freediver wrote on Dec 2
nd, 2014 at 8:45am:
Like I just finished explaining Gandalf, that is how I interpreted your stupid rhetorical question. It is not a false argument, it is simply how our economy works
How our economy works:
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 1
st, 2014 at 1:50pm:
The question is whether the increase in production costs (such as purchasing halal certification) are a) always automatically passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices as you insist or b) could be absorbed by the producers in anticipation for higher profits as a result of accessing a previously unavailable market that certification enables. This is in fact that an eminently sensible and logical position that you must reject if you are going to remain consistent with your ill-thought out original position - even while you directly contradict yourself by conceding that scenario b is a perfectly reasonable possibility.
And here is the statement that FD is falling over himself to try and abandon:
freediver wrote on Nov 25
th, 2014 at 9:38pm:
Profit margins will only be decreased if a benefit in total profits as a result is anticipated. Those total profits will inevitably take into account all costs incurred. Costs also will only be incurred if there is a net benefit.
FD, in view of the above statement, in regards to the domestic chicken market, would you care to revise your previous claim that:
freediver wrote on Nov 23
rd, 2014 at 3:18pm:
Even if you buy the non-halal product, the price will be influenced (increased) by this extortion.
?
Given that you don't have a damn clue how much Baida pays for certification, and in view of your (sensible) statement about the possibility that profit margins
could be decreased "if a benefit in total profits as a result is anticipated", and that Baida entering a previously unavailable market may well represent such an anticipated benefit - will you now concede that your insistence that halal certification costs will always, absolutely, never-ever, have the effect of increasing the price of chicken for the consumer - is nothing but baseless and prejudiced crap?