Brian Ross wrote on Oct 14
th, 2014 at 10:55pm:
You didn't read the reference very closely, did you, Adamant?
I Did read it brian ,it is obvious to me that you did not. You forgot to mention the 10,000 Hindus that were killed, then again you are a raging racist islamophobe (one who is too scared to show islam for what it truly is) in case you loose your head.
Your continued racist rants against everything that is not islam, makes you one of the most disgusting individuals I have ever had the misfortune to come across.
"Hindus have always been threatened and discriminated against in Pakistan and Bangladesh on religious grounds. Though in 1947, Hindus accounted for 24 per cent of the present day Pakistan’s population, now the numbers less than two per cent. Situation is equally grave in Bangladesh where Hindus numbered 31 per cent in 1947, but now number nine per cent. Most of the Hindus / Sikhs have either been driven out, or have been killed or forcibly converted in Pakistan and Bangladesh. However, in India, the present percentage of Muslim population is much higher than that was in 1947".
"Hindus suffered such attempted extermination in East Bengal in 1971, when the Pakistani Army killed 1 to 3 million people, with Hindus as their most wanted target. This fact is strictly ignored in most writing about Hindu-Muslim relations, in spite (or rather because) of its serious implication that even the lowest estimate of the Hindu death toll in 1971 makes Hindus by far the most numerous victims of Hindu-Muslim violence in the post-colonial period. It is significant that no serious count or religion-wise breakdown of the death toll has been attempted: the Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi ruling classes all agree that this would feed Hindu grievances against Muslims".
Run along you racist bigot.