cods wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 7:47am:



Of course most child sexual abuse happens in the home, usually committed by a lone perpetrator, that's simply because most kids live in the home, but this is about something else, those powerful men and women within the community that band together to form a pedophile ring in which they entice the unsuspecting victim into their chamber of horrors.

Royalty must read Indian Philosophy:


Quote:

https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2012/11/21/lord-mandelson-prince-andrew-shaun-woodw...

HOW THE POWER OF PRIVILEGE PROTECTS THE PERVERT: A CASE HISTORY



Epstein and friend, Prince Andrew



American bond and hedge fund mogul Jeffrey Epstein went to prison in 2010 – albeit briefly – having been found guilty by a US Court of soliciting prostitution from a minor. How and why he escaped a more hefty jail sentence – despite overwhelming evidence of sex crimes with dozens of young girls – remains something guaranteed to make the neutral’s blood boil.

The U.S. attorney who led the Epstein prosecution in Florida’s Southern District commented publicly on the case once it was no longer sub judice, even giving Tina Brown’s highly respected Daily Beast exclusive access to his view in the form of a long open letter. The following facts, among others, emerged: three 12-year-old French girls were delivered to him for his twisted pleasure as a birthday present. Epstein had purchased a “Balkan sex slave” from her family when she was just 14. And the FBI identified around 40 young women, most of them underage at the time, who had been coaxed into Epstein’s Palm Beach home on the request for a “massage” for money…..then forced into various sexual tableaux.

The judiciary knew all about this when Epstein was sentenced. In the US, sex crimes of this nature typically carry a term of 10 to 20 years in prison.  Indeed, the very fact of serious FBI involvement makes clear that the crimes were considered to be extremely serious, organised, and professionally rewarded.

Yet Jeffrey Epstein was sentenced to just 13 months in jail.

The Beast also described how ‘Fear and intimidation experienced by victims during pre-trial proceedings, combined with a ferocious, protracted campaign to undermine the prosecution, culminated in a set of charges that became a virtual slap on the wrist.’ Tina Brown is married to the London Times legend Harry Evans, an editor whose Insight investigations were the envy of the world. For her to print an accusation so blatantly means she knew it to be fact. And I’d imagine that Evans encouraged her to go with it. The combined experience of the couple is awesome.

Treading on toxic ground, the Daily Mail later got one of Epstein’s victims to go public, and describe her years as “a teenage sex toy”. The woman concerned, Virginia Roberts, produced a photograph of herself with Prince Andrew. It dated from 2001 – when she was 15 – and the ‘toy’ alleged that Epstein had paid her $15,000 to ‘meet’ the prince. The general tone of the piece was to suggest that Epstein had been pimping her around his circle over several years – before the age of 15 – while at the same time regularly abusing the girl.

Yet Jeffrey Epstein was sentenced to just 13 months in jail.

In 2005, a young girl first brought sex-crime allegations against Jeffrey Epstein to the Palm Beach Police Department, which sought felony charges against Epstein. Subsequently, however, the State Attorney agreed to charge him “only with one count of aggravated assault with no intent to commit a felony”. The difference between the US and Britain, however, is that when faced with an obvious perversion of justice, law officers don’t always look the other way. The attorney concerned, R. Alexander Acosta, brought in the State and then the FBI, who in turn alerted the Attorney General’s office in Washington. But it was 2010 before Epstein started his prison sentence.

And Jeffrey Epstein was sentenced to just 13 months in jail.

cods wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 7:47am:



and you are right.  I believe the figure is around 90% of abuse occurs within the family.  so the important thing then of course is to concentrate on outsiders and strangers because that makes so much sense.

people are so stupid.

it_is_the_light wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 11:06am:




Dear master Light,

Longnose does appear at times to be an apologist for royalty.

Perhaps it's not intentional?

In any case  - he is forgiven

namaste

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 10:49am:



People are not so stupid.

Child sexual abuse victims at the hands of relatives is a whole different ball game. Because most of the perpetrators can't be nailed doesn't mean the high profile pedophiles should get away with their pedophile syndicates, does it?

Children are threatened not to tell by dear old Uncle Albert, whereas the children used in pedophile rings are meticulously selected and sometimes groomed to be the play things of the rich and famous.

With family abuse it's usually one person and one child, whereas the child is abused by many different people within the pedo ring.

The police have to rely on the victim or a family member coming forward before they can make enquiries, whereas it's usually loose mouths or rumours floating around that sinks someone within the pedo ring, then it's just a matter of time before they're all named, or a couple of victims come forward as in the Savile and Harris cases.

Master Light

Oh brother of enlightenment

tell me all will be revealed

is it time

to bring the dark side to justice?

will the freemasonic cult be exposed?

is anyone too powerful to avoid

the full force of the law?

These people can never be tried in the UK or Europe, they will have to be sent to China or Japan where a fair trial will be held without favour or prejudice.




Westminster paedophile ring: Jailed Charles Napier will be told to name VIP abusers

Caged child abuser Charles Napier faces a grilling by detectives who believe he could help expose a network of VIP paedophiles with links to Westminster.

Officers probing claims that span decades think the former teacher – jailed last week for abusing 23 boys – can name Establishment figures including peers, Government ministers, ­civil servants and police.

..........................................................................


KEY ALLEGATIONS: WHAT CLAIMS ARE MADE BY JANE DOES 3 AND 4

- Jeffrey Epstein forced Jane Doe 3 to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew between 1999 and 2002.

- The girl had sex with the Prince when she 17, which is considered underage in Florida

- They met for sex in London, New York and on Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands

- On the final occasion Prince Andrew had sex with her in an 'orgy with numerous other under-aged girls'

- She was told by the Epstein 'to give the Prince whatever he demanded and report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse'

- Robert Maxwell's youngest daughter Ghislaine acted as a 'madame' for the girl and allowed Prince Andrew to have sex with her in her London home, documents claim

- In 2002, Jane Doe 4, described at the time as a 'poor and vulnerable 16-year-old' alleges she was told that she could make $300 by 'giving an old man a massage' in Florida

- Epstein subsequently committed 'sexual acts against Jane Doe 4 on many occasions', court documents claim

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/i-will-not-be-bullied-into-silence-woman-who-...i