Clive's inquiry to gather much we already know was due for a funding package at the end of September, however no record of that happening can be found.

Senators may have realised they need to produce value for money, especially when its the voter doing the paying.

Such volume of deep questions should not be rushed for answers, and time is quickly running out for the report to be written.

Senators are still opposing the budget and for them to throw in extra expenses to gather information of no benefit to the voter shall be remembered by the voters

Senators appear to have chosen not to decide how much voter money to provide the Clive inquiry, and so preventing its waste of money!

cods wrote on Oct 9^th, 2014 at 9:14am:



Funny you say that! The judicial processes have quietly been taking place so Clive can appear in a criminal Court and explain his duping of the AEC.

Clive's threat of the High Court to bring the AEC round to Clive's understanding of the Electoral ACT 1918, and its shall's not apply to his Party, especially the shall of the ACT that Clive name the Party Secretary so the AEC can confirm they be enrolled to vote.

Clive's threats and duping activity further raises questions of what payments did Clive make and to whom for the AEC to find it had enrolled to vote a person named the Office of Chief Financial Officer!

Clive's need to do anything to save his business interests did not cross his mind that records be kept!

double post 

Yes - perhaps some have actually begun to realise that costly commissions of inquiry and audit and such that serve to hand lovely little earners to old mates and such are very much on the nose.

It's now time to move on to chopping off some of the other lovely little earners going around.

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Oct 9^th, 2014 at 11:01am:

A month is too short. People are on the dole an average of about two years due to widespread and unwarranted discrimination among employers who prefer to rort 457 visas rather than offer opportunities to our unemployed. Maybe two years would make a more fitting character-building exercise?

I would say a good proportion are not concerned about Palmer because he's sticking it up the Liberals...

Redmond Neck wrote on Oct 9^th, 2014 at 10:41am:


The LNP has gone cold on the inquiry to have the voter pay to save Clive's business interests, so instead Clive was able to muster an inquiry to get evidence so QLNP could be sued by Clive and Qlder's pay the bill.

PUPS have a bigger problem, the Party is doomed for deregistration. The ACT requires the Party Secretary be an enrolled voter. AEC has nobody enrolled to vote under the name of, Office of Chief Financial Officer. All AEC enrolment requires a name.

PUPS having monetary sold their vote to PUP and it enforced by the Party owner, becomes just a person, no party owner.

So end the employment of a person owned by Clive Palmer!

Once pup senators are now independent's having sold their vote to an individual, which is a criminal offence!

Bam wrote on Oct 9^th, 2014 at 8:12pm:



and if labor were to win the next election Palmer would be sticking it up Labor.  But the real truth is that he is sticking it up EVERYONE and everything not to his personal benefit.

I look forward to him being charged with embezzlement.