Soren wrote on Oct 7
th, 2014 at 12:52pm:
Karnal wrote on Oct 6
th, 2014 at 9:42pm:
And yet, you’ve just avoided the question. Again.
How are calls for carpet-bombing the tinted races any different to calls for terrorist attacks?
Idiotic or not, I’m still curious. What makes your calls to violence, death and destruction superior to any others?
You cravenly, mendaciously and yes, lyingly misrepesent me.
We were talking about war and response to enemies. I used the example of Germany (not tinted) and Japan (slightly tinted).
I said we should not get into any war unless we are prepared to kill the enemy until it knows it is beaten.
There is no point of going to war in order to spare the enemy. If we beat them and they have an election and choose a government that continues to be our enemy, then they are clearly not thinking that they are beaten and so a war will again ensue and the killing can be resumed IF we want to beat them. .
Carpetbombing means killing the enemy until it taps the mat.This is what happed with Germany and Japan and Serbia and now they are playing nice.
It did not happen with Iraq, Iran, Labia, Syria.
Sorry, old chap, are you saying we
shouldn’t carpetbomb Iraq, Iran, Labia and Syria?
That’s news to me.
Admirable restraint, old chap. I agree.
Carpetbombing should have an objective of some kind - preferably military. It’s not just something to - what was the word you used?
Satisfaction. Yes, it’s not a tool to satisfy our old boy instincts.
Good to see we’re on the same page, old chap. Thanks for the clarification.
You
don’t want to carpetbomb the Muselman.Jolly good.
Now, onto the tinted races - would you like to retract your statements on them as well?