Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print
Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10 (Read 10644 times)
jackmountain
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 350
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #180 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:08am
 
"And yet I cant imagine even Hilali would have condoned anyone who held up a cafe and killed two people"

Why aren't we shocked I wonder you sit here 24/7 apologizing for muslims

"- I can't even see how someone like Hilali would have even inspired such behaviour."

From various (not Australian) news outlets we learn that our own Muslim pride and joy Sheikh Taj El-Din Hamid Hilaly was invited by the Iranian Islamist (posing as a secular president of Iran) Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to discuss destruction of the Kuffar in general and Zionist Devil (Israel) in particular.
As it turns out Hilaly was invited together with 44 other Egyptian Muslim brotherhood members delegation, probably the elite involved in organizing the riots leading to the fall of pro-Western Mubarak’s regime.

...

And so, indirectly we learn that this vile Islamist, who illegally overstayed his visa in Australia (he became de facto illegal immigrant) and later on was saved from being deported by Paul Keating, IS  in fact a member of Muslim Brotherhood.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad received a visiting Egyptian delegation today in Tehran. The visiting delegation was the Muslim Brotherhood.

...

Although his name is not mentioned in any of the news stories, we can recognize his smiling face in most of the photographs supplied by the Islamic Republic News Agency.

There are so many questions, which we’d like to ask his Australian enablers but let just concentrate on some issues:

Why did Paul Keating and Bob Hawke allow this man to stay in Australia although his racist statements and divisive actions should have indicated he was not a fit person to become a resident of Australia?

TAJ Din al-Hilali has praised militant jihadists in Iraq and Afghanistan, calling them men of the highest order for fighting against coalition forces - which include Australian soldiers - to “liberate” their homelands.

In the interview, Sheik Hilali pays tribute to Sayyid Qutb, the ideologue of the Muslim Brotherhood and intellectual mentor of Osama bin Laden and al-Qa’ida…

In the radio interview, Sheik Hilali says Qutb interpreted the Koran in the “finest manner”. “Sayyid Qutb is an intellectual man ... who gave up his soul in 66 for Islam.”

The outrage today over Hilali does not come from worshippers within his Lakemba mosque, which continued to employ him.

Indeed, who among his many hearers walked out of his Ramadan speech in which he said women without a veil were mostly responsible if they were raped, and raped women should be “jailed for life”?

Instead, Hilali was cheered by many on the weekend when he went back to his mosque. He is strongly defended by Keysar Trad, a Lebanese community “leader” who says he has plenty of ”grass roots” support.




Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:28am by jackmountain »  

#Illridewithinfidels

Never trust a Mussey
 
IP Logged
 
jackmountain
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 350
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #181 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:08am
 
"My question is valid because the alleged culture within the Australian muslim culture you allude to here simply doesnt match up with the circumstances around this case: "



Really.

The Lebanese Sheik Faiz Mohammed gave a lecture in Sydney informing his audience that rape victims have nobody to blame but themselves (women who wear skimpy clothing invite men to rape them).

Quotes:

* ‘The criminal dregs of white society colonised this country [Australia] and now, they only take the select choice of other societies, and the descendants of these criminal dregs tell us that they are better than us’

* ‘…from the Muslim viewpoint, our ideology is the best salvation for the people of Australia, and the people of the world in general. Yes, we are a threat to the culture of drunkenness, paedophilia, and mostly we are a big threat to the culture of ELITISM….’

* ‘They do not film a fat Australian woman in tight bicycle shorts, or tight pants, or an Australian drunk, or a nun, or an Australian welfare cheat. NO!!! They show a Muslim woman wearing a Hijab, she is not assimilating, it would be okay if this same woman walked around in bicycle shorts, with her body vulgarly bulging out to the point of regurgitation.’

* ‘In a way, they feel safe because of the quantity of water which surrounds this country, so they feel fortified behind this great body, it gives them a feeling of security. But the reality is, the land belongs to God, not to them, and if those foreigners, whom they fear as migrants are not permitted to enter as migrants, they will come as settlers, in numbers so large that they will not be able to process them, hold them, or stop them. What will they do then?’

All the above quotes are from Muslim ‘spokesman’ Keysar Trad. Thank you Paul Keating for facilitating the entry of such creatures into our once peaceful country.

And for all those who imagine that Muslims are being ‘picked on’ -

In 2005, Norwegian newspapers reported that Oslo had recorded the highest ever number of rape cases in the previous twelve months. Two out of three persecutions for rape in Oslo are immigrants with an Islamic background and 80% of the victims are Norwegian women.

Norway is not unique.

We have our own unique middle easturd crime team.

Practising Muslims believe they are right in everything they do and say as God is perfect and their holy book the Koran is the word perfect record of God’s will as told to the prophet Mohammed. “Praise be to God who has revealed the Book to His servant shorn of contradictions and unswerving from the truth...” (Koran 18:1)

They also make claim that today, the Koran, held in utmost reverence, is in its original form unadulterated by human hands unlike the Bible and the Torah which they say has been altered/amended to suit the wrong-doers own agendas and not the will of God. Moreover, anyone who does not prescribe to Islam is considered an “unbeliever” which in itself invokes consequences:-

“But if,...they break their oaths, and revile your faith, make war on the leaders of unbelief...” (Koran 9:12) / “Believers do not befriend your fathers or your brothers if they choose unbelief in preference to faith.” (Koran 9:23) / “As for those that disbelieve and debar others from the path of God, We shall chatise them all the more for their misdeeds.” (Koran 16:88)

Clearly then, any ignorant, pejorative, inciteful, and/or offensive statements made against any disbelievers (the infidels) that are spoken by any Muslim is in fact NOT due to any ‘language barriers’ that they would have us believe but rather said statements are DUE to their offensive religious beliefs, recorded for all to see in the Koran.
Back to top
 

#Illridewithinfidels

Never trust a Mussey
 
IP Logged
 
jackmountain
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 350
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #182 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:08am
 

As is evident with Hilaly’s ‘cat meat’ analogy which is completely aligned to the teachings in the Koran in particular refer sections 33:30-33:35 and 33:57-33:63, for example:

“Prophet, enjoin your wives, your daughters, and the wives of true believers to draw their veils close round them. That is more proper, so that they may be recognised and not be molested.”

It then does not follow that Hilaly is in fact an extremist, nor does it follow that any practising Muslim (despite their protests) can in all honesty proclaim that Hilaly does not speak for ALL Muslims when he obviously does, as his teachings are analogous to the Koran.

Hilaly’s infamous sermon has plunged the Australian Islamic Council into a very precarious position indeed.  I can not see how any reprimanding of Hilaly is a realistic option for them as to do so, by implication, would mean that they are reprimanding Islam and their prophet Mohammed.

That is of course unless a very ‘creative’ scholar can find a ‘righteous’ way out of this predicament - you never know, maybe ALLAH will accept Hilaly as a sacrificial lamb (scape goat) for the greater good of Islam.




"firstly he was imported here by the Australian government - not invited and not created by the Australian muslims; secondly he was rejected and shunned by mainstream muslims;"

Who please list them all oh wise muslim?


"thirdly he was reported to the police by the muslims - because of his extremism."

Who list them all, cool story ?


"So once again, what else exactly could the muslim community have done? Somehow force the police to be more vigilant? Take the law into their own hands?"

Assimilate and shout down the fool and sack him immediately. That never happened because they clearly agreed with him.


"I am also interested in an answer to my follow up question: did the existence of islam or a muslim community make this man more likely to carry out his crime?"

The existence of the Koran that IS Islam for ALL Muslims by instructing him to do so.
Back to top
 

#Illridewithinfidels

Never trust a Mussey
 
IP Logged
 
jackmountain
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 350
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #183 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:09am
 
The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule.  Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.  Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text.  They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the Quran. 

The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God, however this can work both ways.  Most of today's Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book's call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence.  Apologists cater to their preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to scrutiny.  Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology.

Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed.  Muhammad's own martial legacy - and that of his companions - along with the remarkable stress on violence found in the Quran have produced a trail of blood and tears across world history.

The Quran:
Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing...
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"  (Translation is from the Noble Quran)  The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries.  In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did).  The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse).  The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation.  Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until "religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."  Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time.  From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".  This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."  The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter.  These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah.  This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.
Back to top
 

#Illridewithinfidels

Never trust a Mussey
 
IP Logged
 
jackmountain
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 350
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #184 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:09am
 

Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-"  This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes.  It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle.  Not only is the Arabic word used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption.  (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is reflected in other translations of the verse).

Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..."  Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"  No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah"  Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for  2:193).  The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj.  Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction.  The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did).  Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition.  According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember." 

Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape.  Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."
Back to top
 

#Illridewithinfidels

Never trust a Mussey
 
IP Logged
 
jackmountain
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 350
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #185 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:10am
 
Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."  According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars).  This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack.  Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months).  The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat.  Once the Muslims had the power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.

Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.

Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant."  The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad".  The context is obviously holy war.

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."  "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews.  According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status.  This was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years.  Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"

Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place."  This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew."  See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them"  This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).

Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."  Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter.  It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."

Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."  How does the Quran define a true believer?
Back to top
 

#Illridewithinfidels

Never trust a Mussey
 
IP Logged
 
jackmountain
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 350
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #186 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:10am
 
Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction."  Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction."  (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).

Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion.  The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation.  One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74).  However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude."  He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son.  (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia.  Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)

Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"

Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."   "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context.  It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while.  Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."   This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers.  It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do.  If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.

Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost."  Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad.  The wounded are to be held captive for ransom.  The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims.  Those who kill pass the test.

Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"   

Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom."  Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.'  Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted?  This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.
Back to top
 

#Illridewithinfidels

Never trust a Mussey
 
IP Logged
 
jackmountain
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 350
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #187 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:10am
 
Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves"  Islam is not about treating everyone equally.  There are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status.  Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' in verse 16.

Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way"  Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict.  This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist."  (See next verse, below).  Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.

Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success."  This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above).  It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end."  The root word of "Jihad" is used again here.  The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.





"And if so, I expect a damn good rationale for it - because the evidence seems rather clear on this particular matter: "

Yes it does he became a threat after

A - Following Islam and becoming a muslim that follows Allah like ALL muslims are suppossed to do and therefore was free to carry out the terrorist attack when he did.


YES MORONITS EVERYONE ELSES FAULT BUT SICK ISLAM.....

Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:30am by jackmountain »  

#Illridewithinfidels

Never trust a Mussey
 
IP Logged
 
jackmountain
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 350
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #188 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:21am
 
Let’s be honest: Man Haron Monis was an IS terrorist

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/lets-be-honest-man-haron-monis-was-an-is-terrorist/story-fni0cwl5-1227158489614

AUSTRALIA has watched anxiously as its citizens travelled to Syria and Iraq to take up arms for IS but Man Haron Monis did the opposite — he brought IS to Australia.

As much as some commentators may not want to admit it, Monis followed the IS playbook to the letter.

Capture worldwide media attention by taking “disbelievers” hostage. Tick.

Raise a jihadist flag. Tick.

Film the terrorised hostages in front of said flag. Tick.

Kill an American, European, Australian or Canadian. Sadly, tick.

But as the first Islamic terror attack against Australian civilians on home soil reached a bloody end, many observers have been at pains to distance Monis from terrorism.

Seven’s Sunrise host David Koch assured viewers over and over that there was no link between Monis and IS.

Monis’ former lawyer Manny Conditsis claimed the Lindt cafe attack was “not a concerted terrorism event or act”. “This was a one-off random individual,” he told the ABC.

Sydney barrister Larissa Andelman tweeted that the notion of “Islamic terror” was “not supported by the facts”. “More like Martin Byrant in Tasmania. Lone crazy guy,” she wrote.

Monis was certainly crazy — but show me a terrorist that isn’t.

That Monis — a long-time purveyor of hate who boasted almost 15,000 Facebook followers — acted as a “lone wolf” is hardly relevant when assessing whether he saw himself acting on behalf of IS.

It is IS’ ability to attract disenfranchised individuals through its horrific social media campaigns that makes it a global menace. If Osama bin Laden ran al-Qaeda for company men, IS is open to freelancers.

There is no need to fill in a membership form to join IS’ bloodthirsty quest; no need to declare if you are single or part of a group; no need to wait for an instruction to attack.

“If you can kill a disbelieving American or European ... or an Australian or a Canadian, or any other disbeliever from the disbelievers waging war, including the citizens of the countries that entered into a coalition against the Islamic State, then rely on Allah, and kill him in any manner or way, however it may be,’’ IS spokesman Abu Muhammad al-Adnani declared in September.

Monis’ attack came after other so-called “lone wolves” acted in Ottawa, Jerusalem and New York in the wake of IS’ September edict.

While veteran Australian security expert Neil Fergus said IS would “try to claim” the cafe attack as one of its own, Monis himself was desperate to declare it so.

The three videos uploaded to YouTube showed three of Monis’ poor hostage victims calling on the media to report that “this is an attack on Australia by IS”.

Monis also promised, through the hostages’ videos, to release one of his victims if an IS flag was delivered to the cafe.

Attempts to write off Monis as a self-styled cleric are also wide of the mark. Conditsis pointed out his former client was a Muslim cleric in Iran before he received political asylum in Australia in about 2001.

There can be also no doubt that his attack was a terrorist act, as defined under Australia’s Criminal Code Act 1995.

The code says: “A ‘terrorist act’ is an act, or a threat to commit an act, that is done with the intention to coerce or influence the public or any government by intimidation to advance a political, religious or ideological cause, and the act causes: death, serious harm or endangers a person.”

Put simply, Monis acted to advance a political, religious or ideological cause and endangered people.

He was a terrorist, clearly influenced by IS. Let’s be honest. His victims deserve at least that.

Maybe you are just THICK. My guess is just another islamic blind follower that can't think for himself.
Back to top
 

#Illridewithinfidels

Never trust a Mussey
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96364
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #189 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 9:21am
 
Good to see you back, ServerErr. We’re a fun bunch. We’re all a little crazy though!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #190 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 10:43am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 19th, 2014 at 11:37pm:
Soren wrote on Dec 19th, 2014 at 10:26pm:
You ask such a question after you had Al hilali as your grand mufti for a decade or more. After you had incubated 70 jihadis now in Syria. After you have boycotted Abbott for wanting to include you in Team Australia - ie include you regardless of your history.


And yet I cant imagine even Hilali would have condoned anyone who held up a cafe and killed two people - I can't even see how someone like Hilali would have even inspired such behaviour. My question is valid because the alleged culture within the Australian muslim culture you allude to here simply doesnt match up with the circumstances around this case: firstly he was imported here by the Australian government - not invited and not created by the Australian muslims; secondly he was rejected and shunned by mainstream muslims; thirdly he was reported to the police by the muslims - because of his extremism. So once again, what else exactly could the muslim community have done? Somehow force the police to be more vigilant? Take the law into their own hands?

I am also interested in an answer to my follow up question: did the existence of islam or a muslim community make this man more likely to carry out his crime? And if so, I expect a damn good rationale for it - because the evidence seems rather clear on this particular matter: he became a threat after a) the police failed to follow up on warnings received by the muslim community itself and b) he was granted bail after being charged as an accessory to his ex-wife's murder - and therefore was free to carry out the hold-up when he did.




I think it's the same failure, the same timidity that has allowed rape gangs to operate in England because authorities are afraid to appear racist.


When Abbott called  for unity - Team Australia - he was attacked by Muslims. If authorities deal with Muslim terrorism, they are denounced as racist islamophobes.  SO one thing you all could do is face facts: there are Muslim terrorists among you. There is nothing Islamophobic or racist in realising and accepting that.  ANd once you realise and accept it,you will know what to do about it.  The first thing on your what-to-do list is to acknowledge that you have a problem in your midst.i
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18652
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #191 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 10:48am
 
jackmountain wrote on Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:21am:
Let’s be honest: Man Haron Monis was an IS terrorist

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/lets-be-honest-man-haron-monis-was-an-is-terrorist/story-fni0cwl5-1227158489614

AUSTRALIA has watched anxiously as its citizens travelled to Syria and Iraq to take up arms for IS but Man Haron Monis did the opposite — he brought IS to Australia.

But as the first Islamic terror attack against Australian civilians on home soil reached a bloody end, many observers have been at pains to distance Monis from terrorism.

Seven’s Sunrise host David Koch assured viewers over and over that there was no link between Monis and IS.

Sydney barrister Larissa Andelman tweeted that the notion of “Islamic terror” was “not supported by the facts”. “More like Martin Byrant in Tasmania. Lone crazy guy,” she wrote.

That Monis — a long-time purveyor of hate who boasted almost 15,000 Facebook followers — acted as a “lone wolf”

There is no need to fill in a membership form to join IS’ bloodthirsty quest; no need to declare if you are single or part of a group; no need to wait for an instruction to attack.

The three videos uploaded to YouTube showed three of Monis’ poor hostage victims calling on the media to report that “this is an attack on Australia by IS”.

Attempts to write off Monis as a self-styled cleric are also wide of the mark. Conditsis pointed out his former client was a Muslim cleric in Iran before he received political asylum in Australia in about 2001.

Put simply, Monis acted to advance a political, religious or ideological cause and endangered people.

He was a terrorist, clearly influenced by IS. Let’s be honest. His victims deserve at least that.


This was not the first Islamic terror attack in Australia, the first Islamic terror attack happened nearly 100 years ago, why are the apologists so ignorant?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Broken_Hill

The Islamic state is like the church with recruiting, all you have to do is walk in and they will accept you if you want to join them.


Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 96364
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #192 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 10:57am
 
Soren wrote on Dec 20th, 2014 at 10:43am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 19th, 2014 at 11:37pm:
Soren wrote on Dec 19th, 2014 at 10:26pm:
You ask such a question after you had Al hilali as your grand mufti for a decade or more. After you had incubated 70 jihadis now in Syria. After you have boycotted Abbott for wanting to include you in Team Australia - ie include you regardless of your history.


And yet I cant imagine even Hilali would have condoned anyone who held up a cafe and killed two people - I can't even see how someone like Hilali would have even inspired such behaviour. My question is valid because the alleged culture within the Australian muslim culture you allude to here simply doesnt match up with the circumstances around this case: firstly he was imported here by the Australian government - not invited and not created by the Australian muslims; secondly he was rejected and shunned by mainstream muslims; thirdly he was reported to the police by the muslims - because of his extremism. So once again, what else exactly could the muslim community have done? Somehow force the police to be more vigilant? Take the law into their own hands?

I am also interested in an answer to my follow up question: did the existence of islam or a muslim community make this man more likely to carry out his crime? And if so, I expect a damn good rationale for it - because the evidence seems rather clear on this particular matter: he became a threat after a) the police failed to follow up on warnings received by the muslim community itself and b) he was granted bail after being charged as an accessory to his ex-wife's murder - and therefore was free to carry out the hold-up when he did.




I think it's the same failure, the same timidity that has allowed rape gangs to operate in England because authorities are afraid to appear racist.


When Abbott called  for unity - Team Australia - he was attacked by Muslims. If authorities deal with Muslim terrorism, they are denounced as racist islamophobes.  SO one thing you all could do is face facts: there are Muslim terrorists among you. There is nothing Islamophobic or racist in realising and accepting that.  ANd once you realise and accept it,you will know what to do about it.  The first thing on your what-to-do list is to acknowledge that you have a problem in your midst.



When did the upgrade from "grooming" gangs to rape gangs happen, old chap?

The Faculty is most keen to study this phenomenon.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 42248
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #193 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 11:46am
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 20th, 2014 at 10:48am:
The Islamic state is like the church with recruiting, all you have to do is walk in and they will accept you if you want to join them.


Unless you're Sh'ia.  Unless you proclaim that you practice "Black magic".  Unless you are a rapist (of Sunni Muslim women - yes, that's even a step too far for them, it appears), etc., etc.

The assumption here is that Islam is monolithic and of course that IS has no standards and will compromise it's own narrow Takfiri interpretation of Islam to allow any Tom, Dick or Harry into their ranks.      Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: Islamic state- Selling Yazidi sex slaves for $10
Reply #194 - Dec 20th, 2014 at 12:00pm
 
Karnal wrote on Dec 20th, 2014 at 10:57am:
Soren wrote on Dec 20th, 2014 at 10:43am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 19th, 2014 at 11:37pm:
Soren wrote on Dec 19th, 2014 at 10:26pm:
You ask such a question after you had Al hilali as your grand mufti for a decade or more. After you had incubated 70 jihadis now in Syria. After you have boycotted Abbott for wanting to include you in Team Australia - ie include you regardless of your history.


And yet I cant imagine even Hilali would have condoned anyone who held up a cafe and killed two people - I can't even see how someone like Hilali would have even inspired such behaviour. My question is valid because the alleged culture within the Australian muslim culture you allude to here simply doesnt match up with the circumstances around this case: firstly he was imported here by the Australian government - not invited and not created by the Australian muslims; secondly he was rejected and shunned by mainstream muslims; thirdly he was reported to the police by the muslims - because of his extremism. So once again, what else exactly could the muslim community have done? Somehow force the police to be more vigilant? Take the law into their own hands?

I am also interested in an answer to my follow up question: did the existence of islam or a muslim community make this man more likely to carry out his crime? And if so, I expect a damn good rationale for it - because the evidence seems rather clear on this particular matter: he became a threat after a) the police failed to follow up on warnings received by the muslim community itself and b) he was granted bail after being charged as an accessory to his ex-wife's murder - and therefore was free to carry out the hold-up when he did.




I think it's the same failure, the same timidity that has allowed rape gangs to operate in England because authorities are afraid to appear racist.


When Abbott called  for unity - Team Australia - he was attacked by Muslims. If authorities deal with Muslim terrorism, they are denounced as racist islamophobes.  SO one thing you all could do is face facts: there are Muslim terrorists among you. There is nothing Islamophobic or racist in realising and accepting that.  ANd once you realise and accept it,you will know what to do about it.  The first thing on your what-to-do list is to acknowledge that you have a problem in your midst.



When did the upgrade from "grooming" gangs to rape gangs happen, old chap?

The Faculty is most keen to study this phenomenon.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28939089
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print