Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 11
Send Topic Print
Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni (Read 9646 times)
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #15 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 11:43am
 
Don't lie Ian - the first link from the oz is 404 - but the other two work fine and are more than enough to refute your silly claim.

You said it was a fact that most Australians definitely oppose muslim immigration and only a fool would argue otherwise. A bold claim with no evidence wouldn't you say?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #16 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 11:43am
 
ColdFact wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 8:50am:
A journalist is supposed to be just that -- not a muck-raking bigot, liar and racist trying to unnecessarily  stir up hatred.

Here's what the business commentator for the SMH, Michael Pascoe said about Pickering in 2012.

"Pickering is commonly known as a cartoonist, but he's also an inveterate liar, a bankrupt conman with a seedy history of fleecing the gullible of millions of dollars while not paying his own bills.

"With various failed business ventures and numerous personal relationships of equal standard, for decades he has plied a grubby trade behind sundry stooges and partners, assisted by the odd sharp lawyer and hapless corporate and consumer regulators. He is not a nice man."

http://www.smh.com.au/business/larry-pickering--the-conman-stalking-gillard-2012...


Good article, ColdFact.

Now would you like to address the actual points that were raised and mulled over by Pickering?

Thank you in advance.

Have you thrown out all your Rolf Harris videos and CDs? No?

Content, ColdFact ... content is all we need concern ourself with if we are intelligent adults.

A truth is a truth even if the worst of liars delivers it.



Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #17 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 12:02pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 11:43am:
Don't lie Ian - the first link from the oz is 404 - but the other two work fine and are more than enough to refute your silly claim.

You said it was a fact that most Australians definitely oppose muslim immigration and only a fool would argue otherwise. A bold claim with no evidence wouldn't you say? 
What? Hang on, didnt you just accuse me of lying because they all worked?  So you didnt check the links before you accused me of lying. In fact only one works for me. My comment about Muslim immigration stands, but here you are arguing otherwise without any substance. If I was you i wouldnt accuse others of lying Gandalf.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #18 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 1:21pm
 
"Immigration is now consistently the most important political issue of concern to voters, pollsters have revealed.

Over the past year it has moved ahead of the economy as the British public’s top priority, according to YouGov.

Since May, voters have put it above or tied with the economy in every survey conducted by the organisation.

At one point, in September, it was selected by 58 per cent of voters as one of the three most important issues for the country while only 48 per cent had the economy in their top three.


***

"Crossbench peer Lord Green of Deddington, chairman of the MigrationWatch think tank, said: ‘These are remarkable findings. It’s simply not possible for the political class to remain in denial any longer.

‘Suggestions that those who are canvassing should simply change the subject are now clearly absurd. The public want effective answers on immigration and will see through attempts to dodge the issue.".


link
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ColdFact
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 359
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #19 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 5:18pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 11:43am:
ColdFact wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 8:50am:
A journalist is supposed to be just that -- not a muck-raking bigot, liar and racist trying to unnecessarily  stir up hatred.

Here's what the business commentator for the SMH, Michael Pascoe said about Pickering in 2012.

"Pickering is commonly known as a cartoonist, but he's also an inveterate liar, a bankrupt conman with a seedy history of fleecing the gullible of millions of dollars while not paying his own bills.

"With various failed business ventures and numerous personal relationships of equal standard, for decades he has plied a grubby trade behind sundry stooges and partners, assisted by the odd sharp lawyer and hapless corporate and consumer regulators. He is not a nice man."

http://www.smh.com.au/business/larry-pickering--the-conman-stalking-gillard-2012...


Good article, ColdFact.

Now would you like to address the actual points that were raised and mulled over by Pickering?

Thank you in advance.




Well normally no I wouldn't because it's a racist rant.  But since you asked Herb I did go back and assess the article:

Pickering says that "half of all Australians surveyed had anti-Muslim sentiments".

And I found the ABC report of that survey:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-02-23/nearly-half-of-australians-are-anti-muslim...

So let's take a look:

10% were prejudiced against 'other' cultures.
25% said they were anti-Semitic or anti-Asian
"While a slightly larger number were prejudiced against Aboriginies".

Then we have the line, "Anti-Muslim sentiment was even higher, at 48.6 per cent."

Followed by the line: "Lead researcher Professor Kevin Dunn from the University of Western Sydney says recent political rhetoric has not helped.

"If you continue to speak about a group as a problem, whether that be asylum seekers or Muslims, that will [be] cast within the public mind," he said.

So from the stats we can deduct -- depending on how the survey questions were presented -- that Australia houses a large contingent of racist views, that are perpetuated by governments and the media.

So let's take Pickering's view.

It doesn't take him long to turn a survey about Australian's attitudes into a fabricated article about "terrorism related crimes" -- we presume in Australia.
I personally don't know of any, and he didn't list any.
Remember Monis was a fake Muslim disowned and actually reported by the Islamic community to the Australian Government as a disinformation agent.
And even the media are saying it was a 'lone nut' crime -- not a terror related crime.

He mentions ISIS mercenaries but omits the greater numbers of Australians fighting for the Israeli Defence Force in their butchering of Gaza civilians.

Islam is no greater threat to Australia than Catholicism -- and as I was a good Catholic boy living in the largest Muslim hub in Australia, I think I am mildly qualified to offer that opinion.







Back to top
 

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #20 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 5:57pm
 
ColdFact wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 5:18pm:
Well normally no I wouldn't because it's a racist rant.


I've lost count of how many people in just the past 12 months I've encountered who have chosen, of their own volition, to knowingly and mischievously reinterpret the term 'racist' to include criticism of another's culture, religion, and social values.

The socialist elite in the west are always trying to expand the goal posts so that legitimate criticism falls into the net as 'foul balls' because of newly cobbled-together definitions of what comprises racism, and bigotry.

Your very first sentence disqualifies you from having me, or others, take you seriously.

Criticism of someone's culture, religion, and social values comes within the purview of exercising a legitimate and respectable opinion as may be indulged in under the freedoms granted us under our Westminster system of representative democracy.

The politicians made a mistake in flooding western nations with foreigners, and every since then the social engineers have been busy at work ramping up the vilification laws while demonising anyone who dares raise an objection to having his ancestral homeland shot-through with foreigners and turned into modern Towers of Babel.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Dec 29th, 2014 at 6:59pm by Lord Herbert »  
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #21 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 6:01pm
 
ian wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 12:02pm:
What? Hang on, didnt you just accuse me of lying because they all worked?


No I accused you of lying - and am still accusing you of lying - for saying "still getting 404 on those links (plural). You do accept that only one link is not working, and that this claim was therefore a lie don't you?

But more importantly, your claim - your completely baseless claim - that the vast majority of Australians are against muslim immigration, that that is a fact, and that only a fool would say otherwise - is idiotic, is baseless, and is full of sh*t - would you agree?

Almost on a par with your "halal only refers to food" gem.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #22 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 6:05pm
 
Oh wait, almost missed this...

ian wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 12:02pm:
My comment about Muslim immigration stands, but here you are arguing otherwise
without any substance
.


classic Ian idiocy.

If you are going to bullshit, bullshit hard - Ian style  Grin
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
ColdFact
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 359
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #23 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 6:07pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 5:57pm:
ColdFact wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 5:18pm:
Well normally no I wouldn't because it's a racist rant.


I've lost count of how many people in just the past 12 months I've encountered who have chosen, of their own volition, to knowingly and mischievously reinterpret the term 'racist' to include criticism of another's culture, religion, and social values.

The socialist elite in the west are always trying to expand the goal posts so that legitimate criticism falls into the net as 'foul balls' because of newly-cobbled together definitions of what comprises racism, and bigotry.

Your very first sentence disqualifies you from having me, or others, take you seriously.

Criticism of someone's culture, religion, and social values comes within the purview of exercising a legitimate and respectable opinion as may be indulged in under the freedoms granted us under our Westminster system of representative democracy.

The politicians made a mistake in flooding western nations with foreigners, and every since then the social engineers have been busy at work ramping up the vilification laws while demonising anyone who dares raise an objection to having his ancestral homeland shot-through with foreigners and turned into modern Towers of Babel.



Ok Herb if we're going to get into semantics, Islam refers to a religion, not a race, just like Judaism etc.  So is it the religion or the various races of peoples that practice the religion that you or Pickering want to discriminate against?


Back to top
 

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
 
IP Logged
 
Julius Abbott
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 792
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #24 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 6:25pm
 
Pickering is an idiot. You can tell that his incoherent article is mostly lifted from wikipedia entries.
Back to top
 

Abbott promised no tax hikes & no cuts to the ABC

There's a 'budget emergency', so we will give $9 billion to the Reserve Bank, spend $12 billion on some dubious jets, $2 billion to bomb Iraq, etc.
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #25 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 7:10pm
 
ColdFact wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 6:07pm:
Ok Herb if we're going to get into semantics,


'Semantics'?

The incorrect definition of a term is just as valid as the correct definition ... unless you're some finicky anal-retentive who wants to make an issue of it?

Are you for real?

Sorry, but your time is up.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #26 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 7:13pm
 
Julius Abbott wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 6:25pm:
Pickering is an idiot. You can tell that his incoherent article is mostly lifted from wikipedia entries.


So ... um ... what precisely don't you agree with in the article, and for what reasons?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #27 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 7:36pm
 
Julius Abbott wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 6:25pm:
Pickering is an idiot.



Indeed.

That's exactly why trolls like Aunt Herbie love him so much.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #28 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 7:45pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 6:01pm:
ian wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 12:02pm:
What? Hang on, didnt you just accuse me of lying because they all worked?


No I accused you of lying - and am still accusing you of lying - for saying "still getting 404 on those links (plural). You do accept that only one link is not working, and that this claim was therefore a lie don't you?

But more importantly, your claim - your completely baseless claim - that the vast majority of Australians are against muslim immigration, that that is a fact, and that only a fool would say otherwise - is idiotic, is baseless, and is full of sh*t - would you agree?

Almost on a par with your "halal only refers to food" gem.
in other words, you lied when you stated all the links were working. My claim stands and is supported by Siorens subsequent post with a link which actually worked.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male
Re: Some interesting history here: Shia v Sunni
Reply #29 - Dec 29th, 2014 at 7:48pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 7:13pm:
Julius Abbott wrote on Dec 29th, 2014 at 6:25pm:
Pickering is an idiot. You can tell that his incoherent article is mostly lifted from wikipedia entries.


So ... um ... what precisely don't you agree with in the article, and for what reasons?



" ... it’s safe to assume that the vast majority of Australians now want something substantive done about the Islamic threat."

No.  It's never safe to assume.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 11
Send Topic Print