Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Do we have the right to more information on this event ?



« Created by: buzzanddidj on: Sep 26th, 2014 at 9:43pm »

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
The right outcome (Read 3362 times)
Setanta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16644
Northern NSW
Gender: male
Re: The right outcome
Reply #45 - Sep 27th, 2014 at 1:43am
 
Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 1:06am:
Sort of has a Warren Lanfranchi feel to it.. we need more facts...


Except Smithy didn't get stabbed, unfortunately, it would have saved lives further on if the prick was killed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The right outcome
Reply #46 - Sep 27th, 2014 at 1:30pm
 
what a stupid poll question....
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Phemanderac
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3507
Gender: male
Re: The right outcome
Reply #47 - Sep 29th, 2014 at 12:46pm
 
buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 9:31pm:
Phemanderac wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 6:49pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 6:43pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 6:08pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 6:02pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 5:59pm:
DaS Energy wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 5:35pm:
adelcrow wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 5:28pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Sep 26th, 2014 at 5:25pm:
You should paste a link to other peoples work Longy.....

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/opinion/david-penberthy-police-reaction-to-nu...

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Crikey now Longy is ripping off Adelaides star dickhead Penberthy  Grin Grin



Police make no mention of the culprit carrying any ISI Flag, yet Penberthy does. makes Penberthy a liar or ill qualified for journalism!


POlice have made repeated mention of him carrying an ISIL plag around the suburbs and shopping centres as have people who saw it. 



Please share.



why did the cops invite him to a meeting in the first place???






I've got a few questions of my OWN

1/ Why was this interview arranged in such an unorthodox manner - clandestinely, in the police station car-park - and not follow standard procedure of being RECORDED in an interview room ?

2/ Why did police call in the bomb squad - after the subject was shot dead - to do a thorough search of the police station ?
... when it was quite clear he had been nowhere NEAR the building - inside or out ?

( ... other than on the request of the police media unit ?)





I think you will find that meeting outside of the Police station is not unusual for a little "talk".
The modern vernacular is "community policing"





I'm not BUYING it


- but as you seem to have experienced more of these type of unusual
"interviews"
than I have
- I'll let it PASS

... and the story behind the
bomb squad show'n'tell
is ?




Not sure if (or what for that matter) you are implying by the statement about my level of experience with "informal" interviews. However, it would seem that I do have a bit more experience in that aspect than you, given it did not particularly stand out as anything unusual. I will say though, in my line of work I have had more than a little to do with Police and have witnessed the positive outcomes from their "informal" approaches when it has been appropriate. This clearly was not one of those appropriate situations and, consequently, two Police were injured and, as I have said, the young man in question is dead.

With regard to the bomb squad business, the best I can do is speculate. So, that was either an addon for publicity (I am not convinced of that though, but it is possible), a response to other intel not shared broadly or at worst a standard practice for security...

My money would be on the "other intel" that has not been shared publicly. That is the fun bit about us all being able to make up our own minds though, given we are not presented with full and thorough information from any media source.

Which would be my other point - our media in this country is by no means worthy of being called professional. Any money that they're paid is under false pretences.
Back to top
 

On the 26th of January you are all invited to celebrate little white penal day...

"They're not rules as such, more like guidelines" Pirates of the Caribbean..
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14213
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: The right outcome
Reply #48 - Sep 29th, 2014 at 3:14pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 1:30pm:
what a stupid poll question....





Let me
dumb it down
a bit


Answer
NO
- if you believe the details should be "sealed" as an
OPERATIONAL MATTER


Answer
YES
- if you believe the public have a right to know ALL of the details under our
freedom of information





Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The right outcome
Reply #49 - Sep 29th, 2014 at 3:45pm
 
buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 3:14pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 1:30pm:
what a stupid poll question....





Let me
dumb it down
a bit


Answer
NO
- if you believe the details should be "sealed" as an
OPERATIONAL MATTER


Answer
YES
- if you believe the public have a right to know ALL of the details under our
freedom of information







the poll is stupid because of the lack of a third option.  I do not condone secrecy but nor do I see there is any reason for the public to have 100% information either.  Once the general details are known, the rest is prurient interest or for the legal processes.

THAT is why it is stupid, like most of your polls.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Kat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female
Re: The right outcome
Reply #50 - Sep 29th, 2014 at 4:04pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 3:45pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 3:14pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 1:30pm:
what a stupid poll question....





Let me
dumb it down
a bit


Answer
NO
- if you believe the details should be "sealed" as an
OPERATIONAL MATTER


Answer
YES
- if you believe the public have a right to know ALL of the details under our
freedom of information







the poll is stupid because of the lack of a third option.  I do not condone secrecy but nor do I see there is any reason for the public to have 100% information either.  Once the general details are known, the rest is prurient interest or for the legal processes.

THAT is why it is stupid, like most of your polls.



You should go have a look at some of AP's... every option the same, and often not even relevant
to the thread, but just anti-left BS.
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The right outcome
Reply #51 - Sep 29th, 2014 at 4:20pm
 
Kat wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 4:04pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 3:45pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 3:14pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 1:30pm:
what a stupid poll question....





Let me
dumb it down
a bit


Answer
NO
- if you believe the details should be "sealed" as an
OPERATIONAL MATTER


Answer
YES
- if you believe the public have a right to know ALL of the details under our
freedom of information







the poll is stupid because of the lack of a third option.  I do not condone secrecy but nor do I see there is any reason for the public to have 100% information either.  Once the general details are known, the rest is prurient interest or for the legal processes.

THAT is why it is stupid, like most of your polls.



You should go have a look at some of AP's... every option the same, and often not even relevant
to the thread, but just anti-left BS.


I don't disagree.  most polls placed on this site are very close to worthless... which given the respondents in general is a fair thing.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14213
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: The right outcome
Reply #52 - Sep 29th, 2014 at 4:23pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 3:45pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 3:14pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 1:30pm:
what a stupid poll question....





Let me
dumb it down
a bit


Answer
NO
- if you believe the details should be "sealed" as an
OPERATIONAL MATTER


Answer
YES
- if you believe the public have a right to know ALL of the details under our
freedom of information







I do not condone secrecy but nor do I see there is any reason for the public to have 100% information either. 






Your vote of
NO
has been recorded in poll results - against the SEVEN votes for
YES






Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 29th, 2014 at 4:45pm by buzzanddidj »  

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: The right outcome
Reply #53 - Sep 29th, 2014 at 5:25pm
 
buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 4:23pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 3:45pm:
buzzanddidj wrote on Sep 29th, 2014 at 3:14pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 1:30pm:
what a stupid poll question....





Let me
dumb it down
a bit


Answer
NO
- if you believe the details should be "sealed" as an
OPERATIONAL MATTER


Answer
YES
- if you believe the public have a right to know ALL of the details under our
freedom of information







I do not condone secrecy but nor do I see there is any reason for the public to have 100% information either. 






Your vote of
NO
has been recorded in poll results - against the SEVEN votes for
YES









being in a separate category to the clowns on a poll with meaningless questions is really one of those 'couldn't care less' moments.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print