Swagman wrote on Dec 31
st, 2014 at 10:26pm:
Setanta wrote on Dec 31
st, 2014 at 10:23pm:
Swagman wrote on Dec 31
st, 2014 at 10:16pm:
The State's need to pay off their own bouts of Labor extravagances too...
You mean how Barnett has been in for 5 years and has ruined the state? I think both sides have some mud. The point remains, what is trickling where.
The downtrodden benefit from taxation. Trickle down, income redistribution, call it what you want it's the same thing.
The wealthy benefit from a civil society. Trade in kind.
edit: If trickle down, the most preposterous of claims, is redistribution, where should the wealth remain? Redistribution is bad, yes? So anything that trickles down is bad, it doesn't but let's pretend for now. The alternative is everything stays at the top is your answer. Life is a game of monopoly and there can be only one.
Money is blood, it needs to flow, allowing those that need it and will spend it, to have more will produce demand. Where is the demand in "supply and demand" if no-one has money? What happens to supply? Save it for a rainy day?
A healthy middle and lower class help the economy more than a few leeches, they are what create wealth.