ian wrote on Jan 15^th, 2015 at 6:45am:

No, its about radicalism and how to draw it out of its cave so that the enemy can be seen and named.

Radical Islam - The Islamic Perversion - will not stop at extreme reaction against 'blasphemy'...

And while Saudi Arabia continues to fund the Islamist agenda worldwide, you can expect continued expressions of extreme outrage from Islamists.

.

Quantum wrote on Jan 15^th, 2015 at 8:59pm:



no dear... they encouraged them to do what they said they would do..

the bees you see are the terrorists  its called analogy..

if they hadnt been TAUNTED maybe   just maybe  12 staff would still be catching the bus home....

if you TAUNT an angry beehive..

.any rational person would expect to get stung......they might if they were extremely bright understand they could be killed..


same thing with mad terrorists..

if you keep TAUNTING them ... they will sting you and even KILL you..

its what they do KILL..they have promised you....they will KILL you..

so you keep TAUNTING.......

it makes sense to you...

oh I see... you want INSTANT ANNIHILATION>..


you forget!!! how many bees are ther?????

do you know.?

..... NO ONE REALLY KNOWS its all guess work...

same applies to terrorists....

you forget blow up this beehive and there are many more where they came from...

same with terrorists

in fact.. they will be even angrier that you killed their beehive.. infact you have made many many more enemies..


thats all they needed  another reason to kill


and they know where you live.....because they dont care if your name is quantum...

all they care is they kill someone who is white and christian.. that will do them..

bees like terrorists.. dont care who they kill....

we are all one to them......

this is what you fail to grasp..

you think you can pick out one KING  bee the leader.. the one terrorists who calls the shots and thats it...the rest fall into line..


you wish..

but look I am so glad you are looking out for our bums... and will stand tall against any threats we have in this country.....even if it is over a cartoon....


and I dont mind you bagging me either if it makes you feel that kicking the beehive/terrorists is the BEST  way to go....

btw where do you live quantum

I know you are brave and will tell us...so when the angry bees read terrorists come we can send them your way... you know exactly how to deal with them

cods wrote on Jan 16^th, 2015 at 9:10am:


Thank you for stinging yourself in the foot. Your little disjointed rant did show one thing very clearly; you think that the terrorist are out there, they are crazy, that they want to kill, and they will do it anyway. So why all this BS over a cartoon? Cartoon or not, you believe the terrorist are out there and want to kill just because we are not one of them. So why do you think they need a cartoon to do this? If there was no cartoon it would just be something else. So what's the solution cods? Just turn the western world into an Islamic state so our ways don't offend them and give them an excuse to kill us?

I have asked this question so many times and you refuse to answer it. You refuse to answer it because once you do your entire hysterical rant it finished. But let's try it again once last time;

Where do you draw the line? What if they stopped the comic to keep the Muslims happy. What next? What happens if they ask for any books which are not pro Muslims to be banned. Do you ban them? What happens if they then ask for kids dolls to get band because they are made in human image. Do you ban them in the hope that they might not shoot up a toy shop? How far would you go cods until you said enough?

Now let's just assume that for you there is no limit. You would do everything the Muslims ask because you are too shlt scared of upsetting the beehive. They want everyone to speak Arabic, do it just incase they shoot us if we offend them with our own language. So if the path of appeasement is your solution, that of course leads us to the other question that you refuse to answer;

What about everyone else? if Buddhist want us to stop cartoons about them, do you stop? What about other religions? What about fringe political parties? What about corporations, companies and other organisations? Do we roll over for everyone who wants to be off limits in cartoons, or only those willing to shot us?

No more shlt beehive analogies. Just answer the questions straight. Do we keep rolling over for Islam one item at a time forever, and if so, do we do the same thing for every other group that wants its way?

buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 16^th, 2015 at 9:55am:


So what is the penalty for insulting Islam in Saudi Arabia, do they chop your head off, are the Saudis doing Islam wrong ?

Buzz and smoked J is your typical Islamic apologist, why does he leave the we decreed upon the children of Israel out of his quote with 5/32, that verse does not apply to muslims.

Quote:


I reckon 5/32 is taken out of context more than any other verse by Islamic apologists like Buzz,for some reason they always selectively quote that verse leaving out the we decreed upon the children of Israel.

Of course apologists like Buzz are silent about the death penalty for leaving Islam-
Quote:


The Saudi constitution says gods book (quran) and the sunnah of his prophet are the constitution, the sunnah says death for apostasy,this is what Buzz and the Greens support when they call people Islamophobes.

buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 16^th, 2015 at 9:55am:

And how does that verse start? What does the next verse say? How about the one after that? If you keep reading you will quickly see that this comment;

buzzanddidj wrote on Jan 16^th, 2015 at 9:55am:


Is completely ignorant and straight out wrong. They are doing exactly what a good Muslim should do; overpowering those who corrupt the earth and reject Allah.

Stop apologising for them. Stop quoting that verse out of context. Learn what Islam stands for and understand what actually guides these people.

cods wrote on Jan 16^th, 2015 at 10:29am:


Reading your replies is what is too hard. Do you not understand how to quote and format a post?

So let's get this straight, you draw the line at stopping cartoons. If Muslims want to ban TV you would say no, you only draw the line at cartoons. So if they go on a killing spree because we don't ban TV, let not anyone turn around and say "look, 10,000 killed. Was TV really worth it? Why did we kick the beehive?". No, that was ok to say no. We should draw the line were cods says to draw it.

This is a cracker as well. We should only ban things that people find offensive on this condition;

Quote:


That's the chicken shlt attitude everyone is arguing against you for cods. Roll over for a bully. Give them your lunch money today, give them your shoes tomorrow. Give them what they want because they threaten you. And you still don't get the WWII examples? You still think appeasing those who threaten you is the way to go? That's pathetic. That is seriously idiotic and spineless.