Australian Politics Forum

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75114
Gender: male

Re: Swear filter
Reply #60 - Nov 13^th, 2014 at 2:15pm

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 13^th, 2014 at 2:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 13^th, 2014 at 10:25am:

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 13^th, 2014 at 10:22am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 9:03pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 5:07pm:

Anyone who doesn't like having their swear words, particularly those F & C words, converted into something less aggressive, then I suggest there is an easy remedy.

Don't use them!

There are also those using this & other forums who don't like it &/or who "shouldn't" be exposed to that sort of language, irrespective of what you may think!

So, just don't use the swear words!

what a load of croc ... if I wanted to do that it wouldn't be an issue.

I think to many people live sheltered lives ... they should try to get out in the real world every now and then.

Well, as I have said previously, everything has limits & there are both "Human & Natural Laws", that ensure those limits!

you can try justify it to yourself anyway you like ...

Justify? I don't need to justify anything, the statement is factually correct!

Everything does have limits & there are both "Human & Natural Laws", that ensure those limits!

Cheers!

I didn't say the statement was incorrect ... I said you can try and justify, what in my view amounts to prudish censorship, with whatever excuse you like ... in the end it's still prudish censorship.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

perceptions_now

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth WA
Gender: male

Re: Swear filter
Reply #61 - Nov 13^th, 2014 at 7:02pm

John Smith wrote on Nov 13^th, 2014 at 2:15pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 13^th, 2014 at 2:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 13^th, 2014 at 10:25am:

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 13^th, 2014 at 10:22am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 9:03pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 5:07pm:

Anyone who doesn't like having their swear words, particularly those F & C words, converted into something less aggressive, then I suggest there is an easy remedy.

Don't use them!

There are also those using this & other forums who don't like it &/or who "shouldn't" be exposed to that sort of language, irrespective of what you may think!

So, just don't use the swear words!

what a load of croc ... if I wanted to do that it wouldn't be an issue.

I think to many people live sheltered lives ... they should try to get out in the real world every now and then.

Well, as I have said previously, everything has limits & there are both "Human & Natural Laws", that ensure those limits!

you can try justify it to yourself anyway you like ...

Justify? I don't need to justify anything, the statement is factually correct!

Everything does have limits & there are both "Human & Natural Laws", that ensure those limits!

Cheers!

I didn't say the statement was incorrect ... I said you can try and justify, what in my view amounts to prudish censorship, with whatever excuse you like ... in the end it's still prudish censorship.

Well John, if the statement is correct, then nothing else need be said, no "justification is required!

And, the statement is correct, "everything does have limits & there are both "Human & Natural Laws", that ensure those limits"!

That's why there are Human Laws, which for example restrict what can be "seen & heard" on Television & Radio & restriction what we can "say & do, by way of Defamation Laws & Laws of Nature which say we can not endlessly pump Oil out of the ground, nor endlessly grow the Global Population.

Yes, as I have said, everything has limits and so to what can and can not be said &/or done, on forums such as these, no matter if you or others may think to the contrary.

That does not mean there will not be disagreement on the level of those limits, clearly there often is.

Some may think Moderation goes too far on somethings, whilst others will say it doesn't go far enough, But that's life.

Cheers!

Back to top

IP Logged

mantra

Gold Member

Offline

ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female

Re: Swear filter
Reply #62 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 5:08am

Quote:

I didn't say the statement was incorrect ... I said you can try and justify, what in my view amounts to prudish censorship, with whatever excuse you like ... in the end it's still prudish censorship.

Fortunately you and a few others who love swearing and want it splattered all over this board are a minority. If the owner/administrator doesn't use profanities here, then out of respect for him and this forum, why wouldn't you make an effort to follow the rules?

If you think this is prudish censorship, you need to find other forums where swearing is acceptable. Try PA where there is only light moderation rather than trying to change the rules of Ozpolitic to suit a minority.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 106604
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Swear filter
Reply #63 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 6:27am

mantra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 5:08am:

Quote:

I didn't say the statement was incorrect ... I said you can try and justify, what in my view amounts to prudish censorship, with whatever excuse you like ... in the end it's still prudish censorship.

Fortunately you and a few others who love swearing and want it splattered all over this board are a minority. If the owner/administrator doesn't use profanities here, then out of respect for him and this forum, why wouldn't you make an effort to follow the rules?

If you think this is prudish censorship, you need to find other forums where swearing is acceptable. Try PA where there is only light moderation rather than trying to change the rules of Ozpolitic to suit a minority.

But you should be able to write Kung F u without a gap.

Kung dam you

Back to top

IP Logged

Neferti

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female

Re: Swear filter
Reply #64 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 6:45am

Bobby. wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 6:27am:

mantra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 5:08am:

Quote:

I didn't say the statement was incorrect ... I said you can try and justify, what in my view amounts to prudish censorship, with whatever excuse you like ... in the end it's still prudish censorship.

Fortunately you and a few others who love swearing and want it splattered all over this board are a minority. If the owner/administrator doesn't use profanities here, then out of respect for him and this forum, why wouldn't you make an effort to follow the rules?

If you think this is prudish censorship, you need to find other forums where swearing is acceptable. Try PA where there is only light moderation rather than trying to change the rules of Ozpolitic to suit a minority.

But you should be able to write Kung F u without a gap.

Kung dam you

Actually, it should be DAMN you. A dam is a barrier that impounds water or underground streams.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 106604
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Swear filter
Reply #65 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 6:54am

Neferti wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 6:45am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 6:27am:

mantra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 5:08am:

Quote:

I didn't say the statement was incorrect ... I said you can try and justify, what in my view amounts to prudish censorship, with whatever excuse you like ... in the end it's still prudish censorship.

Fortunately you and a few others who love swearing and want it splattered all over this board are a minority. If the owner/administrator doesn't use profanities here, then out of respect for him and this forum, why wouldn't you make an effort to follow the rules?

If you think this is prudish censorship, you need to find other forums where swearing is acceptable. Try PA where there is only light moderation rather than trying to change the rules of Ozpolitic to suit a minority.

But you should be able to write Kung F u without a gap.

Kung dam you

Actually, it should be DAMN you. A dam is a barrier that impounds water or underground streams.

Yes - it's an unintended consequence of political correctness.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75114
Gender: male

Re: Swear filter
Reply #66 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 8:36am

mantra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 5:08am:

Quote:

I didn't say the statement was incorrect ... I said you can try and justify, what in my view amounts to prudish censorship, with whatever excuse you like ... in the end it's still prudish censorship.

Fortunately you and a few others who love swearing and want it splattered all over this board are a minority. If the owner/administrator doesn't use profanities here, then out of respect for him and this forum, why wouldn't you make an effort to follow the rules?

If you think this is prudish censorship, you need to find other forums where swearing is acceptable. Try PA where there is only light moderation rather than trying to change the rules of Ozpolitic to suit a minority.

Because this isn't the owners home, the owner has set up a public forum, open to all members of the public, to have their say.

So you think people should only comment on a 'swear filter' thread if they agree with you? Maybe you should go to PA or start your own forum? That way you can run it according to how you like and only allow those who agree with you to post ?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

mantra

Gold Member

Offline

ozpolitic.com

Posts: 10750
Gender: female

Re: Swear filter
Reply #67 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 11:17am

John Smith wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 8:36am:

Because this isn't the owners home, the owner has set up a public forum, open to all members of the public, to have their say.

So you think people should only comment on a 'swear filter' thread if they agree with you? Maybe you should go to PA or start your own forum? That way you can run it according to how you like and only allow those who agree with you to post ?

I can give an opinion as you so freely give yours. No need to be defensive.

If the administration wanted swearing - there wouldn't be a swear filter or any moderation of it.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 139247
Gender: male

Re: Swear filter
Reply #68 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 11:28am

Neferti wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 6:45am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 6:27am:

mantra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 5:08am:

Quote:

I didn't say the statement was incorrect ... I said you can try and justify, what in my view amounts to prudish censorship, with whatever excuse you like ... in the end it's still prudish censorship.

Fortunately you and a few others who love swearing and want it splattered all over this board are a minority. If the owner/administrator doesn't use profanities here, then out of respect for him and this forum, why wouldn't you make an effort to follow the rules?

If you think this is prudish censorship, you need to find other forums where swearing is acceptable. Try PA where there is only light moderation rather than trying to change the rules of Ozpolitic to suit a minority.

But you should be able to write Kung F u without a gap.

Kung dam you

Actually, it should be DAMN you. A dam is a barrier that impounds water or underground streams.

What's a dyke?

Back to top

IP Logged

Life_goes_on

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male

Re: Swear filter
Reply #69 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 11:31am

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 11:28am:

Neferti wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 6:45am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 6:27am:

mantra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 5:08am:

Quote:

I didn't say the statement was incorrect ... I said you can try and justify, what in my view amounts to prudish censorship, with whatever excuse you like ... in the end it's still prudish censorship.

Fortunately you and a few others who love swearing and want it splattered all over this board are a minority. If the owner/administrator doesn't use profanities here, then out of respect for him and this forum, why wouldn't you make an effort to follow the rules?

If you think this is prudish censorship, you need to find other forums where swearing is acceptable. Try PA where there is only light moderation rather than trying to change the rules of Ozpolitic to suit a minority.

But you should be able to write Kung F u without a gap.

Kung dam you

Actually, it should be DAMN you. A dam is a barrier that impounds water or underground streams.

What's a dyke?

Not quite certain, but I think a dam keeps water in and a dyke keeps water out.

Back to top

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.

IP Logged

Redmond Neck Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 21693 ACT Gender:	Re: Swear filter Reply #70 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 11:33am greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 11:28am: What's a dyke? Senator Wong !
Back to top	BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS. ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS! IP Logged

skippy. Gold Member Offline Posts: 20882 Gender:	Re: Swear filter Reply #71 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 12:45pm Redmond Neck wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 11:33am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 11:28am: What's a dyke? Senator Wong ! I hope she doesn't dehydrate.
Back to top	freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL Click onWWW below IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: Swear filter
Reply #72 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 12:46pm

mantra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 5:08am:

Quote:

I didn't say the statement was incorrect ... I said you can try and justify, what in my view amounts to prudish censorship, with whatever excuse you like ... in the end it's still prudish censorship.

Fortunately you and a few others who love swearing and want it splattered all over this board are a minority. If the owner/administrator doesn't use profanities here, then out of respect for him and this forum, why wouldn't you make an effort to follow the rules?

If you think this is prudish censorship, you need to find other forums where swearing is acceptable. Try PA where there is only light moderation rather than trying to change the rules of Ozpolitic to suit a minority.

http://ozpolitic.com/polanimal/

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75114
Gender: male

Re: Swear filter
Reply #73 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 1:20pm

mantra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 11:17am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 8:36am:

Because this isn't the owners home, the owner has set up a public forum, open to all members of the public, to have their say.

So you think people should only comment on a 'swear filter' thread if they agree with you? Maybe you should go to PA or start your own forum? That way you can run it according to how you like and only allow those who agree with you to post ?

I can give an opinion as you so freely give yours. No need to be defensive.

If the administration wanted swearing - there wouldn't be a swear filter or any moderation of it.

your wasn't an opinion, it was a shot at me

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Annie Anthrax

Gold Member

Offline

Take the plan, spin it
sideways

Posts: 7057
Gender: female

Re: Swear filter
Reply #74 - Nov 14^th, 2014 at 3:49pm

mantra wrote on Nov 14^th, 2014 at 5:08am:

Quote:

I didn't say the statement was incorrect ... I said you can try and justify, what in my view amounts to prudish censorship, with whatever excuse you like ... in the end it's still prudish censorship.

Fortunately you and a few others who love swearing and want it splattered all over this board are a minority. If the owner/administrator doesn't use profanities here, then out of respect for him and this forum, why wouldn't you make an effort to follow the rules?

If you think this is prudish censorship, you need to find other forums where swearing is acceptable. Try PA where there is only light moderation rather than trying to change the rules of Ozpolitic to suit a minority.

How did John try and change the rules? Is there some kind of campaign? A petition perhaps?

People are allowed to voice their dislike of what happens here. Pretty much all of your posts are in that vein.

Now for something completely different, please come back at me with some more biased moderation crap.

Back to top

I can't do this, but I'm doing it anyway.

IP Logged