Australian Politics Forum - we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #45 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 2:36pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 1:50pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 1:47pm:

red baron wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 9:06am:

Just a point here...When Monty Python came out and satirised Christ , did the Christian World rise up and destroy the BBC?

I don't so Tim

So? I have an aquaintance whom is seriously overweight, I dont disparage fat people or make jokes about his weight, thats because I know he doesnt like it and I respect it. I dont see this issue any differently. Muslims find caricatures of their prophet extremely disrespectful, the French journalists involved were deliberately provocative in my opinion.

oh yes ...

what about the police that killed dawson ..

were they provocative ?

namaste

There go those voices in your head again. schitzophrenic medication has evolved you know, ask your Doctor.

Back to top

IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #46 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 2:42pm

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 2:36pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 1:50pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 1:47pm:

red baron wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 9:06am:

Just a point here...When Monty Python came out and satirised Christ , did the Christian World rise up and destroy the BBC?

I don't so Tim

So? I have an aquaintance whom is seriously overweight, I dont disparage fat people or make jokes about his weight, thats because I know he doesnt like it and I respect it. I dont see this issue any differently. Muslims find caricatures of their prophet extremely disrespectful, the French journalists involved were deliberately provocative in my opinion.

oh yes ...

what about the police that killed dawson ..

were they provocative ?

namaste

There go those voices in your head again. schitzophrenic medication has evolved you know, ask your Doctor.

many blessings

I am my own doctor and have diagnosed the self

to be of sound mind and body .. ie : sane

so there is validated proof of sanity

further one such as I am

does not take any drugs or vaccines

for these are poison for the temple ,

your physical garment,

the body you reside within

namaste

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jan 12^th, 2015 at 4:51pm by it_is_the_light »

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #47 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 2:43pm

Sophia wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 2:31pm:

ian wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 1:47pm:

red baron wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 9:06am:

Just a point here...When Monty Python came out and satirised Christ , did the Christian World rise up and destroy the BBC?

I don't so Tim

So? I have an aquaintance whom is seriously overweight, I dont disparage fat people or make jokes about his weight, thats because I know he doesnt like it and I respect it. I dont see this issue any differently. Muslims find caricatures of their prophet extremely disrespectful, the French journalists involved were deliberately provocative in my opinion.

It reminds me of the comedian, Dave Allen (remember him, with the missing finger and glass of whiskey?) He always joked about Catholics. In fact, all religions get some jokes, but over sensitive zealots like that lot that go on a killing spree....they haven't learnt to acquire a good sense of humour.
Sad ole world with no humour.
And there is no higher than thou....yet killing for an imagined higher entity is such bs and not a reason, but an excuse for taking out their radicalness on.
Fear is their weapon, to instill fear, not humour, not acceptance of differences etc.

of course the Muslim nutters involved have no humour and are zealots. But thats not the point. You reap what you sow, the journalists involved knew they were being deeply offensive to Muslims and deliberately decided to keep on doing so. I dont think thats 'courageous" , sounds like they had an agenda. This isnt about freedom of speech.

Back to top

IP Logged

red baron

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 10204
Blue Mountains
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #48 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 2:54pm

Of course it's about Freedom of Speech. You are right Ian in that the Journalists were being intensely provocative and should have known that the radical Muslims would come at some stage. I guess that why 2 Gendarmes were stationed at the office.

It didn't them little good because 'the hit' was carried out in a manner that bespoke of military planning (the escape not so well planned).

I digress, the moment we start muzzling free speech because we are to afraid to speak out then we are f.....d!

Back to top

IP Logged

Ex Dame Pansi

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 24168

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #49 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 3:33pm

cods wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 9:08am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 8:26am:

Replace the word death with destruction (as I said) because I am not happy about you putting words in my mouth.

You are fully aware of the context in which I used the word.

destroy:

to render ineffective or useless; nullify; neutralize; invalidate.

to defeat completely.

if I tried to destroy the labor party????...

wouldnt I be causing the DEATH of something..

defeat/destroy... in the end there is nothing left....

to me, that spells death...which also means nothing left...

if you WIN an argument with someone you dont have to kill them

but if you destroy that person....thennnnnnnnnnnn

it can be construed....a different way.

Exactly cods. The destruction of something can mean its demise or death. You made it sound like I was wishing death to living people, which was not so.

The death of the Liberal Party and ISIL....glad we straightened that out.

Back to top

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Hendrix
andrei said: Great isn't it? Seeing boatloads of what is nothing more than human garbage turn up.....

IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #50 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 4:03pm

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 11^th, 2015 at 9:06pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 11^th, 2015 at 8:55pm:

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Jan 11^th, 2015 at 8:40pm:

i don't write in italic..

don't worry..

the coward FD will be along soon to close the thread as he's starting to do to others..

all talk..

but when push comes to shove he has a big YELLOW apologist stipe down his back like pekkary and co

Bolt talks all tough, but I'll bet, just like the rest of us would, he'd crap his pants if some arsehole walked into his office with a Kalashnikov. He'll be no pen pushing hero then.

I want my guns back John Winston Howard.

exactly right aussie..

these scum will pull a gun every time and blow your head off over a simple cartoon...

it's laughable if it wasn't so true...

we just don't need these maggots in our country... NOT ONE... if you "want" to be muslim then go to a fricken Muslim country and kill each other every other day of the week..

just don't bring it to my country.. f off... Angry

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #51 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 4:31pm

red baron wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

Of course it's about Freedom of Speech. You are right Ian in that the Journalists were being intensely provocative and should have known that the radical Muslims would come at some stage. I guess that why 2 Gendarmes were stationed at the office.

It didn't them little good because 'the hit' was carried out in a manner that bespoke of military planning (the escape not so well planned).

I digress, the moment we start muzzling free speech because we are to afraid to speak out then we are f.....d!

I view it a little differently, the moment we deliberately set out to provocate and offend those with different beleifs to ours we are fcked.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #52 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 4:34pm

red baron wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

Of course it's about Freedom of Speech. You are right Ian in that the Journalists were being intensely provocative and should have known that the radical Muslims would come at some stage.

I guess that why 2 Gendarmes were stationed at the office.

It didn't them little good because 'the hit' was carried out in a manner that bespoke of military planning (the escape not so well planned).

I digress, the moment we start muzzling free speech because we are to afraid to speak out then we are f.....d!

... what happened to them? Shocked

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

|dev|null

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4434
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #53 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 4:59pm

I am Lassana Bathily too.

These are Brave Muslims. One died defending the "Western values" which the Islamophobes claim are incompatible with Muslims. The other saved Jewish customers at the Kosher Supermarket, hardly the act of a raving Islamist anti-Semite.

Why are their efforts forgotten by the Islamophobes?

Perhaps because they don't fit the caricature they have created inside their peanut sized brains of what a Muslim is or could be? Grin

Back to top

"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013.

"we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions."
Freediver, 2007.

IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35016 Gender:	Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:( Reply #54 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 5:08pm hay light,what have you wandered into this thread for ? no mention of freemasons here.
Back to top	IP Logged

innocentbystander. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4723 Gender:	Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:( Reply #55 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 5:29pm That nice aboriginal man could very well be talking about himself
Back to top	IP Logged

\|dev\|null Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4434 Gender:	Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:( Reply #56 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 5:47pm Hello Matty.
Back to top	"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013. "we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions." Freediver, 2007. IP Logged

\|dev\|null Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4434 Gender:	Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:( Reply #57 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 5:55pm
Back to top	"Pens and books are the weapons that defeat terrorism." - Malala Yousefzai, 2013. "we will never ever solve violence while we grasp for overly simplistic solutions." Freediver, 2007. IP Logged

Rocketanski Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1335 Gender:	Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:( Reply #58 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 6:03pm The aborigines were on the mainland for 40 thousand years. The Earth is 5.5 billion years old. Who owned Australia for the 5 billion, 400 million and 460 thousand years before the Aborigines?
Back to top	IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: we are Charlie? .. BS cowards.. >:(
Reply #59 - Jan 12^th, 2015 at 6:09pm

Rocketanski wrote on Jan 12^th, 2015 at 6:03pm:

The aborigines were on the mainland for 40 thousand years. The Earth is 5.5 billion years old. Who owned Australia for the 5 billion, 400 million and 460 thousand years before the Aborigines?

many blessings to be correct

these are originals ... not ab original / ab normal

these are original natives .. not the legal linguistic ~

by definition is a sinister play on words to get the natives to admit they are not original therefore strengthening

the invaders terms and terminologies in ' law ' .

if any original being or native admits the are ' ab original ' then the collective law is against them from the quick ...

this is forgiven yet exposed ...

does this comfort unto thee ?

so be it

namaste

- : ) =

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged