John Smith wrote on Nov 22
nd, 2014 at 9:40pm:
What does how many posts a day I post have to do anything? I work from home and my pc is on 15 hrs a day ... I'm in and out of my office and I usually check in on ozpol when I step in ... what do you think that proves?
I haven't singled out poor old Herb, he started this thread ... did he think everyone was going to sing kumbaya and hold his hand?
By the way, the topic at hand is trolls, which is what I am discussing ... anything else?
Oh! Is that what you were doing - discussion?
I may have to go back and re-read your input in this thread, just in case I've missed something that would qualify as genuine discussion or debate. Perhaps I should ask any 'disinterested' parties on this thread about how they value your 'discussion' technique?
Your earlier comments and sneers about Bobby and his supposed sexuality is acceptable, is it? Or is this some private game some of us are not privy to? Your dismissal of Swagman as a drinker is another form of 'discussion, is it?
Your playground response of, " It wasn't me, it was him" cuts no ice with me. The same goes for the excuse for the brevity of your posts.
Actually, after reading back through the thread, I suppose I should consider myself fortunate. Your reply to me would appear to be the longest contribution you've made so far. If that is indeed so, you do me an honour, sir.
Now that we have established the parameters of discussion as it specifically applies to yourself, perhaps we could return to the subject of the OP. This applies to your, "BTW, the topic at hand is trolls - anything else?"
Yes, there is, actually. A question of my own.
Given myriad definitions, how is it that you have never considered your own behaviour (you know what I'm referring to) as being close to that of a troll?
Take your time.
If it all gets too hard, you can always apply a label to
me and then complain about my treatment of you to an appreciative audience.
Careful, though, I might bite.