Home Articles Forum Wiki Poll Garden Contact

 
 
 
  
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

  Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › Federal Politics › No more ‘anchor babies’
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 9
Send Topic Print
No more ‘anchor babies’ (Read 8677 times)
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #30 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:48pm  
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come

Don't bother with him. He's become dumber than Maqqa used to be.
Back to top
 
Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Animal Mutha
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #31 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm  
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #32 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm  
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

Back to top
 
Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Animal Mutha
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #33 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:57pm  
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

The refugee convention is designed for actual refugees and not plumbers from Pakistan who are chasing the money.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74797
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #34 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:00pm  
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.


if they're asylum seekers, we are .... the fact that the libs pick and choose which agreements they'll honour or break is irrelevant ...

of course you could always petition the libs to withdraw from the UN treaty if you like?
Back to top
 
Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74797
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #35 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:01pm  
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

The refugee convention is designed for actual refugees and not plumbers from Pakistan who are chasing the money.


over 90% of applicants were found to be genuine ... leave your fantasy for someone who'll believe it
Back to top
 
Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Animal Mutha
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #36 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:05pm  
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:01pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

The refugee convention is designed for actual refugees and not plumbers from Pakistan who are chasing the money.


over 90% of applicants were found to be genuine ... leave your fantasy for someone who'll believe it
By whom? Certainly not our current government. Just because some do-gooder says so doesn't make it fact.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74797
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #37 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:07pm  
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:05pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:01pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

The refugee convention is designed for actual refugees and not plumbers from Pakistan who are chasing the money.


over 90% of applicants were found to be genuine ... leave your fantasy for someone who'll believe it
By whom? Certainly not our current government. Just because some do-gooder says so doesn't make it fact.


By the govt. of Australia

its not the politicians who determine their status, its the public servants working for the dept. of immigration ... are you trying to claim they are all incompetant?
Back to top
 
Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #38 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:10pm  
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

The refugee convention is designed for actual refugees and not plumbers from Pakistan who are chasing the money.


and the plumbers from Pakistan won't be assessed as refugees unless they were plumbers from Pakistan fleeing persecution for political reasons, or perhaps for plumbing reasons.   

So I ask...what is your point? Grin
Back to top
 
Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #39 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:10pm  
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:05pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:01pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

The refugee convention is designed for actual refugees and not plumbers from Pakistan who are chasing the money.


over 90% of applicants were found to be genuine ... leave your fantasy for someone who'll believe it
By whom? Certainly not our current government. Just because some do-gooder says so doesn't make it fact.

I don't quite think that you nutjob conservatives have any ability to determine what is and what isn't a fact. Grin
Back to top
 
Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Animal Mutha
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #40 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:11pm  
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:07pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:05pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:01pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

The refugee convention is designed for actual refugees and not plumbers from Pakistan who are chasing the money.


over 90% of applicants were found to be genuine ... leave your fantasy for someone who'll believe it
By whom? Certainly not our current government. Just because some do-gooder says so doesn't make it fact.


By the govt. of Australia

its not the politicians who determine their status, its the public servants working for the dept. of immigration ... are you trying to claim they are all incompetant?
I'd put money on it they are incompetent. The people in Syria displaced by ISIL are refugees. Some Tamil that was part of a war that's been over for a decade and hates the fact they lost isn't. Some Iranian who wants to sit on a beach and perv at women in bikinis isn't. That's why they have been knocked by and are enjoying some tropical anarchy.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #41 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:13pm  
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:11pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:07pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:05pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:01pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

The refugee convention is designed for actual refugees and not plumbers from Pakistan who are chasing the money.


over 90% of applicants were found to be genuine ... leave your fantasy for someone who'll believe it
By whom? Certainly not our current government. Just because some do-gooder says so doesn't make it fact.


By the govt. of Australia

its not the politicians who determine their status, its the public servants working for the dept. of immigration ... are you trying to claim they are all incompetant?
I'd put money on it they are incompetent. The people in Syria displaced by ISIL are refugees. Some Tamil that was part of a war that's been over for a decade and hates the fact they lost isn't. Some Iranian who wants to sit on a beach and perv at women in bikinis isn't. That's why they have been knocked by and are enjoying some tropical anarchy.

you do understand that each case is individual right? A person sitting in a town north east of ISIL "territory" where there has been no ISIL influence can hardly leave Syria and claim refuge. Just like a tamil who is still being abused/raped/kidnapped etc in Sri Lanka is still a refugee regardless of the state of the war.

You seem to be like longie - lacking brain to comprehend what the refugee convention and our migration act actually entail.
Back to top
 
Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Animal Mutha
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #42 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:17pm  
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:13pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:11pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:07pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:05pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:01pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

The refugee convention is designed for actual refugees and not plumbers from Pakistan who are chasing the money.


over 90% of applicants were found to be genuine ... leave your fantasy for someone who'll believe it
By whom? Certainly not our current government. Just because some do-gooder says so doesn't make it fact.


By the govt. of Australia

its not the politicians who determine their status, its the public servants working for the dept. of immigration ... are you trying to claim they are all incompetant?
I'd put money on it they are incompetent. The people in Syria displaced by ISIL are refugees. Some Tamil that was part of a war that's been over for a decade and hates the fact they lost isn't. Some Iranian who wants to sit on a beach and perv at women in bikinis isn't. That's why they have been knocked by and are enjoying some tropical anarchy.

you do understand that each case is individual right? A person sitting in a town north east of ISIL "territory" where there has been no ISIL influence can hardly leave Syria and claim refuge. Just like a tamil who is still being abused/raped/kidnapped etc in Sri Lanka is still a refugee regardless of the state of the war.

You seem to be like longie - lacking brain to comprehend what the refugee convention and our migration act actually entail.
You'll just have to cry yourself a refugee river all the way to do-gooder nirvana because they aint getting in sweetheart. Cry Cry Cry Cry
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74797
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #43 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:44pm  
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:11pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:07pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:05pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:01pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

The refugee convention is designed for actual refugees and not plumbers from Pakistan who are chasing the money.


over 90% of applicants were found to be genuine ... leave your fantasy for someone who'll believe it
By whom? Certainly not our current government. Just because some do-gooder says so doesn't make it fact.


By the govt. of Australia

its not the politicians who determine their status, its the public servants working for the dept. of immigration ... are you trying to claim they are all incompetant?
I'd put money on it they are incompetent. The people in Syria displaced by ISIL are refugees. Some Tamil that was part of a war that's been over for a decade and hates the fact they lost isn't. Some Iranian who wants to sit on a beach and perv at women in bikinis isn't. That's why they have been knocked by and are enjoying some tropical anarchy.


they're the same public servants now working for Morriscum ... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

you're an idiot if you think everyone else gets it wrong and only you are smart enough to work it out.
Back to top
 
Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Animal Mutha
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 83
Gender: male
Re: No more ‘anchor babies’
Reply #44 - Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:47pm  
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:44pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:11pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:07pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:05pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 1:01pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:57pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:55pm:
Animal Mutha wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:51pm:
John Smith wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 2nd, 2014 at 12:43pm:
it is illegal to enter this and every other country without permission


but they have permission, we gave them that permission when we signed the UN treaty.  They don't need to give permission to each individual asylum seeker before they come
And our government doesn't have to give them permission to enter either.

well they can rescind the refugee convention if they like. But until then they do.

The refugee convention is designed for actual refugees and not plumbers from Pakistan who are chasing the money.


over 90% of applicants were found to be genuine ... leave your fantasy for someone who'll believe it
By whom? Certainly not our current government. Just because some do-gooder says so doesn't make it fact.


By the govt. of Australia

its not the politicians who determine their status, its the public servants working for the dept. of immigration ... are you trying to claim they are all incompetant?
I'd put money on it they are incompetent. The people in Syria displaced by ISIL are refugees. Some Tamil that was part of a war that's been over for a decade and hates the fact they lost isn't. Some Iranian who wants to sit on a beach and perv at women in bikinis isn't. That's why they have been knocked by and are enjoying some tropical anarchy.


they're the same public servants now working for Morriscum ... Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

you're an idiot if you think everyone else gets it wrong and only you are smart enough to work it out.
Who's the idiot. They certainly aren't taking your line of approach, are they??
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 9
Send Topic Print
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
 
 

  « Forum ‹ Board Top of this page

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge