|dev|null wrote on Jan 30
th, 2015 at 2:04pm:
Soren wrote on Jan 30
th, 2015 at 1:43pm:
|dev|null wrote on Jan 30
th, 2015 at 1:16pm:
Soren wrote on Jan 30
th, 2015 at 12:58pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 27
th, 2015 at 10:07pm:
Basically Soren, if you dismiss the scholarship - as you seem to want to do here - then I'm afraid you have pledged yourself firmly into the "islam nuffin to do wiv nuffin' camp. How ironic eh? Otherwise, if you insist its all down to islam, then you either concede that terrorists don't follow islam, or you be a hypocrite and cite only one side of the story - like all the hypocrites here.
The scholarship is entirely about the interpretation of the Koran, treated as the final, unalterable revelation of an unknowable god.
How can you have a revelation about something that is "unknowable"?
Excellent point. Yet that's what Muslims believe.
It's also what the Christians claim about their God.
Yet you only ever point out the contradictions in Islam Soren.
I wonder why? because it suits their argument....
they forget its all about interpretation..doesnt matter what book you read it was supposedly written many moons ago...in a language no one understands now...
oh thats right.. the experts think they do..
we all interpret as it suits us to live our lives....
I dont go to church unless I have too but I still consider myself a good person and living life to the best of my ability without hurting anyone else...
in the mean time I see so many contradictions of what was written in a time that no one in this world can possibly imagine.....
if we read a book written even 50 years ago...about the times then.. even if we lived them we find it hard to believe thats how it was thats how the rules/laws were in those times...
even the interpretations of the good books....has changed from those of 50 years ago..
we never even knew about Islam 50 years ago....now its all some talk about.