mufti, the third option of violence against non-Muslims was only a last resort, if they refused to convert or surrender peacefully to the armies of Islam. .......At the beginning, in Mohammed's Meccan period, when he was weaker and his followers few, passages of the Koran encouraged peaceful relations and avoidance of conflict: "Invite (all) to the way of your Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious." (16:125) Later, after persecution and emigration to Medina in the first year of the Islamic calendar, authority was given to engage in warfare for defensive purposes only: "Fight in the path of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits, for God does not love transgressors." (2:190) As the Muslim community grew stronger and conflict with its neighbours did not abate, further revelations expanded the licence for waging war, until in Sura 9, regarded as one of the last chapters to be revealed, it is concluded that war against non-Muslims could be waged more or less at any time and in any place to extend the dominance of Islam.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20460114-601,00.html. IMAGE... http://www.raymondibrahim.com/_admin/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/129.jpegSheikh Yassir al-Burhami Quote:How Circumstance Dictates Islamic Behavior January 18, 2012
Preach Peace When Weak, Wage War When Strong
"...all notions of peace with non-Muslims are based on circumstance.
When Muslims are weak, they should be peaceful; when strong, they should go on the offensive." Sheikh Yassir al-Burhami - an ISLAMIC scholar and Egyptian Salafi leaderhttp://www.raymondibrahim.com/from-the-arab-world/how-circumstance-dictates-isla... Yes Yadda its hard for some to understand such basic things I know. If he wasn't just a pretend muslim sock I'd go to more trouble myself he is only here as a lonely old man looking for a rise. Nothing more.
|