Australian Politics Forum - More Islamophobic attacks?

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: More Islamophobic attacks? Reply #555 - May 8^th, 2015 at 6:56pm This just in:
Back to top	IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: More Islamophobic attacks? Reply #556 - May 8^th, 2015 at 6:59pm Karnal wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 6:55pm: But, old boy, you continue to deflect the very question of honesty in your own posts. no speaka da English, eh? We understand. No one has the right to not be offended. Present company excluded, dear boy.. Good to see you still not making sense. AT least you are consistent.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96250
Gender: male

Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #557 - May 8^th, 2015 at 7:01pm

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 6:12pm:

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:59pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:49pm:

By the way, you're article is rubbish. You should be ashamed trying to pass that off as intelligent .... or objective.

Pathetic.

Which part is not objective? Which part is not true?

Come on Soren. You're not this stupid, are you?

The old boy prefers the term mendacious, dear.

Cunning, no? Intelligence and integrity, innit.

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: More Islamophobic attacks? Reply #558 - May 8^th, 2015 at 7:01pm Here's another objective, rational, lucid criticsm of Islam. REad the book, this is just the intro.
Back to top	IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #559 - May 8^th, 2015 at 7:03pm

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 6:12pm:

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:59pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:49pm:

By the way, you're article is rubbish. You should be ashamed trying to pass that off as intelligent .... or objective.

Pathetic.

Which part is not objective? Which part is not true?

Come on Soren. You're not this stupid, are you?

I think you are. There is nothing Islamophobic in that short text. If you have argument with any part of it, state your argument.

But calling me stupid just shows that you are incapable of putting a coherent argument against anything, even something that you think is supremely deserving of criticism.

It just shows that you are not even shallow.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96250
Gender: male

Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #560 - May 8^th, 2015 at 7:04pm

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 6:59pm:

Karnal wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 6:55pm:

But, old boy, you continue to deflect the very question of honesty in your own posts. no speaka da English, eh?

We understand. No one has the right to not be offended. Present company excluded, dear boy..

Good to see you still not making sense..

Keep trying, old boy. You'll learn the language eventually.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96250
Gender: male

Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #561 - May 8^th, 2015 at 7:07pm

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 6:12pm:

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:59pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:49pm:

By the way, you're article is rubbish. You should be ashamed trying to pass that off as intelligent .... or objective.

Pathetic.

Which part is not objective? Which part is not true?

Come on Soren. You're not this stupid, are you?

I think you are. There is nothing Islamophobic in that short text. If you have argument with any part of it, state your argument.

But calling me stupid just shows that you are incapable of putting a coherent argument against anything, even something that you think is supremely deserving of criticism.

It just shows that you are not even shallow.

Now now, old chap, we won't have that.

Your own stupid and mendacious posts have so much depth.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35514
Gender: female

Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #562 - May 8^th, 2015 at 7:22pm

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 6:12pm:

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:59pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:49pm:

By the way, you're article is rubbish. You should be ashamed trying to pass that off as intelligent .... or objective.

Pathetic.

Which part is not objective? Which part is not true?

Come on Soren. You're not this stupid, are you?

I think you are. There is nothing Islamophobic in that short text. If you have argument with any part of it, state your argument.

But calling me stupid just shows that you are incapable of putting a coherent argument against anything, even something that you think is supremely deserving of criticism.

It just shows that you are not even shallow.

Just wow Soren. It is so much crap. It's even worse that an Andrew Bolt piece, At least he uses quotes a stuff to prove his agenda, however taken out of context they are.

This is just some rather questionable human beating his own chest about his right to question Islam and how we are being suppressed from critisising Islam all while making no actual criticisms ... just whining about a couple of incidents he didn't like.

He doesn't even stop congratulating himself for his limited intellect until the second to last paragraph.

It is seeded with snide insinuations and relies upon the reader already having a healthy dislike of Islam.

At no point throughout the piece is the author's opinion in question. It's an opinion piece ... and a very poorly researched and considered one.

It is NOT objective. It is NOT clever. It is NOT a critique of Islam. It is NOT any good.

It's poo.

Now will you answer our questions?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 138649
Gender: male

Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #563 - May 8^th, 2015 at 7:46pm

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 6:12pm:

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:59pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:49pm:

By the way, you're article is rubbish. You should be ashamed trying to pass that off as intelligent .... or objective.

Pathetic.

Which part is not objective? Which part is not true?

Come on Soren. You're not this stupid, are you?

Back to top

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #564 - May 8^th, 2015 at 9:03pm

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 7:22pm:

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 6:12pm:

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:59pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:49pm:

By the way, you're article is rubbish. You should be ashamed trying to pass that off as intelligent .... or objective.

Pathetic.

Which part is not objective? Which part is not true?

Come on Soren. You're not this stupid, are you?

I think you are. There is nothing Islamophobic in that short text. If you have argument with any part of it, state your argument.

But calling me stupid just shows that you are incapable of putting a coherent argument against anything, even something that you think is supremely deserving of criticism.

It just shows that you are not even shallow.

Just wow Soren. It is so much crap. It's even worse that an Andrew Bolt piece, At least he uses quotes a stuff to prove his agenda, however taken out of context they are.

This is just some rather questionable human beating his own chest about his right to question Islam and how we are being suppressed from critisising Islam all while making no actual criticisms ... just whining about a couple of incidents he didn't like.

He doesn't even stop congratulating himself for his limited intellect until the second to last paragraph.

It is seeded with snide insinuations and relies upon the reader already having a healthy dislike of Islam.

At no point throughout the piece is the author's opinion in question. It's an opinion piece ... and a very poorly researched and considered one.

It is NOT objective. It is NOT clever. It is NOT a critique of Islam. It is NOT any good.

It's poo.

Now will you answer our questions?

Lot of puffery but no coherent argument.

Put an objective, clever, good, rational argument - you can't.

Shouting down others is the sport of fools like you. You could not present a reasoned case if your life was in the balance. All you can say is 'I don't like it"
That is your absolute outer limit. You bleat, for you can do no otherwise.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35514
Gender: female

Re: More Islamophobic attacks?
Reply #565 - May 8^th, 2015 at 9:16pm

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 9:03pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 7:22pm:

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 7:03pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 6:12pm:

Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:59pm:

mothra wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 5:49pm:

By the way, you're article is rubbish. You should be ashamed trying to pass that off as intelligent .... or objective.

Pathetic.

Which part is not objective? Which part is not true?

Come on Soren. You're not this stupid, are you?

I think you are. There is nothing Islamophobic in that short text. If you have argument with any part of it, state your argument.

But calling me stupid just shows that you are incapable of putting a coherent argument against anything, even something that you think is supremely deserving of criticism.

It just shows that you are not even shallow.

Just wow Soren. It is so much crap. It's even worse that an Andrew Bolt piece, At least he uses quotes a stuff to prove his agenda, however taken out of context they are.

This is just some rather questionable human beating his own chest about his right to question Islam and how we are being suppressed from critisising Islam all while making no actual criticisms ... just whining about a couple of incidents he didn't like.

He doesn't even stop congratulating himself for his limited intellect until the second to last paragraph.

It is seeded with snide insinuations and relies upon the reader already having a healthy dislike of Islam.

At no point throughout the piece is the author's opinion in question. It's an opinion piece ... and a very poorly researched and considered one.

It is NOT objective. It is NOT clever. It is NOT a critique of Islam. It is NOT any good.

It's poo.

Now will you answer our questions?

Lot of puffery but no coherent argument.

Put an objective, clever, good, rational argument - you can't.

Shouting down others is the sport of fools like you. You could not present a reasoned case if your life was in the balance. All you can say is 'I don't like it"
That is your absolute outer limit. You bleat, for you can do no otherwise.

MORE deflection.

Can you answer the questions Soren? OR can you NOT answer the questions?

By the way, my critique of that article was giving it more attention than it deserved. It was poo.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Soren Gold Member Offline Posts: 25654 Gender:	Re: More Islamophobic attacks? Reply #566 - May 8^th, 2015 at 9:33pm What's the question mutha?
Back to top	IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35514 Gender:	Re: More Islamophobic attacks? Reply #567 - May 8^th, 2015 at 9:35pm Soren wrote on May 8^th, 2015 at 9:33pm: What's the question mutha? The questions we have been asking you for days. Oh please say you'll answer them. I'm so hoping you do. Scroll back, there's a good Scando.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35514 Gender:	Re: More Islamophobic attacks? Reply #568 - May 8^th, 2015 at 9:41pm The fact that you ask "what question" ( i clearly said questionS ... twice) goes quite a long way into evidencing that you don't actually read our posts at all. Too busy reacting for a quiet read Soren?
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35514 Gender:	Re: More Islamophobic attacks? Reply #569 - May 8^th, 2015 at 10:03pm ,,,,aaaaaand he's gone again. Gandalf, you know how you said you were entertaining Soren because you thought he may be more intelligent than your run of the mill Islamophobe? I think you might need to reconsider,
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged