Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
Women in Solidarity with Hijabs (Read 11173 times)
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #45 - Oct 5th, 2014 at 6:55pm
 
freediver wrote on Oct 5th, 2014 at 3:55pm:
Gandalf has spent most of the discussion pretending my question about the right to mock Muhammed is a question about whether he supports terrorism, or section 18c, or denying the holocaust - basically any question where he can provide an answer that makes him and his fellow Muslims appear mainstream.


As opposed to FD, who pretends to articulate the sentiments of mainstream Australian muslims without a shred of evidence - apart from confused garble about the OIC (not affiliated in any way with Australia) or what Gandalf allegedly said or attempting to draw some sort of contrast with mainstream Australians using the 18c debate - even though that debate demonstrated that mainstream Aussies are the exact same enemies of freedom that FD pins on muslims, and muslims alone.

He comes up with absolute gems like muslims are "chipping away" at our freedoms "at every opportunity" - an outrageously unsubstantiated and unjustified claim, which when pressed can only come up with a twisted version of islamic doctrine that muslims overwhelmingly *DON'T* share - as his "evidence".

All the while he either ignores are jumps hoops to spinelessly apologise for actual threats to our freedom - like the outlawing of holocaust denial, and the new anti-terrorism laws - which actual non-hypocritical campaigners for civil liberties have denounced.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #46 - Oct 5th, 2014 at 6:57pm
 
bump
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #47 - Oct 5th, 2014 at 7:25pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 3rd, 2014 at 12:42pm:
A new social media campaign encouraging women to take a photo of themselves wearing a head scarf to show support for Muslim women and religious freedom has been launched.


Here's another ignorant leftwing journalist who hasn't done her homework ... (being enthusiastically championed by gandalf as yet another Useful Idiot, despite knowing she hasn't a clue what she's talking about).

The hijab has nothing to do with 'religious freedom' as it's nothing more than a cultural affectation that even their own Islamic scholars concede is a piece of sartorial idiosyncrasy.

If the hijab is a religious imperative, then all Muslim women would be wearing it, instead of only a minority of immigrant Muslim women.

The head of the Cairo university once banned the hijab being worn on campus because it was nothing but a piece of frippery ('showy or unnecessary ornament in architecture, dress, or language') ~ and did nothing but promote division and animosity. 

Nice try, gandalf, but no sheeps' eye-balls in goat's curd this time.




Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2014 at 7:04am by Lord Herbert »  
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #48 - Oct 5th, 2014 at 7:32pm
 
wally1 wrote on Oct 3rd, 2014 at 3:03pm:
Maybe convert to islam and hit up the muslim matrimonial site that was endorsed by the board.


Hey! I'm up for anything at this time in my life. My Muslim workmates wanted me to convert, but then I told them it wouldn't be any good because I'm an atheist. They left me alone after that. They knew the Great Satan had claimed me for His own, and I was beyond redemption.   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Raven
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2981
Around
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #49 - Oct 6th, 2014 at 5:11am
 
Yadda wrote on Oct 5th, 2014 at 9:31am:
Raven wrote on Oct 5th, 2014 at 3:27am:
Yadda wrote on Oct 3rd, 2014 at 10:49pm:
Yeah.

God is an overly harsh God, isn't he !!!

The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

He [God] doesn't want us [his potential children] to have anything to do with murderers and oppressors and criminals.
(Deuteronomy 7:1-4 NLT)

Why is that ????????

Because he prefers for his own children [potential children] to be to be the murderers and oppressors and criminals.


Exodus 15:3
The LORD is a man of war...


Deuteronomy 32:41
If I whet my glittering sword, and mine hand take hold on judgment; I will render vengeance to mine enemies, and will reward them that hate me.
42  I will make mine arrows drunk with blood, and my sword shall devour flesh; and that with the blood of the slain and of the captives, from the beginning of revenges upon the enemy.
43  Rejoice, O ye nations, with his people: for he will avenge the blood of his servants, and will render vengeance to his adversaries, and will be merciful unto his land, and to his people.


Isaiah 42:13
The LORD shall go forth as a mighty man, he shall stir up jealousy like a man of war: he shall cry, yea, roar; he shall prevail against his enemies.



So how is your God any different to the Muslim God? (HINT: The correct answer is no different)

They are both Gods of War, advocating the destruction of those that oppose Them.



Your God is just the same as Allah, they both have a need to sake their bloodlust every now and then.



Raven,

Your argument is a nonsense.


Setting aside your scripture fluff piece. All you've shown is that your "God" is nothing more then an abusive parent you see on the news fronting Court

If you don't do what your "God" says he will put you in a pit filled with fire and smoke and torture and abuse and anguish and horror and you will spend eternity in this pit in pain and suffering, choking and crying until the end of time

But he LOVES you!!

It's nothing more then those parents sentenced to jail for locking their child in a closet for 10 years. "I only did it because I loved my child" Roll Eyes

Your "God" is a false God. Any "God" that uses fear in order to ensure obedience is a false "God". Any "God" that advocates child genital mutilation is a false "God" 

It is Raven's sincere hope you realise the evil of the child torture you so respect, and speak out against it as much as you do about Muslims.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 6th, 2014 at 5:18am by Raven »  

Quoth the Raven "Nevermore"

Raven would rather ask questions that may never be answered, then accept answers which must never be questioned.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21872
A cat with a view
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #50 - Oct 6th, 2014 at 8:41am
 
Raven wrote on Oct 6th, 2014 at 5:11am:

Setting aside your scripture fluff piece. All you've shown is that your "God" is nothing more then an abusive parent you see on the news fronting Court

If you don't do what your "God" says he will put you in a pit filled with fire and smoke and torture and abuse and anguish and horror and you will spend eternity in this pit in pain and suffering, choking and crying until the end of time

But he LOVES you!!



Yes, God is love.

And God loves us.

But if we persist in being 'naughty', God is going to kill us.       Cheesy

Why should you be shocked, at such a proposition ?        Smiley





Raven,

[Though many men deny it....] God is God, and we are not!

God is our creator !

Jeremiah 18:1
The word which came to Jeremiah from the LORD, saying,
2  Arise, and go down to the potter's house, and there I will cause thee to hear my words.
3  Then I went down to the potter's house, and, behold, he wrought a work on the wheels.
4  And the vessel that he made of clay was marred in the hand of the potter: so he made it again another vessel, as seemed good to the potter to make it.
5  Then the word of the LORD came to me, saying,
6  O house of Israel, cannot I do with you as this potter? saith the LORD. Behold, as the clay is in the potter's hand, so are ye in mine hand, O house of Israel.
7  At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy it;
8  If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them.
.....
.....
11  Now therefore go to, speak to the men of Judah, and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem, saying, Thus saith the LORD; Behold, I frame evil against you, and devise a device against you: return ye now every one from his evil way, and make your ways and your doings good.
12  And they said, There is no hope: but we will walk after our own devices, and we will every one do the imagination of his evil heart.







Quote:
It's nothing more then those parents sentenced to jail for locking their child in a closet for 10 years. "I only did it because I loved my child" Roll Eyes

Your "God" is a false God. Any "God" that uses fear in order to ensure obedience is a false "God". Any "God" that advocates child genital mutilation is a false "God" 

It is Raven's sincere hope you realise the evil of the child torture you so respect, and speak out against it as much as you do about Muslims.



We are all the potential children of God.

And God has put a spirit in us, to understand.

But instead of walking a path of understanding, we choose to spit in Gods face, at to shout;

"Get out of my way [father]! This is my life! I will do, exactly what I want to do here!!!!"



OK.

Do what pleases you.








2 Thessalonians 2:3
Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
4  
Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.



Who is
'the son of perdition'
?

Is it the 'anti-Christ' ????

Grin       Grin       Grin      


Who
, is the unpenitent person  - 'who exalts himself above all that is called God'?




Ezekiel 12:2
Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house.


Jeremiah 5:21
Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not:


Jeremiah 5:25
Your iniquities have turned away these things, and your sins have withholden good things from you.
26  For among my people are found wicked men: they lay wait, as he that setteth snares; they set a trap, they catch men.
27  As a cage is full of birds, so are their houses full of deceit: therefore they are become great, and waxen rich.
28  They are waxen fat, they shine: yea, they overpass the deeds of the wicked: they judge not the cause, the cause of the fatherless, yet they prosper; and the right of the needy do they not judge.
29  Shall I not visit for these things? saith the LORD: shall not my soul be avenged on such a nation as this?
30  A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land;
31  The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?







Cometh the harvest of the earth.

Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #51 - Oct 6th, 2014 at 10:26am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 5th, 2014 at 6:57pm:
bump

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21872
A cat with a view
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #52 - Oct 6th, 2014 at 10:42am
 
Soren wrote on Oct 6th, 2014 at 10:26am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 5th, 2014 at 6:57pm:
bump




Soren,

Those two women were demonstrating the fact that many Parisians are tolerant people - no more than that.



QUESTIONS;
#1,
Assuming firstly that those women were moslem, would those women dare to attend their mosque dressed like that ?

#2,
If moslem women attended their mosque [IN PARIS] dressed like that, how would moslem men at the mosque treat them, if they did ??????????
Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Annie Anthrax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #53 - Oct 6th, 2014 at 12:07pm
 
For Facebook users interested in learning about Australian Muslims, there's an excellent community page:

https://www.facebook.com/AustralianMuslimFaces?fref=ts

I'm not sure if you can still access it without a Facebook account, but it's definitely well worth a look.
Back to top
 

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #54 - Oct 6th, 2014 at 12:10pm
 
Increasingly this debate seems to be more about non-Muslims imposing on Muslim women their values and beliefs, rather than the claimed idea that they are actually freeing them from oppression.  All that is happening is the trade of one oppression for another.   The wishes of the Muslim women seemed to be ignored.  So much for the principles of choice and living in a pluralist society!   Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin
Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #55 - Oct 6th, 2014 at 12:31pm
 
Annie Anthrax wrote on Oct 6th, 2014 at 12:07pm:
For Facebook users interested in learning about Australian Muslims, there's an excellent community page:

https://www.facebook.com/AustralianMuslimFaces?fref=ts

I'm not sure if you can still access it without a Facebook account, but it's definitely well worth a look.


It sure is.

Quite a few fundamentalists there, but not all.

PS. Needless to say, wearing any kind of 'religious' garb is flagging oneself as a fundamentalist.

The Moderates are the ones who are perfectly happy to assimilate with the Australian mainstream without needing to parade themselves as belonging to an exclusive and insular community that rejects identification with the mainstream.

It hasn't been Muslim women without hijabs who have been abusing our soldiers in uniform.

Ostentatious religiosity and piety through the 'bill-boarding' of oneself as a 'Muslim' through wearing hijabs and the like is a declaration of fundamentalism trumping the fact of living in a secular society.

Own-goal again, Annie.  Smiley

What was the first thing you did when you wanted to rejoin the 'moderates'?

Threw away your hijab.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #56 - Oct 6th, 2014 at 12:46pm
 
|dev|null wrote on Oct 6th, 2014 at 12:10pm:
Increasingly this debate seems to be more about non-Muslims imposing on Muslim women their values and beliefs, rather than the claimed idea that they are actually freeing them from oppression.  All that is happening is the trade of one oppression for another.   The wishes of the Muslim women seemed to be ignored.  So much for the principles of choice and living in a pluralist society!   Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin



I am Muslim by birth and I find the burqa confronting. I even wish no women would wear it. Does that make me a bigot?...

..Why is the battle for Muslim women's rights being fought by non-Muslims? The defence of the burqa by Hardy, Paris and others is, more than likely, propelled by their desire not to malign Muslims. What they fail to consider is that criticism of the burqa is not necessarily an attack on Islam.Shortly after Abbott's comments, Ameer Ali, a vice-president of the Regional Islamic Da'wah Council of South-East Asia and the Pacific, advocated for a burqa ban, calling it ''the lingering relic of a patriarchal, misogynistic and tribal culture'' and saying it has no basis in the Koran. 

While many Muslims might disagree with Ali, his comments highlight that even within Islam the burqa is a contentious issue. It is precisely Muslims such as Ali who should be discussing it but Ali faces a backlash from the Muslim community because the burqa has become such an albatross around its neck that Muslims would prefer that no one mention it at all.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/society-and-culture/burqa-defenders-paradox-of-injustice-20100812-121bm.html#ixzz3FF37SVo7

This was written in 2010. Nothing has changed here. In Europe, France, Holland and Belgium have banned face covering. 

2009, France."The problem of the burka is not a religious problem, it's a problem of liberty and women's dignity. It's not a religious symbol, but a sign of subservience and debasement. I want to say solemnly, the burka is not welcome in France. In our country, we can't accept women prisoners behind a screen, cut off from all social life, deprived of all identity. That's not our idea of freedom."

There was raucous applause from MPs and senators. Sarkozy backed the setting up of a parliamentary commission on the issue of full Islamic veils, calling for all arguments to be heard. "But I tell you, we must not be ashamed of our values. We must not be afraid of defending them," he said.

Earlier in his speech, he warned against stigmatising religion in secular France. "We must not fight the wrong battle. In the republic, the Muslim religion must be respected as much as other religions."

Muslim headscarves and all religious symbols were banned in schools in 2004, and the latest row over religious dress is likely to spark more soul-searching and controversy in France.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #57 - Oct 6th, 2014 at 12:51pm
 
So, if we ban Niqab/Burqa Sensei, will that mean we should ban?

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Are they all "fundamentalists", Sensei?   Grin Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
wally1
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2055
Gender: male
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #58 - Oct 6th, 2014 at 12:55pm
 
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Women in Solidarity with Hijabs
Reply #59 - Oct 6th, 2014 at 12:57pm
 
I can see their faces, Stupid 3!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print