Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print
Combating Islamic Radicalism (Read 5722 times)
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42268
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #105 - Dec 8th, 2014 at 10:45pm
 
moses wrote on Dec 7th, 2014 at 3:34pm:
Brian Ross wrote: Quote:
No.  Are you claiming that Christians don't refer to The Old Testament at all and have totally abandoned it's teachings?

&

Why are you afraid to even admit that they do preach from any parts of The Old Testament, Moses?

&

Even more alarming is your obvious unwillingness to admit that some Christians follow the teachings of The Old Testament and use it to justify their actions.

&

You seem to want to disown completely The Old Testament.  You keep claiming that it has been superseded.  Yet, in this post, for the first time you're admitting that Christians do draw upon it for preaching.   Funny how it's taken this long to get that admission out of you, Moses.


Dishonest knavery becomes you Brian.

Mosaic Law was discarded 2014 years ago by Christ.

You are unable to understand the difference between the 3,414 year old Mosaic Law (which was superseded by Christ) and other parts of the O.T. which are relevant to Christians?


No, I am not.  My point has always been that many Christians refer to The Old Testament and all to often forgotten what you claim about it being superseded, themselves, Moses.

You appear unable to accept that many Christians still practice Old Testament Christianity, Moses.  Why?   We have the example of Yadda, who frequently refers to The Old Testament to justify his viewpoint yet you are silent on it.  Why?

Do I detect hypocrisy on your part?   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42268
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #106 - Dec 8th, 2014 at 10:57pm
 
moses wrote on Dec 8th, 2014 at 7:43pm:
Karnal wrote: Quote:
That’s strange, because I’ve heard plenty of Muslim leaders come out to say ISIS are not following the teachings of Muhammed.


They say?

Well here's your big chance, go and ask them for an explanation that clearly shows how the fundamentalists have got it wrong.



He doesn't have to ask them, Moses.  They already have:

Quote:
World's top Muslim leaders condemn attacks on Iraqi Christians

Two of the leading voices in the Muslim world denounced the persecution of Christians in Iraq, at the hands of extremists proclaiming a caliphate under the name Islamic State.

The most explicit condemnation came from Iyad Ameen Madani, the Secretary General for the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the group representing 57 countries, and 1.4 billion Muslims.

In a statement, he officially denounced the "forced deportation under the threat of execution” of Christians, calling it a "crime that cannot be tolerated.” The Secretary General also distanced Islam from the actions of the militant group known as ISIS, saying they "have nothing to do with Islam and its principles that call for justice, kindness, fairness, freedom of faith and coexistence.”

Meanwhile, Turkey's top cleric, the spiritual successor to the caliphate under the Ottoman Empire, also touched on the topic during a peace conference of Islamic scholars.

In a not-so-veiled swipe at ISIS, Mehmet Gormez declared that "an entity that lacks legal justification has no authority to declare war against a political gathering, any country or community.” He went on to say that Muslims should not be hostile towards "people with different views, values and beliefs, and regard them as enemies.”

Their remarks come at a time when Christian leaders in Iraq have called on Muslim leaders worldwide to denounce the anti-Christian violence in the country. In the past decade, the majority of Iraqi Christians have either fled the country or taken refuge in the autonomous region of Kurdistan.

The declaration of a "caliphate" by Islamist militants in Iraq lacks legitimacy and their death threats to Christians are a danger to civilization, Turkey's top cleric, the successor to the last caliph's most senior imam, said.

Islamic State, an armed group formerly allied to al Qaeda that has captured swathes of territory across Iraq, last month declared its leader, Ibrahim al-Baghdadi, "caliph" - the historical title last held by the Turkish Ottoman sultan who ruled much of the Muslim world.

"Such declarations have no legitimacy whatsoever," Mehmet Gormez, head of the Religious Affairs Directorate, the highest religious authority in Turkey, which, although a majority Muslim country, has been a secular state since the 1920s.

"Since the caliphate was abolished ... there have been movements that think they can pull together the Muslim world by re-establishing a caliphate, but they have nothing to do with reality, whether from a political or legal perspective."

Gormez said death threats against non-Muslims made by the group, formerly known as Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), were hugely damaging. "The statement made against Christians is truly awful. Islamic scholars need to focus on this (because) an inability to peacefully sustain other faiths and cultures heralds the collapse of a civilization," he told Reuters in an interview.

[Source]

Egypt’s highest religious authority – Al-Azhar’s Grand Mufti Shawqi Allam -  denounced the Islamic State as a threat to Islam and said that the group violates Islamic law

Saudi Arabia's highest religious authority, Grand Mufti, Abdulaziz al-Sheikh, said on Tuesday that terrorism, which he accuses the groups of committing on a systematic scale, had no place in Islam's ideology.

So, you don't think they're condemning it on theological grounds, Moses?   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #107 - Dec 8th, 2014 at 11:29pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 8th, 2014 at 10:57pm:
So, you don't think they're condemning it on theological grounds, Moses?


There are two completely air tight rebuttals to this point Brian:

1. they are stupid
2. they are mendacious (google: taqqiya)

Now you'll get all sorts of inane arguments as to why its one or the other, but ultimately it will come down to this basic argument: "oh come on, I've read the Quranic translation, I'm sure thats what it means - and here I'll throw in a quote from jihad-watch, plus a quote from some nutjob muslim leader that no one listens to to prove it".
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42268
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #108 - Dec 8th, 2014 at 11:44pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8th, 2014 at 11:29pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 8th, 2014 at 10:57pm:
So, you don't think they're condemning it on theological grounds, Moses?


There are two completely air tight rebuttals to this point Brian:

1. they are stupid
2. they are mendacious (google: taqqiya)

Now you'll get all sorts of inane arguments as to why its one or the other, but ultimately it will come down to this basic argument: "oh come on, I've read the Quranic translation, I'm sure thats what it means - and here I'll throw in a quote from jihad-watch, plus a quote from some nutjob muslim leader that no one listens to to prove it".


Ah.  Yes, I know what to expect but I remain hopeful there will be some honesty displayed for a change.  At heart, I suppose I am and remain always an optimist.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #109 - Dec 9th, 2014 at 9:51am
 
Brian Ross wrote:

Quote:
No, I am not.  My point has always been that many Christians refer to The Old Testament and all to often forgotten what you claim about it being superseded, themselves, Moses.

You appear unable to accept that many Christians still practice Old Testament Christianity, Moses.  Why?   We have the example of Yadda, who frequently refers to The Old Testament to justify his viewpoint yet you are silent on it.  Why?

Do I detect hypocrisy on your part?


Many Christians quote from the O.T., do they Quote from the Mosaic Law?

Do you know the difference between Mosaic Law and other parts of the O.T.?

Why do you misrepresent the fact that Christ disposed of Mosaic Law Luke 16:16?

Why do you misrepresent the fact that justification by Mosaic law was renounced Romans 3:20  Romans 3:28  Galatians 2:16  Galatians 3:11?

There are parts of the O.T. that are timeless, the law is finished.

Why the continual dishonesty on your part?

Quote:
Quote:
moses wrote: Well here's your big chance, go and ask them for an explanation that clearly shows how the fundamentalists have got it wrong.


Brian Ross wrote: Quote:
He doesn't have to ask them, Moses.  They already have: etc. etc.


Then Gandalf wrote: Quote:
There are two completely air tight rebuttals to this point Brian:

1. they are stupid
2. they are mendacious (google: taqqiya)

Now you'll get all sorts of inane arguments as to why its one or the other, but ultimately it will come down to this basic argument: "oh come on, I've read the Quranic translation, I'm sure thats what it means - and here I'll throw in a quote from jihad-watch, plus a quote from some nutjob muslim leader that no one listens to to prove it".


Neither of you have shown the slightest bit of evidence that the fundamentalists have got the doctrine wrong.

Why do you both run away from this issue?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #110 - Dec 9th, 2014 at 10:52am
 
moses wrote on Dec 9th, 2014 at 9:51am:
Neither of you have shown the slightest bit of evidence that the fundamentalists have got the doctrine wrong.

Why do you both run away from this issue?


By which Allah guides those who pursue His pleasure to the ways of peace and brings them out from darknesses into the light, by His permission, and guides them to a straight path.

Quran 5:16

Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things.

Quran 2:256

And fight them on until there is no more Tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah; but if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression.

Quran 2:193

Words of The Prophet:

Someone said to the Prophet, ‘Pray to God against the idolaters and curse them.’ The Prophet replied, ‘I have been sent to show mercy and have not been sent to curse.’

Thus says the Prophet, ‘Verily those who are patient in adversity and forgive wrongs are the doers of excellence.”

God is not merciful to him who is not so to mankind.

But this is not the first time I've produced these quotes is it moses? Would you say these excerpts from Islamic Doctrine support or refute the actions of ISIS like slaughtering non-combatants, raping and pillaging?

Finally, don't you ever f _ucking dare tell me I've never shown the slightest bit of evidence that the fundamentalists have got the doctrine wrong.   Smiley
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 96375
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #111 - Dec 9th, 2014 at 11:05am
 
moses wrote on Dec 9th, 2014 at 9:51am:
Brian Ross wrote:

Quote:
No, I am not.  My point has always been that many Christians refer to The Old Testament and all to often forgotten what you claim about it being superseded, themselves, Moses.

You appear unable to accept that many Christians still practice Old Testament Christianity, Moses.  Why?   We have the example of Yadda, who frequently refers to The Old Testament to justify his viewpoint yet you are silent on it.  Why?

Do I detect hypocrisy on your part?


Many Christians quote from the O.T., do they Quote from the Mosaic Law?


Absolutely. They point to Leviticus to uncover the Will of God. The quote on lying with a man as with a woman is often coined to condemn homosexuality.

Christian societies have been putting sodomites to death for 2 millennia. A popular form of torture and execution during the Middle Ages was The Spike. Today, homosexuals in African Christian communities are often murdered, justified by Leviticus. Christians were active in campaigning to keep homosexuality illegal in NSW, when it was legalized as recently the 1980s - again referencing Mosaic law.

Your Romans citation says why:

Quote:
3.20 Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin.


Sin, for Christians after Augustine, is defined as being "of the flesh" rather than, for example, the dietary principles of Mosaic law, which were disposed of by St Paul in order to appeal to Romans.

Luke does not dispose of Mosaic law. Read 16:17:

Quote:
The Law and the Prophets were until John; since then the good news of the kingdom of God is preached, and everyone forces his way into it.[a] 17 But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one dot of the Law to become void.


And read Jesus Himself. Matthew 5:17:

Quote:
Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #112 - Dec 9th, 2014 at 5:29pm
 
Gandalf wrote: Quote:
By which Allah guides those who pursue His pleasure to the ways of peace and brings them out from darknesses into the light, by His permission, and guides them to a straight path.

Quran 5:16

Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things.

Quran 2:256

And fight them on until there is no more Tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah; but if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression.

Quran 2:193

Words of The Prophet:

Someone said to the Prophet, ‘Pray to God against the idolaters and curse them.’ The Prophet replied, ‘I have been sent to show mercy and have not been sent to curse.’

Thus says the Prophet, ‘Verily those who are patient in adversity and forgive wrongs are the doers of excellence.”

God is not merciful to him who is not so to mankind.

But this is not the first time I've produced these quotes is it moses? Would you say these excerpts from Islamic Doctrine support or refute the actions of ISIS like slaughtering non-combatants, raping and pillaging?

Finally, don't you ever f _ucking dare tell me I've never shown the slightest bit of evidence that the fundamentalists have got the doctrine wrong.


You have not shown one bit of evidence that the fundamentalists have got it wrong.

You have shown contradictory verses only.

You have not produced any verses / doctrine which absolutely extinguish torture and death for disbelievers, hypocrites and corrupters, which extinguish the hate speech, which extinguish the self alienation from society, which extinguish taqiyya and kitman, which extinguish hijrah and jihad.

To show that something is abolished you need verses which absolutely says so, inconsistencies prove nothing.

I give as an example some verses in the N.T. which absolutely show that the Mosaic law of the O.T. (the favourite of your apologists) was finished.

Quote:
Luke 16:16  The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached , and every man presseth into it.

Rom 3:20  Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

Rom 3:28  Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

Gal 2:16  Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

Gal 3:11  But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.


What this means is that man was not to be stoned to death etc. as  punishment for sins, instead they were to seek forgiveness through faith in Christ.

Nowhere in the qur'an, are the verses which substantiate the actions of fundamentalists, shown as being wrong.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #113 - Dec 9th, 2014 at 5:31pm
 
Karnal wrote:
Quote:
Your Romans citation says why:

Quote:
3.20 Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin.



Sin, for Christians after Augustine, is defined as being "of the flesh" rather than, for example, the dietary principles of Mosaic law, which were disposed of by St Paul in order to appeal to Romans.

Luke does not dispose of Mosaic law. Read 16:17:

Quote:
The Law and the Prophets were until John; since then the good news of the kingdom of God is preached, and everyone forces his way into it.[a] 17 But it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one dot of the Law to become void.



And read Jesus Himself. Matthew 5:17:

Quote:
Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.


You have answered your own questions Karnal, through the law we become conscious of sin, however we cannot be declared righteous by observing the law.

To path to righteousness is not by the deeds of the law, you are justified by faith in Christ.

The law did not become void, it was fulfilled: 

As Christ said in Mathew 5:17  Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

Fulfill verb: to bring to a successful and favourable  finish or completion;

Consequently if the O.T. Law has been successfully brought to a conclusion, it is finished, not applicable to today's Christian.

Quote:
Absolutely. They point to Leviticus to uncover the Will of God. The quote on lying with a man as with a woman is often coined to condemn homosexuality.

Christian societies have been putting sodomites to death for 2 millennia. A popular form of torture and execution during the Middle Ages was The Spike. Today, homosexuals in African Christian communities are often murdered, justified by Leviticus. Christians were active in campaigning to keep homosexuality illegal in NSW, when it was legalized as recently the 1980s - again referencing Mosaic law.


We've been through the bit where Christ concluded the law successfully, He declared it finished.

Now for people who go against the Doctrine of Christ, well once again we see that the answer is contained in the N.T.

Mat 15:9  But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

Mar 7:7  Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

Mat 7:21  Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

Mat 7:22  Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

Mat 7:23  And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Seems clear to me that Christ has unambiguously stated that people who give their own commandments as the doctrine of Christianity, people who commit iniquity are rejected by Christ they are not Christians.

Unlike islam, Christianity can be examined by it's doctrine.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
|dev|null
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #114 - Dec 9th, 2014 at 5:46pm
 
Surely the acts of Christians determines how Christianity should be judged?   Christians throughout history have committed atrocities against both believers and non-believers, justifying their actions by reference to Christian doctrine, quoting bible chapter and verse.   You can't wriggle out that easily Moses!   Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49364
At my desk.
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #115 - Dec 9th, 2014 at 7:18pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8th, 2014 at 11:29pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 8th, 2014 at 10:57pm:
So, you don't think they're condemning it on theological grounds, Moses?


There are two completely air tight rebuttals to this point Brian:

1. they are stupid
2. they are mendacious (google: taqqiya)

Now you'll get all sorts of inane arguments as to why its one or the other, but ultimately it will come down to this basic argument: "oh come on, I've read the Quranic translation, I'm sure thats what it means - and here I'll throw in a quote from jihad-watch, plus a quote from some nutjob muslim leader that no one listens to to prove it".


If no-one listens to him, why is he a leader?

Quote:
Surely the acts of Christians determines how Christianity should be judged?


The acts of Christians determine how those Christians should be judged. It is only when there is a clear link to Christianity that Christianity can rightfully be judged by them.

Quote:
Finally, don't you ever f _ucking dare tell me I've never shown the slightest bit of evidence that the fundamentalists have got the doctrine wrong.


Hmmm. You've never shown the slightest bit of evidence that the fundamentalists have got the doctrine wrong.

Quote:
Thus says the Prophet, ‘Verily those who are patient in adversity and forgive wrongs are the doers of excellence.”


... after a hard day of torturing, thieving, having sex with little girls and beheading a few treacherous Jews.

Quote:
But this is not the first time I've produced these quotes is it moses? Would you say these excerpts from Islamic Doctrine support or refute the actions of ISIS like slaughtering non-combatants, raping and pillaging?


If they utter the same platitudes after a hard days raping and pillaging, verily they follow the example of the prophet and are doers of excellence.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 9th, 2014 at 7:27pm by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 96375
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #116 - Dec 9th, 2014 at 9:07pm
 
Please point out where the Jew Yeheshua declared the laws of Moses "finished", Moses.

I’ll wait for this.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Online


Representative of me

Posts: 42268
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #117 - Dec 9th, 2014 at 11:37pm
 
moses wrote on Dec 9th, 2014 at 9:51am:
Brian Ross wrote:

Quote:
No, I am not.  My point has always been that many Christians refer to The Old Testament and all to often forgotten what you claim about it being superseded, themselves, Moses.

You appear unable to accept that many Christians still practice Old Testament Christianity, Moses.  Why?   We have the example of Yadda, who frequently refers to The Old Testament to justify his viewpoint yet you are silent on it.  Why?

Do I detect hypocrisy on your part?


Many Christians quote from the O.T., do they Quote from the Mosaic Law?


Immaterial, Moses.  They act upon what they read in The Old Testament.  They use The Old Testament to justify their actions.   Until you address that, you will get no where.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #118 - Dec 10th, 2014 at 9:18am
 
moses wrote on Dec 9th, 2014 at 5:29pm:
You have not shown one bit of evidence that the fundamentalists have got it wrong.

You have shown contradictory verses only.


It is evidence, you just don't think its convincing evidence.

If verses that contradict what ISIS believes is not evidence that they have it wrong, please explain to me what would be?


moses wrote on Dec 9th, 2014 at 5:29pm:
You have not produced any verses / doctrine which absolutely extinguish torture and death for disbelievers, hypocrites and corrupters, which extinguish the hate speech, which extinguish the self alienation from society, which extinguish taqiyya and kitman, which extinguish hijrah and jihad.


Don't try and be clever moses, you said I have no evidence that the fundamentalists have got it wrong - don't try and twist this into something else. What I presented is crystal clear evidence against their doctrines - just one example is their belief that killing innocent civilians is islamically justified. A very clear piece of evidence against this belief is in the Quranic command "Let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression." Can you conjur up an argument that explains how targeting and killing innocent women and children is not violating this command? Give it a shot moses, this should be fun.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49364
At my desk.
Re: Combating Islamic Radicalism
Reply #119 - Dec 10th, 2014 at 6:58pm
 
Quote:
What I presented is crystal clear evidence against their doctrines - just one example is their belief that killing innocent civilians is islamically justified.


Do you have any evidence that they believe this? Or do they merely believe, as with that well known UK Imam, that no non-Muslims are innocent? They probably practice the same sort of hypocrisy that defines Islam and the life of Muhammed.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 
Send Topic Print