polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 5
th, 2015 at 8:25pm:
Well FD, if we are talking about wanting pretty girls being allowed to freely get around in short skirts in Kabul, then the Soviet backed communist regime was quite ideal - they were socially progressive, secular and anti-islamist. Not so good for democracy, of course, but then again the bearded nutjobs that the US chose as their instrument to overthrow the communists didn't exactly have freedom and democracy in mind either.
On balance though, if its a choice between the communists and the bearded nutjobs that the US supported, the communists win on the overall freedom and progressiveness scale - hands down. You see, while you may rail against the evils of communism, the reality was that girls were getting around in short skirts and freely fraternising with non-relative maies - not to mention getting educated and having careers. When the US-funded bearded nutjobs took over, those pretty girls started to get raped, shot and generally terrorised off the streets. And to keep law and order, the warlords were firing artillery rounds into unarmed civilians and running over people with tanks.
Which do you think was better FD?
The ladies were getting around in Kabul showing not only hair but legs in the 1960's
The Soviet influence didn't start till around 1978, the Afghan women didn't need communism to show some leg they were doing it before the commies arrived.
The Soviets started to withdraw around 1989 and when the USSR collapsed around 1991 all support for Afghanistan was withdrawn
It was the early 1990's when Afghanistan became an Islamic republic by mid 90's the Taliban was ruling,mini skirts were out Burqas were in.
Saudi Arabia and Iran supported militias in Afghanistan during their civil war,much like they do in Iraq and Syria today with more war between rival sects of Islam.
Afghanistan and Iran show how quickly a country can be taken over and have Islamic rule imposed on the people.