Australian Politics Forum - No more ‘anchor babies’

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18574
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #15 - Oct 1^st, 2014 at 11:00am

John Smith wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 7:51am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 6:36am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 6:33am:

Good job Scotty boy! Send the babies to Cambodia, they make nice soup......at least it's a change from rat.

There's nothing stopping them from going home at any time they choose.

home where? they were born here?

The Kiwi racing driver Scott Dixon was born in Brisbane yet he says he is from New Zealand which is where his parents are from.

Mr Dixon denies being Aussie despite being born here.

It appears there are many that deny being Aussie despite being born here.

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74797
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #16 - Oct 1^st, 2014 at 11:05am

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 11:00am:

John Smith wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 7:51am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 6:36am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 6:33am:

Good job Scotty boy! Send the babies to Cambodia, they make nice soup......at least it's a change from rat.

There's nothing stopping them from going home at any time they choose.

home where? they were born here?

The Kiwi racing driver Scott Dixon was born in Brisbane yet he says he is from New Zealand which is where his parents are from.

Mr Dixon denies being Aussie despite being born here.

It appears there are many that deny being Aussie despite being born here.

and? as an adult that is his choice to make ...... it's a very different proposition from 'who' a country may recognise as its citizen. Say, for example, the family come from Syria. ... what if the Syrian govt. refuses to accept the baby as a citizen? then what do we do? leave him in detention forever?

a baby has no choice and has no emotional attachment to any place other than its mums breasts

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18574
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #17 - Oct 1^st, 2014 at 11:16am

John Smith wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 11:05am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 11:00am:

John Smith wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 7:51am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 6:36am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 6:33am:

Good job Scotty boy! Send the babies to Cambodia, they make nice soup......at least it's a change from rat.

There's nothing stopping them from going home at any time they choose.

home where? they were born here?

The Kiwi racing driver Scott Dixon was born in Brisbane yet he says he is from New Zealand which is where his parents are from.

Mr Dixon denies being Aussie despite being born here.

It appears there are many that deny being Aussie despite being born here.

and? as an adult that is his choice to make ...... it's a very different proposition from 'who' a country may recognise as its citizen. Say, for example, the family come from Syria. ... what if the Syrian govt. refuses to accept the baby as a citizen? then what do we do? leave him in detention forever?

a baby has no choice and has no emotional attachment to any place other than its mums breasts

Scott Dixon claims he was born here while his parents were visiting Australia, he says he is 100% Kiwi.

Which government in Syria are you talking about- Assad or the Islamic state?

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74797
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #18 - Oct 1^st, 2014 at 11:17am

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 11:16am:

John Smith wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 11:05am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 11:00am:

John Smith wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 7:51am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 6:36am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Oct 1^st, 2014 at 6:33am:

Good job Scotty boy! Send the babies to Cambodia, they make nice soup......at least it's a change from rat.

There's nothing stopping them from going home at any time they choose.

home where? they were born here?

The Kiwi racing driver Scott Dixon was born in Brisbane yet he says he is from New Zealand which is where his parents are from.

Mr Dixon denies being Aussie despite being born here.

It appears there are many that deny being Aussie despite being born here.

and? as an adult that is his choice to make ...... it's a very different proposition from 'who' a country may recognise as its citizen. Say, for example, the family come from Syria. ... what if the Syrian govt. refuses to accept the baby as a citizen? then what do we do? leave him in detention forever?

a baby has no choice and has no emotional attachment to any place other than its mums breasts

Scott Dixon claims he was born here while his parents were visiting Australia, he says he is 100% Kiwi.

Which government in Syria are you talking about- Assad or the Islamic state?

you're not listening .... it doesn't matter what Mr Dixon says, its what the govt, says ... any govt.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23619 Gender:	Re: No more ‘anchor babies’ Reply #19 - Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 1:15am clearly daniel meers is an idiot. How can a refugee be illegal????
Back to top	Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of. IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: No more ‘anchor babies’ Reply #20 - Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:34am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 1:15am: clearly daniel meers is an idiot. How can a refugee be illegal???? easily. break the law. it is actually that simple. and being a refugee does not imply right of access. it only implies right to be considered a refugee.
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #21 - Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:47am

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:34am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 1:15am:

clearly daniel meers is an idiot. How can a refugee be illegal???? Grin

easily. break the law.

it is actually that simple. and being a refugee does not imply right of access. it only implies right to be considered a refugee.

Fck me you've become an absolute idiot. Please stop trying to pretend that you understand the migration act and the refugee convention because you CLEARLY don't. By definition they are people who have been granted asylum, hence NEVER anything illegal under our domestic laws and international laws we have agreed to.
And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

Fck, it's like a competition to who can have less brains between you and armpit.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #22 - Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 11:44am

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:47am:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:34am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 1:15am:

clearly daniel meers is an idiot. How can a refugee be illegal???? Grin

easily. break the law.

it is actually that simple. and being a refugee does not imply right of access. it only implies right to be considered a refugee.

Fck me you've become an absolute idiot. Please stop trying to pretend that you understand the migration act and the refugee convention because you CLEARLY don't. By definition they are people who have been granted asylum, hence NEVER anything illegal under our domestic laws and international laws we have agreed to.
And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

Fck, it's like a competition to who can have less brains between you and armpit.

some interesting statements there and a few absolute whoppers.

Arriving here without permission is ILLEGAL. no doubt about it. Claiming asylum is a right but that does not change the fact of the illegal entry

But I want to retain my mirth for this one... Quote:

And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

In the words of Pauling Hanson... 'please explain'

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74797
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #23 - Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:36pm

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 11:44am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:47am:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:34am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 1:15am:

clearly daniel meers is an idiot. How can a refugee be illegal???? Grin

easily. break the law.

it is actually that simple. and being a refugee does not imply right of access. it only implies right to be considered a refugee.

Fck me you've become an absolute idiot. Please stop trying to pretend that you understand the migration act and the refugee convention because you CLEARLY don't. By definition they are people who have been granted asylum, hence NEVER anything illegal under our domestic laws and international laws we have agreed to.
And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

Fck, it's like a competition to who can have less brains between you and armpit.

some interesting statements there and a few absolute whoppers.

Arriving here without permission is ILLEGAL. no doubt about it. Claiming asylum is a right but that does not change the fact of the illegal entry

But I want to retain my mirth for this one... Quote:

And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

In the words of Pauling Hanson... 'please explain'

you are breaking the law if you smash a shop window , however if you do it because the building is on fire, you are doing nothing illegal

simple enough for you longie?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #24 - Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:38pm

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 11:44am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:47am:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:34am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 1:15am:

clearly daniel meers is an idiot. How can a refugee be illegal???? Grin

easily. break the law.

it is actually that simple. and being a refugee does not imply right of access. it only implies right to be considered a refugee.

Fck me you've become an absolute idiot. Please stop trying to pretend that you understand the migration act and the refugee convention because you CLEARLY don't. By definition they are people who have been granted asylum, hence NEVER anything illegal under our domestic laws and international laws we have agreed to.
And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

Fck, it's like a competition to who can have less brains between you and armpit.

some interesting statements there and a few absolute whoppers.

Arriving here without permission is ILLEGAL. no doubt about it. Claiming asylum is a right but that does not change the fact of the illegal entry

But I want to retain my mirth for this one... Quote:

And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

In the words of Pauling Hanson... 'please explain'

You continue to show your outright stupidity.
1. Arriving here without permissions is NOT illegal. That has NO DOUBT about it. Grin

2. Even if it were illegal, it doesn't make a refugee an ILLEGAL refugee. Idiot.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #25 - Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:41pm

John Smith wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:36pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 11:44am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:47am:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:34am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 1:15am:

clearly daniel meers is an idiot. How can a refugee be illegal???? Grin

easily. break the law.

it is actually that simple. and being a refugee does not imply right of access. it only implies right to be considered a refugee.

Fck me you've become an absolute idiot. Please stop trying to pretend that you understand the migration act and the refugee convention because you CLEARLY don't. By definition they are people who have been granted asylum, hence NEVER anything illegal under our domestic laws and international laws we have agreed to.
And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

Fck, it's like a competition to who can have less brains between you and armpit.

some interesting statements there and a few absolute whoppers.

Arriving here without permission is ILLEGAL. no doubt about it. Claiming asylum is a right but that does not change the fact of the illegal entry

But I want to retain my mirth for this one... Quote:

And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

In the words of Pauling Hanson... 'please explain'

you are breaking the law if you smash a shop window , however if you do it because the building is on fire, you are doing nothing illegal

simple enough for you longie?

actually, legally you ARE still doing something illegal. What changes is that you have a valid DEFENCE against the act. It might seem technical to you but it is a real distinction and is very apt here. Seeking asylum after arriving illegally is fine but you are still committing an illegal act that has a DEFENCE of seeking and being granted asylum. IF you are not granted asylum you have no defence.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #26 - Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:43pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:38pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 11:44am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:47am:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:34am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 1:15am:

clearly daniel meers is an idiot. How can a refugee be illegal???? Grin

easily. break the law.

it is actually that simple. and being a refugee does not imply right of access. it only implies right to be considered a refugee.

Fck me you've become an absolute idiot. Please stop trying to pretend that you understand the migration act and the refugee convention because you CLEARLY don't. By definition they are people who have been granted asylum, hence NEVER anything illegal under our domestic laws and international laws we have agreed to.
And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

Fck, it's like a competition to who can have less brains between you and armpit.

some interesting statements there and a few absolute whoppers.

Arriving here without permission is ILLEGAL. no doubt about it. Claiming asylum is a right but that does not change the fact of the illegal entry

But I want to retain my mirth for this one... Quote:

And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

In the words of Pauling Hanson... 'please explain'

You continue to show your outright stupidity.
1. Arriving here without permissions is NOT illegal. That has NO DOUBT about it. Grin

2. Even if it were illegal, it doesn't make a refugee an ILLEGAL refugee. Idiot.

you've been listening toe SHY and peccahead and other drongos. it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission. Or why do you think we even have a passport and visa system? if you come here without permission it is clearly ILLEGAL. now if you were peccahead you would say it is UNLAWFUL instead and pretend like there is a difference.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74797
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #27 - Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:45pm

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:41pm:

actually, legally you ARE still doing something illegal. What changes is that you have a valid DEFENCE against the act. It might seem technical to you but it is a real distinction and is very apt here. Seeking asylum after arriving illegally is fine but you are still committing an illegal act that has a DEFENCE of seeking and being granted asylum. IF you are not granted asylum you have no defence.

it is not a defence ... whats to defend? you've done nothing illegal and will never be charged ... no defence necessary

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74797 Gender:	Re: No more ‘anchor babies’ Reply #28 - Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:46pm longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:43pm: it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty. They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #29 - Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:48pm

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 12:38pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 11:44am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:47am:

longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 8:34am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2014 at 1:15am:

clearly daniel meers is an idiot. How can a refugee be illegal???? Grin

easily. break the law.

it is actually that simple. and being a refugee does not imply right of access. it only implies right to be considered a refugee.

Fck me you've become an absolute idiot. Please stop trying to pretend that you understand the migration act and the refugee convention because you CLEARLY don't. By definition they are people who have been granted asylum, hence NEVER anything illegal under our domestic laws and international laws we have agreed to.
And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

Fck, it's like a competition to who can have less brains between you and armpit.

some interesting statements there and a few absolute whoppers.

Arriving here without permission is ILLEGAL. no doubt about it. Claiming asylum is a right but that does not change the fact of the illegal entry

But I want to retain my mirth for this one... Quote:

And breaking the law doesn't necessarily mean you've done something illegal.

In the words of Pauling Hanson... 'please explain'

You continue to show your outright stupidity.
1. Arriving here without permissions is NOT illegal. That has NO DOUBT about it. Grin

2. Even if it were illegal, it doesn't make a refugee an ILLEGAL refugee. Idiot.

you've been listening toe SHY and peccahead and other drongos. it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission. Or why do you think we even have a passport and visa system? if you come here without permission it is clearly ILLEGAL. now if you were peccahead you would say it is UNLAWFUL instead and pretend like there is a difference.

Idiot, read our migration act. Then come back and see if you still want to argue that. Seriously, talk about stupid, to be told over and over and to still continue with the same nonsense.

And even if we allow for bogans such as yourself to interchange meanings of words, it STILL doesn't make a REFUGEE ILLEGAL. bugger me. Talk about dumb.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged