Australian Politics Forum - Prince Andrew a pedo?

Svengali

Gold Member

Offline

Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male

Re: Prince Andrew a pedo?
Reply #75 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:40pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:30pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 11:52am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 10:49am:

and you are right. I believe the figure is around 90% of abuse occurs within the family. so the important thing then of course is to concentrate on outsiders and strangers because that makes so much sense.

people are so stupid.

People are not so stupid.

Child sexual abuse victims at the hands of relatives is a whole different ball game. Because most of the perpetrators can't be nailed doesn't mean the high profile pedophiles should get away with their pedophile syndicates, does it?

Children are threatened not to tell by dear old Uncle Albert, whereas the children used in pedophile rings are meticulously selected and sometimes groomed to be the play things of the rich and famous.

With family abuse it's usually one person and one child, whereas the child is abused by many different people within the pedo ring.

The police have to rely on the victim or a family member coming forward before they can make enquiries, whereas it's usually loose mouths or rumours floating around that sinks someone within the pedo ring, then it's just a matter of time before they're all named, or a couple of victims come forward as in the Savile and Harris cases.

im not sure what your point is. the fact remains that 90%+ of child sex abuse occurs within the family. that is not an excuse for predators but rather to try and inform you on what is the REAL state of child abuse. While you love to accuse me of being soft on pedo rings I would point out that your post seems rather SOFT on in-family sex abuse.

The Freemason family?

Back to top

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Prince Andrew a pedo?
Reply #76 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:41pm

Svengali wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:40pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:30pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 11:52am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 10:49am:

and you are right. I believe the figure is around 90% of abuse occurs within the family. so the important thing then of course is to concentrate on outsiders and strangers because that makes so much sense.

people are so stupid.

People are not so stupid.

Child sexual abuse victims at the hands of relatives is a whole different ball game. Because most of the perpetrators can't be nailed doesn't mean the high profile pedophiles should get away with their pedophile syndicates, does it?

Children are threatened not to tell by dear old Uncle Albert, whereas the children used in pedophile rings are meticulously selected and sometimes groomed to be the play things of the rich and famous.

With family abuse it's usually one person and one child, whereas the child is abused by many different people within the pedo ring.

The police have to rely on the victim or a family member coming forward before they can make enquiries, whereas it's usually loose mouths or rumours floating around that sinks someone within the pedo ring, then it's just a matter of time before they're all named, or a couple of victims come forward as in the Savile and Harris cases.

im not sure what your point is. the fact remains that 90%+ of child sex abuse occurs within the family. that is not an excuse for predators but rather to try and inform you on what is the REAL state of child abuse. While you love to accuse me of being soft on pedo rings I would point out that your post seems rather SOFT on in-family sex abuse.

The Freemason family?

no twit... it is the Alien Reptilian family. At least try and keep you insanity consistent.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Svengali

Gold Member

Offline

Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male

Re: Prince Andrew a pedo?
Reply #77 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:46pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:41pm:

Svengali wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:40pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:30pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 11:52am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 10:49am:

and you are right. I believe the figure is around 90% of abuse occurs within the family. so the important thing then of course is to concentrate on outsiders and strangers because that makes so much sense.

people are so stupid.

People are not so stupid.

Child sexual abuse victims at the hands of relatives is a whole different ball game. Because most of the perpetrators can't be nailed doesn't mean the high profile pedophiles should get away with their pedophile syndicates, does it?

Children are threatened not to tell by dear old Uncle Albert, whereas the children used in pedophile rings are meticulously selected and sometimes groomed to be the play things of the rich and famous.

With family abuse it's usually one person and one child, whereas the child is abused by many different people within the pedo ring.

The police have to rely on the victim or a family member coming forward before they can make enquiries, whereas it's usually loose mouths or rumours floating around that sinks someone within the pedo ring, then it's just a matter of time before they're all named, or a couple of victims come forward as in the Savile and Harris cases.

im not sure what your point is. the fact remains that 90%+ of child sex abuse occurs within the family. that is not an excuse for predators but rather to try and inform you on what is the REAL state of child abuse. While you love to accuse me of being soft on pedo rings I would point out that your post seems rather SOFT on in-family sex abuse.

The Freemason family?

no twit... it is the Alien Reptilian family. At least try and keep you insanity consistent.

Your forebears? Your slithering is not an attractive genetic trait.

Back to top

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 106219
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Prince Andrew a pedo?
Reply #78 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:46pm

Svengali wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:40pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:30pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 11:52am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 10:49am:

and you are right. I believe the figure is around 90% of abuse occurs within the family. so the important thing then of course is to concentrate on outsiders and strangers because that makes so much sense.

people are so stupid.

People are not so stupid.

Child sexual abuse victims at the hands of relatives is a whole different ball game. Because most of the perpetrators can't be nailed doesn't mean the high profile pedophiles should get away with their pedophile syndicates, does it?

Children are threatened not to tell by dear old Uncle Albert, whereas the children used in pedophile rings are meticulously selected and sometimes groomed to be the play things of the rich and famous.

With family abuse it's usually one person and one child, whereas the child is abused by many different people within the pedo ring.

The police have to rely on the victim or a family member coming forward before they can make enquiries, whereas it's usually loose mouths or rumours floating around that sinks someone within the pedo ring, then it's just a matter of time before they're all named, or a couple of victims come forward as in the Savile and Harris cases.

im not sure what your point is. the fact remains that 90%+ of child sex abuse occurs within the family. that is not an excuse for predators but rather to try and inform you on what is the REAL state of child abuse. While you love to accuse me of being soft on pedo rings I would point out that your post seems rather SOFT on in-family sex abuse.

The Freemason family?

Careful - certain members here could be Freemasons -

especially those who apologise for their behaviour.

Back to top

IP Logged

Ex Dame Pansi

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 24168

Re: Prince Andrew a pedo?
Reply #79 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 1:54pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 10:49am:

im not sure what your point is. the fact remains that 90%+ of child sex abuse occurs within the family. that is not an excuse for predators but rather to try and inform you on what is the REAL state of child abuse. While you love to accuse me of being soft on pedo rings I would point out that your post seems rather SOFT on in-family sex abuse.

You do like to get away the crux of the issue longy. I am or have never been soft on child abuse, whether it's done by a prime minister, a pope, daddy or uncle Albert.

This thread is not about child sex abuse in general, it's more confined to high profile pedo rings that may or may not have Prince Andrew, 4th in line to the British throne as an active member.

I hope that Andrew is called to give evidence at the court hearing in the US, but I very much doubt it. He really does need to explain why he continued his relationship with the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein after he was released from prison.

Back to top

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....

IP Logged

Svengali

Gold Member

Offline

Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male

Re: Prince Andrew a pedo?
Reply #80 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 1:56pm

Bobby. wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:46pm:

Svengali wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:40pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 12:30pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 11:52am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 10:49am:

and you are right. I believe the figure is around 90% of abuse occurs within the family. so the important thing then of course is to concentrate on outsiders and strangers because that makes so much sense.

people are so stupid.

People are not so stupid.

Child sexual abuse victims at the hands of relatives is a whole different ball game. Because most of the perpetrators can't be nailed doesn't mean the high profile pedophiles should get away with their pedophile syndicates, does it?

Children are threatened not to tell by dear old Uncle Albert, whereas the children used in pedophile rings are meticulously selected and sometimes groomed to be the play things of the rich and famous.

With family abuse it's usually one person and one child, whereas the child is abused by many different people within the pedo ring.

The police have to rely on the victim or a family member coming forward before they can make enquiries, whereas it's usually loose mouths or rumours floating around that sinks someone within the pedo ring, then it's just a matter of time before they're all named, or a couple of victims come forward as in the Savile and Harris cases.

im not sure what your point is. the fact remains that 90%+ of child sex abuse occurs within the family. that is not an excuse for predators but rather to try and inform you on what is the REAL state of child abuse. While you love to accuse me of being soft on pedo rings I would point out that your post seems rather SOFT on in-family sex abuse.

The Freemason family?

Careful - certain members here could be Freemasons -

especially those who apologise for their behaviour.

The Freemasons need to apologize from the dock as the defendant.

Back to top

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian

IP Logged

UnSubRocky Gold Member Offline Crocodile Hunter: Origins Posts: 25018 Rockhampton Gender:	Re: Prince Andrew a pedo? Reply #81 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 2:03pm Having sex with a 17 year old is not pedophilia. The girl would have to be 4 years younger before allegations of that would come forward. It's just considered immoral if there was a large age gap between the 17 year old and the person with whom she has sex.
Back to top	At this stage... IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Prince Andrew a pedo?
Reply #82 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 2:04pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 1:54pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 10:49am:

im not sure what your point is. the fact remains that 90%+ of child sex abuse occurs within the family. that is not an excuse for predators but rather to try and inform you on what is the REAL state of child abuse. While you love to accuse me of being soft on pedo rings I would point out that your post seems rather SOFT on in-family sex abuse.

You do like to get away the crux of the issue longy. I am or have never been soft on child abuse, whether it's done by a prime minister, a pope, daddy or uncle Albert.

This thread is not about child sex abuse in general, it's more confined to high profile pedo rings that may or may not have Prince Andrew, 4th in line to the British throne as an active member.

I hope that Andrew is called to give evidence at the court hearing in the US, but I very much doubt it. He really does need to explain why he continued his relationship with the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein after he was released from prison.

no one is supporting pedo ring but it is equally true that having sex with a 17yo is not a pedo act in almost every country in the world - including ours. its hardly moral either but it is not pedo. I have no doubt there are extensive pedo rings in UK as the evidence is tending to suggest. But that does not change the fact that the most extensive child sexual abuse occurs in the home. Just because it isnt a 'ring' does not diminish the effect.

The entertainment industry is certainly coming for a hammering on this issue. Ultimately we might all realise that NO ONE is immune from this and that it is in fact part of the human condition, evil though it many be and not bounded by age, gender religion, race or social position.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: Prince Andrew a pedo?
Reply #83 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 2:39pm

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-been-secretly-filmed-4915421

Prince Andrew may have been secretly filmed with underage girl he is alleged to have abused
Jan 03, 2015 23:00 By Matthew Drake

Papers filed against his pervert pal Jeffrey Epstein say he recorded VIP orgies he threw at his luxury homes using cameras hidden in the walls

Prince Andrew’s tycoon pal may have taken compromising photos of him with the underage girl he is alleged to have abused.

Details buried in original court papers filed against pervert Jeffrey Epstein, 61, reveal that he recorded the sordid orgies he threw for VIPs at his luxury homes using cameras hidden in the walls of guest bedrooms.

The woman known as Jane Doe 3 – said to be 30-year-old Virginia Roberts – claims she was held as a sex slave and forced to sleep with the Duke of York in London, New York and the US Virgin Islands.

She says she was 17 at the time – under the age of consent in Florida.

One of the sexual encounters with the Prince, 54, is alleged to have taken place at an orgy involving other underage girls on Epstein’s private island.

The financier, who was jailed for 18 months in 2008 after pleading guilty to solicitation for prostitution, kept a sickening stash of images on a computer seized at his Palm Beach mansion in 2006.

Secret filming? Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach mansion in Florida
Prince Andrew was a frequent guest at the house.

Lawyers representing Roberts, originally referred to as Jane Doe 102, mentioned the hidden cameras in a 27-page filing at the Palm Beach Federal Courthouse in Florida.

The six-year-old papers, seen by the Sunday People, state: “Some of the photographs in the defendant’s possession were taken with hidden cameras set up in [Epstein’s] home in Palm Beach.

“On the Day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and photographs of underage girls on a computer in the defendant’s home.

“[He] may have taken lewd photographs of Jane Doe 102 with his hidden cameras and transported [them] to his other residences and elsewhere.”

There is no suggestion that Prince Andrew knew Roberts was being held as a sex slave by the tycoon and she claims she first met the royal when the financier took her to Europe and North Africa in 2001.

During a stop in London they called on his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of crooked media mogul Robert Maxwell.

Meeting: Virginia Roberts with Prince Andrew
Roberts claims in the latest court documents, filed on December 30, that she first slept with the prince at Maxwell’s home.

Court papers also allege that Maxwell presented nude pictures of her she had taken herself to Epstein as a birthday present.

They add that Roberts’ claims that she was forced to tell Epstein all about her sexual encounters so he could use the information to “blackmail” the royal.

She further claims she was sex-trafficked to “many other powerful men, including numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well known Prime Minister, and other world leaders”.

Prosecutors believe Epstein, who enjoyed watching other people have sex, had cameras fitted at his other residences across the world.

Prince Andrew – who was photographed with Roberts during a party in New York – was holed up in a luxury ski chalet in Switzerland on Saturday.

Old pals: Prince Andrew and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein
Buckingham Palace repeated his strongly-worded denial of the allegations.

Prince Andrew holidayed with Epstein in Thailand in 2001 and was snapped surrounded by topless women on a yacht.

A handyman who spent 11 years working for the tycoon claimed Prince Andrew often had massages when he was a guest at his Palm Beach mansion.

Juan Alessi said the Prince enjoyed daily massages from young women and often emerged “smiling” after rub-downs.

He said the massages were carried out in a private part of the mansion only Epstein and selected guests could access.

Alessi also told how he witnessed parties at the waterfront mansion at which the Prince was present while young girls frolicked in the nude.

Despite his friend’s 2008 conviction for child sex offences, Prince Andrew continued to see him and the pair were pictured together in Central Park, New York.

The ensuing furore led to him quitting his role as Britain’s trade envoy.

Connected: Jeffrey Epstein is a registered sex offender but still a friend of the rich and powerful

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: Prince Andrew a pedo?
Reply #84 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 2:41pm

Prince holes up in luxury ski resort
Prince Andrew was holed up in a luxury Swiss ski chalet tonight as the sex abuse claim hit the headlines worldwide.

He did not leave the holiday home in the posh village of Verbier, where he is on a family holiday with ex-wife Fergie and their daughters Beatrice and Eugenie.

On every other day of the New Year break he left either to ski on Verbier’s famous slopes or dine at the resort’s restaurants.

Some reports suggested Andrew may be preparing to fly back to the UK today.

Eugenie, 24, and her friend Cressida Bonas, 25, were seen at the chalet on Saturday afternoon.

Eugenie’s sister Beatrice, 26, was in Verbier earlier last week but by yesterday had left for a break in the Caribbean.

Singer Pixie Lott, 23, is also in the resort and celebrated New Year at the exclusive Farinet hotel.

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 106219
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Prince Andrew a pedo?
Reply #85 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 2:44pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 2:41pm:

Prince holes up in luxury ski resort
Prince Andrew was holed up in a luxury Swiss ski chalet tonight as the sex abuse claim hit the headlines worldwide.

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-17-...

He did not leave the holiday home in the posh village of Verbier, where he is on a family holiday with ex-wife Fergie and their daughters Beatrice and Eugenie.

On every other day of the New Year break he left either to ski on Verbier’s famous slopes or dine at the resort’s restaurants.

Some reports suggested Andrew may be preparing to fly back to the UK today.

Eugenie, 24, and her friend Cressida Bonas, 25, were seen at the chalet on Saturday afternoon.

Eugenie’s sister Beatrice, 26, was in Verbier earlier last week but by yesterday had left for a break in the Caribbean.

Singer Pixie Lott, 23, is also in the resort and celebrated New Year at the exclusive Farinet hotel.

Dear master Light,
this is the End Times when all will be revealed

as it is right now

Matthew 10

[26]
Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered,
that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.

Back to top

IP Logged

it_is_the_light Gold Member Offline Christ Light Posts: 41434 The Pyramid of LIGHT Gender:	Re: Prince Andrew a pedo? Reply #86 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 2:47pm
Back to top	ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ IP Logged

it_is_the_light Gold Member Offline Christ Light Posts: 41434 The Pyramid of LIGHT Gender:	Re: Prince Andrew a pedo? Reply #87 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 2:51pm 3 "sirs" here royal knights as it were
Back to top	ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ IP Logged

it_is_the_light Gold Member Offline Christ Light Posts: 41434 The Pyramid of LIGHT Gender:	Re: Prince Andrew a pedo? Reply #88 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 2:53pm jimmy page and jimmy savvile ... both adepts of crowley peadophilia is a pre requisite
Back to top	ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 106219 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Prince Andrew a pedo? Reply #89 - Jan 4^th, 2015 at 2:56pm it_is_the_light wrote on Jan 4^th, 2015 at 2:53pm: jimmy page and jimmy savvile ... both adepts of crowley peadophilia is a pre requisite http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/multimedia/archive/00346/4389989__346461c.jpg A photo of being near someone is not evidence of pedophilia. forgiven namaste
Back to top	IP Logged