Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
UKIP's Nigel Farage telling it like it is ... (Read 351 times)
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
UKIP's Nigel Farage telling it like it is ...
Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:34pm
 
... and getting a belting for breaking rank with political correctness and Coward Politics.

"He told Channel 4 News: 'There is a very strong argument that says that what happened in Paris today is a result - (and we've seen it in London too) - is a result I'm afraid of now having a fifth column living within these countries.

We've got people living in these countries, holding our passports, who hate us".


Correct.

And then the limp-wristed UK prime minister steps in to bitch-slap Nigel Farage for stating the obvious:

David Cameron says it is wrong to use attack to make political argument.

Quite to the contrary. It was a 'Wake Up' call that only the UKIP leader dared to respond to with honesty and integrity.

Farage again...

Farage railed against the 'really rather gross policy of multiculturalism'


link

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Quantum
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3373
Re: UKIP's Nigel Farage telling it like it is ...
Reply #1 - Jan 9th, 2015 at 1:30pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 12:34pm:
... and getting a belting for breaking rank with political correctness and Coward Politics.

"He told Channel 4 News: 'There is a very strong argument that says that what happened in Paris today is a result - (and we've seen it in London too) - is a result I'm afraid of now having a fifth column living within these countries.

We've got people living in these countries, holding our passports, who hate us".


Correct.

And then the limp-wristed UK prime minister steps in to bitch-slap Nigel Farage for stating the obvious:

David Cameron says it is wrong to use attack to make political argument.

Quite to the contrary. It was a 'Wake Up' call that only the UKIP leader dared to respond to with honesty and integrity.

Farage again...

Farage railed against the 'really rather gross policy of multiculturalism'


link



As always the Orwellian mind of these leaders comes out.

The only person making it political is Cameron. Farage is pointing out an issue that needs to be dealt with. If he said cameron is responsible so vote for me then he would be making it political. But as it is we see Cameron as the one using false outrage to throw dirt at Farage thereby bringing politics into it. Same routine all the time against anyone not agreeing with the script.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Soren
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 25654
Gender: male
Re: UKIP's Nigel Farage telling it like it is ...
Reply #2 - Jan 9th, 2015 at 2:14pm
 
Quantum wrote on Jan 9th, 2015 at 1:30pm:
As always the Orwellian mind of these leaders comes out.

The only person making it political is Cameron. Farage is pointing out an issue that needs to be dealt with. If he said cameron is responsible so vote for me then he would be making it political. But as it is we see Cameron as the one using false outrage to throw dirt at Farage thereby bringing politics into it. Same routine all the time against anyone not agreeing with the script.



Lessons in NewSpeak

RIGHT-WING: Baddie. Vladimir Putin, a lifelong KGB man who regrets the break-up of the USSR, is invading neighboring countries. This is a bad thing, so he must be “right-wing.” The mullahs in Iran abolished the monarchy, nationalized industry, and drove most of the middle classes into exile. But they’re also nasty, so they, too, must be “right-wing.” A crazed gunman goes into a school and . . . oh, you get the picture.

DIVERSITY: People who look different but think the same way. Diversity applies to race, sex, disability, and sexual orientation. It emphatically does not apply to opinion. Indeed, when it comes to political views, it has taken on more or less the opposite of its Oldspeak meaning.

DISCRIMINATION: Being unpleasant to women or black people. Literally, of course, discrimination simply means discernment. It is something we practice every time we decide between alternatives. But its political undertones have spilled over into every usage of the word, so that discrimination, in any context, becomes discreditable. A firm that discriminates in favor of properly qualified applicants, or a university that insists on good exam results, cannot wholly escape the sense that it is doing something shameful.

XENOPHOBIA: Opposition to the European Union. By a curious inversion, you demonstrate your broadmindedness by continuing to support the Brussels racket, however illiberal or undemocratic it becomes, but condemn yourself as a bigot if you value the independence of other countries. Xenophobia (or “Europhobia”) has nothing to do with whether you feel comfortable with other cultures. Neil Kinnock, a former European Commissioner, has helpfully explained that skeptics don’t stop being xenophobes “just because they happen to speak fluent Catalan or whatever.” The only way to escape the charge is to proclaim your support for the Brussels institutions.

PREJUDICE: Hating other people. In its literal sense, prejudice simply means pre-judging a new situation on the basis of past experience. If you see an expensively dressed man, your prejudice tells you that he is likely to be well off. If a politician rings your doorbell, your prejudice tells you that he is probably after your vote. As Edmund Burke argued in his Reflections, life would become intolerable if we had to think everything through from first principles. But the anathematization of the word also touches its original meaning. If your common sense tells you that longer sentences would cut crime, or that there is a limit to how much immigration a country can absorb, it’s because you are prejudiced.

FREE SPEECH: Support for racists. We have been told so often that “free speech can never be used as an excuse for racism” that the two things have become conflated in our minds. Arguing for the first automatically opens you to the accusation of supporting the second. If you think that I exaggerate, cast your mind back to the case of the pensioner in Liverpool who was charged with “racially aggravated criminal damage” after scrawling “Free speech for England” on a condemned wall.

CONSERVATIVE: Neanderthal. Like “right-wing” (q.v.), but with the added bonus that it can be applied to both sides in the same conflict. Islamist “conservatives” want to impose headscarves while Western “conservatives” want to ban them. Hardline Israeli settlers and hardline Hamas terrorists are both “conservatives.” And so on.

http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/A-lesson-in-Newspeak-8050
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print