|dev|null wrote on Oct 17^th, 2014 at 11:15am:


It's sad, HB.  Christians claim to be morally superior to Muslims but as we see all too often here, it's a case of the pot telling the kettle it's bum is black.   

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 17^th, 2014 at 6:30pm:

It is not irrelevant, idiot, it is history.  Is history irrelevant?


I think you are stupid on purposes - you know your arguments are stupid, yet to put them forward with a sense of idiotic defiance.


There is no Christian terrorism. There is no Christian State being established through blood.
There is Islamic terrorism, there are Islamic terrorists murdering and establishing an Islamic State.

You can squirm all you like Brain, but Islam is present in the world as a murderous threat.



.

Brian Ross wrote Quote:


Of course it's published as a record of the covenant between Y.H.W.H. and the Hebrews.

There were no Christians on the earth 3414 years ago when the O.T covenant was established.

How would Christians know what Christ was actually replacing if there is not a copy of what is to be superseded?

Quote:


O.K. lets play your silly games

Romans 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

States that the **wrath of God is revealed against unrighteousness**

Romans 1:24-31 then give a list all iniquitous deeds unrighteous men will perform, pretty straight forward.

Romans 1:32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Again very straight foreward:

**The judgment of God** will be on Judgment day.

There are two verdicts on the day God judges men 1/.eternal spiritual life or  2/. eternal spiritual death.

The crucial difference between islam and Christianity is:

1/.islam unequivocally states that muslims must judge then torture and murder non muslims, on this earth.

2/. Christianity leaves the judging of men to the last day and the judgment of God

keep apologizing for islamic atrocities Brian, it suits you

Soren wrote on Oct 17^th, 2014 at 9:25pm:


History can never be irrelevant but as an historical document, it contains instructions which present day Christians all too often take to heart, Soren and act upon.   As much as you keep running from the facts, Christian Terrorists take heart from The Old Testament and have for thousands of years.  To them, it is God's instruction book.   

Quote:


I rather think the only one being stupid is yourself, Soren.  You keep tap dancing around, being an apologist for Christianity.   I am merely applying the same logic which you use to condemn Muslims.  If it's good enough for you,  why isn't it good enough for the rest of us?  Mmmm?   

Quote:


Christian Terrorism.  Documented and recognised as such by Governments, Soren.   

Quote:


Joseph Cony might disagree with you, Soren.   

Quote:


Which is being condemned by the majority of Muslims, Soren.   

Quote:


I don't doubt some interpretations of that religion are but they are not and cannot be considered mainstream.  They are extremist fringe elements.  No matter how you try and paint them as mainstream, intelligent observers know you're bullshitting, Soren.   

Bubba Zanetti wrote on Oct 18^th, 2014 at 1:37pm:


Perhaps because I never apologise for Islam or Muhammad?   

I wrote 'apologise' for Islam. I wrote 'defend' for Muhammad. The sovereign of Islam never seems to appear in any of your dissertations. Why is that?

The Australian Federation of Islamic Councils - mainstream enough for you, Brain? - wants sharia law in Australia. In my view anyone who wants sharia law in a Western liberal democracy like Australia is not a moderate Muslims.

moses wrote on Oct 18^th, 2014 at 2:08pm:


I don't have to, Moses. You have to prove that it does.   I will be following the example you have set with Islam.   Off you go, now.