Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year (Read 2084 times)
imcrookonit
Ex Member
*



Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Oct 13th, 2014 at 6:02am
 
Pain of high energy bills shows in Ernst and Young report

Date
    October 12, 2014


One in three Australian households have missed an electricity bill payment in the past year and one in 10 have skipped three or more, largely because they could not afford to pay, new research shows.      Sad

As soaring energy prices squeeze family budgets, consultancy firm Ernst and Young found among those who missed a bill, 60 per cent could not afford to pay, 32 per cent had forgotten to pay, and 7 per cent had disputed it.

However, the alarming figures released on Monday are part of a report pitched at energy retailers seeking to expand their customer base and boost on-time payments, as families increasingly struggle with higher bills.


It said customers were more likely to pay on time if they were offered discounts, text reminders, the ability to select billing dates, and mobile phone apps.

But Oliver Derum, senior policy officer of energy and water at the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, said energy retailers should first focus on rebuilding customer trust by pricing their services fairly and correctly.

"Very worrying numbers of people are making terrible sacrifices to pay their bills," Mr Derum said.      Sad

"They buy food that's not healthy, they have two meals a day, they retreat into social isolation and don't invite people over because they can't afford to heat the living room," he said.

For an essential service, "customer relations was severely deteriorating", he said. "People feel like they don't have a choice about consuming electricity and yet they're buying it from these companies who don't understand the situation that they're in."

Complaints against providers to the NSW Energy and Water Ombudsman hit a record high in the past financial year, in line with a series of big price hikes related to overspending on poles and wires in the past half decade.   Sad      

Customer service-related complaints surged 21 per cent on the previous year, with the bulk relating to poor treatment and a company's failure to respond.

Mr Derum also said customers were frustrated that retailers could raise prices during contracts at will. Last month, the Australian Energy Market Commission rejected a proposal to stop retailers from varying prices during contracts.

The Ernst and Young report also found 55 per cent of customers had switched energy providers or considered it in the past year. Among those who considered changing, a quarter was prompted by bill shock.

But 20 per cent of potential switchers decided to stick with their provider because the process of finding another was too daunting, up from 15 per cent last year.

NSW Energy and Water Ombudsman Clare Petre said, while the deregulation of energy pricing in July meant customers could start saving hundreds of dollars a year, the market was "too confusing and intimidating" for most to participate in.

"That's a real issue. The regulators and the government need to address that," she said.

The Ernst and Young report also found 90 per cent of Australians have, or would consider, including solar in their home energy mix. Among those using solar, 70 per cent said they added it to save money.

"Energy affordability is a big issue for many people so they are looking at alternatives including more self-sufficiency," Ernst and Young managing partner Stuart Hartley said.

"Given the advances being made in solar and battery technology, uptake could increase further, impacting demand and adding to the pressure on traditional retailers".

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/pain-of-high-energy-bills-shows-in-ernst-and-young-report-20141012-1142j6.html#ixzz3FxjCsJFn
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26270
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #1 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 6:04am
 
They're talking about the past year, NOT since the carbon tax was abolished.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14213
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #2 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 8:23am
 
Tony Abbott
was maliciously misquoted by the
socialist Murdoch Press
on the savings to come with the carbon permits abolition

What he REALLY said was "my neighbours around my home of
32 Lady Davidson Circuit, Forestville, NSW.
who were  doing the
heavy lifting
for the
leaners
on
Gillard's carbon tax
- who saw their electricity bills for heated swimming pools, air-con - and central heating
soar to over $6000.00 a year
"

"With
Gillard's carbon tax
gone - my average neighbours will be
$550.00 a year better off
"

"It's been a struggle for
me and ALL my neighbours"




...

...

...






Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #3 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 8:44am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Oct 13th, 2014 at 6:04am:
They're talking about the past year, NOT since the carbon tax was abolished.


Are you saying household power bill totals will be less than now, or more.

The experts are saying more.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
buzzanddidj
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 14213
Eganstown, via Daylesford, VIC
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #4 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 10:15am
 
____ wrote on Oct 13th, 2014 at 8:44am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Oct 13th, 2014 at 6:04am:
They're talking about the past year, NOT since the carbon tax was abolished.


Are you saying household power bill totals will be less than now, or more.

The experts are saying more.





If
Abbott
had used a bit more
honesty
and a lot less
election spin
he would have rightly claimed that
electricity prices would fall by around $150 per annum*
on the
annual average of $1500 bills


Not
$550*



http://talkingelectricity.com.au/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Topic-1_Bill-Brea...


Then, again, what does
Tony Abbott
know of
"honesty"
?




Back to top
 

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians.
Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.'


- Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85186
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #5 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 11:10am
 
$18 on the last bill which runs around $450 a bill at the farm... that comes to $72 a year if you're lucky.

The never-ending rises in costs of electricity will always eat up any single cent you get back on it...so, as I said, all that Hydra-headed structure of fat 'ceo's and 'board members will always have their hands out for revenue  out of your pocket.

It is way past time - as I told Mr Baird in response to his 'survey', for the whole 'privatisation' rort - which is just another AWH but legimitised by the government, to cease and the utilities to be returned to single ownership.

Mr Baird - this nonsense of 'private industry can do it more efficiently' started with a predecessor of yours, your party - and it was daylight robbery of the people of NSW to fill his pockets with a nice little earner that just happened to come his way from sell-off of an already owned public utility when he was Premier.

Corruption at the highest level.

Call it what you want, Sir - it is robbery, and I challenge you to have the balls to stop it and reverse it NOW, and take back the profits from that failed venture.

Are you with us - or against us, Mr Baird?
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #6 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 4:13pm
 
Privatised companies do NOT do it more efficiently. That's just a myth. If there's any efficiency, it's pocketed by the unelected companies to give to their shareholders, not given back to the customers in bill reductions.

Privatisation for profit is a crock.
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #7 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 6:54pm
 
Haven't seen my cheque yet, Mr Abbott......

Angry
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
Lobo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7407
Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #8 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 6:57pm
 
Bam wrote on Oct 13th, 2014 at 4:13pm:
Privatised companies do NOT do it more efficiently. That's just a myth. If there's any efficiency, it's pocketed by the unelected companies to give to their shareholders, not given back to the customers in bill reductions.

Privatisation for profit is a crock.


Privatisation, is a crock!!!

Wink
Back to top
 

"What's in store for me in the direction I don't take?"-Jack Kerouac.
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85186
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #9 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 10:57pm
 
Lobo wrote on Oct 13th, 2014 at 6:57pm:
Bam wrote on Oct 13th, 2014 at 4:13pm:
Privatised companies do NOT do it more efficiently. That's just a myth. If there's any efficiency, it's pocketed by the unelected companies to give to their shareholders, not given back to the customers in bill reductions.

Privatisation for profit is a crock.


Privatisation, is a crock!!!

Wink



Indeed, and only the people who gain from it are saying it isn't....long overdue for the scrapheap of political history.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #10 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 11:21pm
 
Lobo wrote on Oct 13th, 2014 at 6:57pm:
Bam wrote on Oct 13th, 2014 at 4:13pm:
Privatised companies do NOT do it more efficiently. That's just a myth. If there's any efficiency, it's pocketed by the unelected companies to give to their shareholders, not given back to the customers in bill reductions.

Privatisation for profit is a crock.


Privatisation, is a crock!!!

Wink

Fair enough.

I have said earlier that there's nothing inherently wrong with not-for-profit privatisation, where the asset is privatised but the owners are not allowed to make a profit. Not likely to happen though...
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #11 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 11:51pm
 
Privatised companies running at no profit are about as useful as the proverbial chocolate teapot.

The point of privatisation is that they gain investment from the markets and from investors, subject to them running the business efficiently and turning a profit.

Privatised companies are so much better run than nationalised ones because of the need to keep a control on costs.
They need to be efficient, they need to be streamlined, they need a rationalised headcount structure and they need tyo eradicate waste.

Nationalized ones do little of this. Its not their money they are playing with - there is to some extent a bottomless pit of funding from the public sector and they end up with too many people, poor processes and a poor mindset not driven by the bottom line and looking after company dollars.

I'm spending this afternoon actually working in a tiny office space just off the M40, because there is an OpEx freeze in place, we need to keep costs down and there is no justification for a lavish hotel room to work etc.
That mindset is prevalent in the private industry, it is not in the public sector.

They would spend money, charge it back and not care less for the bigger picture.

My lecturer once said "And after all that, if you still can't get a job you can work in the public sector because they'll take anyone"
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #12 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 11:55pm
 
Give us some good examples of Australian privatisation following that pattern Andrei
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85186
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #13 - Oct 13th, 2014 at 11:57pm
 
"The point of privatisation is that they gain investment from the markets and from investors, subject to them running the business efficiently and turning a profit."

That's the whole - if their idea of 'efficiency' is higher costs to the end user - as the 'global economy' which also adds lower wages and standards of living to the mix - then - as clearly stated - those who benefit from privatisation are the only ones who support the idea.

In this case it is ONLY the companies themselves and a few governments who see a pot of gold in selling off the farm - nobody else.

The rest have woken to the reality by now, which is that privatisation is another word for choking the goose that lays the golden egg with over supply of costly clerks n jerks and 'ceos' and such.

When a single event of privatisation shows me efficiency in lower costs - I'm ready to listen.  Now let me hear from you how higher costs means efficiency in a service industry  (LMAO)....

So Show Me!!
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: Electricity - Are They Better Off $550 A Year
Reply #14 - Oct 14th, 2014 at 12:05am
 
British Airways is a classic case of a company that benefited from moving from the public to the private sector.
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print