Australian Politics Forum - we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(

Phemanderac

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3507
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #105 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 6:41am

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 6:37am:

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 5:58am:

The only stand out from this Bolt escapade is that he is, as usual, coming at it from the wrong end.

The "fall out" from this mindless slaughter...

Right from the beginning you make a grave error in referring to these well-considered executions as 'mindless slaughter'. You've been reading too many cheap tabloids.

Start to think for yourself.

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 5:58am:

... by a couple of Muslim fanatics ...

Again, you're helping Islam avoid accountability for what happened.

'Fanatics' can correctly read as 'devout Muslims who take their religion seriously'. Just because the majority of Muslims are remiss in adhering strictly to the teachings of the Koran does not mean that those who do are therefore 'fanatics'.

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 5:58am:

On the other hand though, it is nice to see Mr Bolt doing some hand wringing over the murder of some left wing cartoonists.

It was a Leftwing journal in as much as it pilloried anything they perceived to be 'rightwing' and 'fascist' - in this case, and very correctly - just ordinary non-extremist Islam. The Islam of the Great Majority ... ie. don't depict the prophet in imagery.

Needless to say, what happened to these cartoonists was utterly predictable, of course, and no surprise to any one.

They even had a couple of totally useless token police officers stationed outside the offices. And the experience of Denmark was a 'Don't Swim in these Dangerous Waters' beach sign that they stupidly ignored and for which they paid the ultimate penalty.

'Je Suis Charlie' is a confession of utter stupidity in a world under siege from activist devout Muslims.

Actually, one of the Police officers who was murdered in cold blood was a devout and practicing Muslim - you see that is what ignorant hate does, these scum killed their own....

Funny, I didn't see you predicting it by the by.

Back to top

On the 26th of January you are all invited to celebrate little white penal day...

"They're not rules as such, more like guidelines" Pirates of the Caribbean..

IP Logged

Phemanderac

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3507
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #106 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 6:41am

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 6:37am:

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 5:58am:

The only stand out from this Bolt escapade is that he is, as usual, coming at it from the wrong end.

The "fall out" from this mindless slaughter...

Right from the beginning you make a grave error in referring to these well-considered executions as 'mindless slaughter'. You've been reading too many cheap tabloids.

Start to think for yourself.

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 5:58am:

... by a couple of Muslim fanatics ...

Again, you're helping Islam avoid accountability for what happened.

'Fanatics' can correctly read as 'devout Muslims who take their religion seriously'. Just because the majority of Muslims are remiss in adhering strictly to the teachings of the Koran does not mean that those who do are therefore 'fanatics'.

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 5:58am:

On the other hand though, it is nice to see Mr Bolt doing some hand wringing over the murder of some left wing cartoonists.

It was a Leftwing journal in as much as it pilloried anything they perceived to be 'rightwing' and 'fascist' - in this case, and very correctly - just ordinary non-extremist Islam. The Islam of the Great Majority ... ie. don't depict the prophet in imagery.

Needless to say, what happened to these cartoonists was utterly predictable, of course, and no surprise to any one.

They even had a couple of totally useless token police officers stationed outside the offices. And the experience of Denmark was a 'Don't Swim in these Dangerous Waters' beach sign that they stupidly ignored and for which they paid the ultimate penalty.

'Je Suis Charlie' is a confession of utter stupidity in a world under siege from activist devout Muslims.

Actually, one of the Police officers who was murdered in cold blood was a devout and practicing Muslim - you see that is what ignorant hate does, these scum killed their own....

Funny, I didn't see you predicting it by the by.

Back to top

On the 26th of January you are all invited to celebrate little white penal day...

"They're not rules as such, more like guidelines" Pirates of the Caribbean..

IP Logged

Phemanderac Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3507 Gender:	Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:( Reply #107 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 6:41am Turn the page please....
Back to top	On the 26th of January you are all invited to celebrate little white penal day... "They're not rules as such, more like guidelines" Pirates of the Caribbean.. IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 29898
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #108 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 6:43am

Yeah OK that's your observation.

So tell me all the Muslims that live in the "no go areas/muslim ghettos" in Paris .... what sort of Muslims are these?

I've missed putting this reply in the right spot .... never mind.

As for one of the Police Officers being Muslim & these scum killing their own ............

so are IS supporters in Syria .............& there has always been conflict between different Muslim sects.

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #109 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 6:53am

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 6:41am:

Actually, one of the Police officers who was murdered in cold blood was a devout and practicing Muslim -

I was the first to mention this a couple of days ago.

Phemanderac wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 6:41am:

you see that is what ignorant hate does, these scum killed their own....

No they didn't.

They killed a traitor to Mohammad their prophet. That policeman stood there, gun-in-hand, protecting a building full of Infidels who were disrespecting the Prophet through cartoons, lampooning, and sarcastic satire.

Just ask gandalf.

The lapsed Muslims were not the gunmen, but the Muslim policeman they shot.

And still, you will notice, the terrorists are very careful to leave western politicians alone.

Firstly, they recognise the fact that western politicians are the main facilitators and sponsors of Muslim immigration and refugees influx for building up an archipelago of mini-caliphates throughout the western nations, and then secondly, it's western politicians who have been instrumental in ramping up vilification laws to prevent criticism of Islam.

And thirdly, killing a politician and thus making the rest of them paranoid with fear for their own safety would serve only to make western governments a lot less 'liberal-progressive' in their attitude towards the annual influx of Muslims.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jan 13^th, 2015 at 7:10am by Lord Herbert »

IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #110 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 7:20am

And here's an example of why western politicians are not targeted by activist Muslims.

Abbott and his 'Rightwing fascist' government are happy to play protector and host to Muslim terrorists who use their tongues instead of AK49s to get their message across.

Is this imbecile really what we need to defend this country against the incursions of Muslims?

Hardly.

He's practicing for his next meeting with Australia's Muslim Ghetto Community Leadership.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #111 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 2:47pm

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:57pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:08pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 7:41pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 7:29pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 7:14pm:

[
Oh, and this is about the very essence of 'freedom of speech'...

no its not. If it was then all the internet heroes sounding off here would be doing it in public.

No it's about the magazine having the 'freedom of speech' to publish something that some people might disagree with...

thats not what the magazine did, try again.

No?? what did they do then, (apart from publishing cartoons that offended Muslims)????

better, nearly got it. They deliberately set out to offend Muslims by publishing the most offensive caricatures they could about Islam. Methinks there is an agenda, but then Im not as smart as you gizmo.

garbage. by general standards of 'offensive' they were exceedingly lame. And no, you are NOT as smart as gizmo.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #112 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 2:48pm

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 9:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:34pm:

[

Oh I think pretty much everyone other than Pansi thinks you are an angry poster.

you appear to be quite an angry poster yourself, when challenged on anything your first resort is to personal abuse, every single time. Has to be something in your background to explain that, overbearing Mother perhaps?

I have a low tolerance to stupidity. And you exude so much some times.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38843
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #113 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 3:08pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 2:48pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 9:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:34pm:

[

Oh I think pretty much everyone other than Pansi thinks you are an angry poster.

you appear to be quite an angry poster yourself, when challenged on anything your first resort is to personal abuse, every single time. Has to be something in your background to explain that, overbearing Mother perhaps?

I have a low tolerance to stupidity. And you exude so much some times.

Must be bloody hard, living with yourself.

Back to top

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #114 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 3:20pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 2:47pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:57pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:08pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 7:41pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 7:29pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 7:14pm:

[
Oh, and this is about the very essence of 'freedom of speech'...

no its not. If it was then all the internet heroes sounding off here would be doing it in public.

No it's about the magazine having the 'freedom of speech' to publish something that some people might disagree with...

thats not what the magazine did, try again.

No?? what did they do then, (apart from publishing cartoons that offended Muslims)????

better, nearly got it. They deliberately set out to offend Muslims by publishing the most offensive caricatures they could about Islam. Methinks there is an agenda, but then Im not as smart as you gizmo.

garbage. by general standards of 'offensive' they were exceedingly lame. And no, you are NOT as smart as gizmo.

lol, you havent seen the cartoons have you? I can read you like a book. Go and have a look then come back and discuss.

Back to top

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #115 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 3:21pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 2:48pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 9:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:34pm:

[

Oh I think pretty much everyone other than Pansi thinks you are an angry poster.

you appear to be quite an angry poster yourself, when challenged on anything your first resort is to personal abuse, every single time. Has to be something in your background to explain that, overbearing Mother perhaps?

I have a low tolerance to stupidity. And you exude so much some times.

must hurt like hell to look in the mirror in the morning.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139151
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #116 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 3:25pm

ian wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 3:21pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 2:48pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 9:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:34pm:

[

Oh I think pretty much everyone other than Pansi thinks you are an angry poster.

you appear to be quite an angry poster yourself, when challenged on anything your first resort is to personal abuse, every single time. Has to be something in your background to explain that, overbearing Mother perhaps?

I have a low tolerance to stupidity. And you exude so much some times.

must hurt like hell to look in the mirror in the morning.

Quote:

Must be bloody hard, living with yourself.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #117 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 3:33pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 2:48pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 9:03pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:34pm:

[

Oh I think pretty much everyone other than Pansi thinks you are an angry poster.

you appear to be quite an angry poster yourself, when challenged on anything your first resort is to personal abuse, every single time. Has to be something in your background to explain that, overbearing Mother perhaps?

I have a low tolerance to stupidity. And you exude so much some times.

go copper internet: what will china build I wonder? Shocked

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Ex Dame Pansi Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 24168	Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:( Reply #118 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 4:23pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 2:48pm: I have a low tolerance to stupidity.
Back to top	"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up..... IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #119 - Jan 13^th, 2015 at 4:40pm

ian wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 3:20pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 13^th, 2015 at 2:47pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:57pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:08pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 7:41pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 7:29pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 7:14pm:

[
Oh, and this is about the very essence of 'freedom of speech'...

no its not. If it was then all the internet heroes sounding off here would be doing it in public.

No it's about the magazine having the 'freedom of speech' to publish something that some people might disagree with...

thats not what the magazine did, try again.

No?? what did they do then, (apart from publishing cartoons that offended Muslims)????

better, nearly got it. They deliberately set out to offend Muslims by publishing the most offensive caricatures they could about Islam. Methinks there is an agenda, but then Im not as smart as you gizmo.

garbage. by general standards of 'offensive' they were exceedingly lame. And no, you are NOT as smart as gizmo.

lol, you havent seen the cartoons have you? I can read you like a book. Go and have a look then come back and discuss.

it actually doesn't matter. after what they did, the cover could have Mohammed screwing a pig and it would still be lame.

you are quite the apologist for islam at the moment and actually defending this action.

Must be hell in that head of yours.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged