red baron wrote on Jan 15
th, 2015 at 7:35am:
Fred Nile on Sunrise this morning virtually accused the male survivors of the Martin Place siege of cowardice.
He claimed they ran and escaped when they should have stayed and protected the women.
He also said that the survivors should not receive bravery awards because 'they did not carry out a brave act' i.e. They did not place their lives at risk to save someone else.
Nile branded himself as a chivalrous male and believed that men should protect women.
We all know Fred is 'out there' but he does pose an interesting question - should the survivors receive bravery awards?
My opinion? No I don't believe they should,my heart goes out to them for the incredible drama they experienced but I think it would devalue bravery awards to give them to everyone who has undergone trauma.
Bravery awards should be reserved for those who sacrifice for others. Perhaps Tori would qualify.
red_baron,
I agree, with you.
Some people who receive 'Bravery awards' were simply lucky/fortunate.
And doling out Bravery awards [when it is not warranted], simply debases the 'value' or [rightful] prestige of the Bravery award itself, imo.
But if a person actually did something which demonstrated bravery and sacrifice, particularly on behalf of another person, then sure,
recognise that bravery and sacrifice, by awarding them a Bravery award.