Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 12
Send Topic Print
cheese eating surrender monkeys (Read 17353 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49193
At my desk.
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #15 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:02pm
 
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 2:35pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 2:22pm:
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:45pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:27pm:
So the terrorism is all our fault?

Tell me svengali, how far would you go to appease the terrorists?


The appropriate policy and principle is to avoid creating disaffected persons in the first place.

You obviously have not known any Muslims and not ventured out of Australia other than short trips. You are just a stooge and dupe of more powerful forces of hostility.


So you are more a fan of pre-appeasement? We must guess what will drive the Muslims into a mad rage and placate them before they do it?

Any suggestions on how?


No. What you are doing is incitement. You are inciting the lowest level of society into following your lead and indiscriminately being hostile to all Muslims.

Just demonstrates the shallowness of your morals.


Should my 'incitement' be censored?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Svengali
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #16 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:26pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:02pm:
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 2:35pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 2:22pm:
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:45pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:27pm:
So the terrorism is all our fault?

Tell me svengali, how far would you go to appease the terrorists?


The appropriate policy and principle is to avoid creating disaffected persons in the first place.

You obviously have not known any Muslims and not ventured out of Australia other than short trips. You are just a stooge and dupe of more powerful forces of hostility.


So you are more a fan of pre-appeasement? We must guess what will drive the Muslims into a mad rage and placate them before they do it?

Any suggestions on how?


No. What you are doing is incitement. You are inciting the lowest level of society into following your lead and indiscriminately being hostile to all Muslims.

Just demonstrates the shallowness of your morals.


Should my 'incitement' be censored?


I believe you should turn yourself in to your local police station and confess your extremist views and incitement attempts.
Back to top
 

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #17 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 4:51pm
 
many blessings and here is the minority stooge

and freemasonic magician young blood nazeem hussain

...

this freemasonic apologist is forgiven

namaste
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #18 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 4:53pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 2:17pm:
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:37pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:33pm:
Oh hi svengali. Fancy seeing you here. While I've got your attention, how far would you go in trying to appease terrorists? Do you support Charlie Hebdo's right to freedom of expression?


I don't support incitement. The magazine appears to have decided to focus its existence on ridiculing muslims.


So Charlie Hebdo is guilty of inciting violence?

I like Nazeem.


many blessings you like your bro mason nazeem ?

...

is nazeem in the same order as you freediver ?

namaste
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49193
At my desk.
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #19 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 5:00pm
 
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:26pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:02pm:
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 2:35pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 2:22pm:
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:45pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:27pm:
So the terrorism is all our fault?

Tell me svengali, how far would you go to appease the terrorists?


The appropriate policy and principle is to avoid creating disaffected persons in the first place.

You obviously have not known any Muslims and not ventured out of Australia other than short trips. You are just a stooge and dupe of more powerful forces of hostility.


So you are more a fan of pre-appeasement? We must guess what will drive the Muslims into a mad rage and placate them before they do it?

Any suggestions on how?


No. What you are doing is incitement. You are inciting the lowest level of society into following your lead and indiscriminately being hostile to all Muslims.

Just demonstrates the shallowness of your morals.


Should my 'incitement' be censored?


I believe you should turn yourself in to your local police station and confess your extremist views and incitement attempts.


Do you think Charlie Hebdo should be censored in order to appease the terrorists?

What other pre-appeasement strategies would you suggest to stop the Muslims scaring you into post-appeasement?

Cods accusing other people of being thick:

cods wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:25pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 10:12am:
Quote:
FREEDOM OF SPEECH      its under  threat...when in fact sensible people no that isnt true...


That is your dumbest post so far cods. Every time I ask you to explain this crap you run away.

fine dont read themn then   you never answer so why should anyone else.. and on top of that you are pig rude..


Quote:
there is and never was  FREEDOM OF SPEECH... anywhere...only what the powers that be ALLOW...


You don't recognise it because it was handed to you on a platter cods. You are lucky, but you do not realise it.


why cant I call you a M)RON YOU STUPID ONE EYED LEFTY????....lets see if FREEDOM OF SPEECH WORKS ON FDS WEB?...

Quote:
if as has been said I wanted to show porn on this forum


Cods I have explained this to you at least a dozen times already. You are yet to even acknowledge the response. You just keep posting the same stupid thing over and over again. Not sure how to dumb it down any more for you. Which part are you having trouble comprehending?

Quote:
Religion descends to commit the greatest evils when it controls the state.


This is what cods wants.



and death at least for others from other countries is what fd wants..


he doesnt mind OTHERS being killed for a cartoon for christ sake..

you are so =dumb I cant even be bothered anymore..

dont understand it.. TOUGH,.I cant help it if your THICK AS TWO SHORT PLANKS....

gees I like this FREEDOM OF SPEECH>

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 17th, 2015 at 5:07pm by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Svengali
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #20 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 5:08pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 5:00pm:
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:26pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:02pm:
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 2:35pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 2:22pm:
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:45pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:27pm:
So the terrorism is all our fault?

Tell me svengali, how far would you go to appease the terrorists?


The appropriate policy and principle is to avoid creating disaffected persons in the first place.

You obviously have not known any Muslims and not ventured out of Australia other than short trips. You are just a stooge and dupe of more powerful forces of hostility.


So you are more a fan of pre-appeasement? We must guess what will drive the Muslims into a mad rage and placate them before they do it?

Any suggestions on how?


No. What you are doing is incitement. You are inciting the lowest level of society into following your lead and indiscriminately being hostile to all Muslims.

Just demonstrates the shallowness of your morals.


Should my 'incitement' be censored?


I believe you should turn yourself in to your local police station and confess your extremist views and incitement attempts.


Do you think Charlie Hebdo should be censored in order to appease the terrorists?

What other pre-appeasement strategies would you suggest to stop the Muslims scaring you into post-appeasement?


I suggest sending Freediver to Syria with a sign disparaging the prophet Mohammed. I am willing to contribute to the ticket.

Freediver can then engage with those he wishes to change.
Back to top
 

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38800
Gender: male
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #21 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 5:12pm
 
Quote:
Do you think Charlie Hebdo should be censored in order to appease the terrorists?


I'd put it another way.  Why must they stick their beak into something they could just ignore.  What is the trumping all and compelling need for them to ridicule, abuse, mock and pour scorn?

Freediver, do you believe that God impregnated  the virgin Mary while Jo was away busy with other erections, and Jesus Christ was the offspring?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #22 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 5:15pm
 
...
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49193
At my desk.
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #23 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 5:32pm
 
Dear Aussie. I want to appease terrorists. Which human right do you think I should give up first?

Aussie wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:10pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:05pm:
Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:03pm:
bogarde73 wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 2:49pm:
Well maybe it's just me greg, but it sure seems many on the left are walking a pretty thin line trying to avoid condemning the fanatics for fear of upsetting the muslim world generally.

The case in point here, how could gay & lesbian people have any respect for a religious faith which seems to condone such treatment?



I have not seen one person on here have anything but condemnation for the terrorists. We are collectively on the same page. How could anyone not condemn cold blooded murder?

We wholeheartedly condemn fanatics, terrorists, jihadists.....this is where the confusion lies.....just those, not Islam or Muslims.



Yes we condemn them. But the real question is, how do we appease them? Right, pansi?


How about not going out of out of way to piss them off with ridicule, abuse and incitement to hate them or hold them in scorn?  Or is your precious and nefarious and selective 'freeeeedom of speech' far more important?


Aussie! Aussie! He's our man! If he can't appease terrorists, no-one can!

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 4:05pm:
Aussie wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:10pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:05pm:
Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:03pm:
bogarde73 wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 2:49pm:
Well maybe it's just me greg, but it sure seems many on the left are walking a pretty thin line trying to avoid condemning the fanatics for fear of upsetting the muslim world generally.

The case in point here, how could gay & lesbian people have any respect for a religious faith which seems to condone such treatment?



I have not seen one person on here have anything but condemnation for the terrorists. We are collectively on the same page. How could anyone not condemn cold blooded murder?

We wholeheartedly condemn fanatics, terrorists, jihadists.....this is where the confusion lies.....just those, not Islam or Muslims.



Yes we condemn them. But the real question is, how do we appease them? Right, pansi?


How about not going out of out of way to piss them off with ridicule, abuse and incitement to hate them or hold them in scorn?  Or is your precious and nefarious and selective 'freeeeedom of speech' far more important?



What Aussie said.

If you want to deliberately p1ss them off, then find your own way to calm them down. Ask the past and present US presidents, they started it.


In a struggle between freedom of speech and religious sensitivities, cods goes straight for an objective source - the pope:

cods wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 3:44pm:
Svengali wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:45pm:
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:27pm:
So the terrorism is all our fault?

Tell me svengali, how far would you go to appease the terrorists?


The appropriate policy and principle is to avoid creating disaffected persons in the first place.

You obviously have not known any Muslims and not ventured out of Australia other than short trips. You are just a stooge and dupe of more powerful forces of hostility.



poor old FD he is losing git... he is now like son of greg.

who repeats repeats repeats and then he repeats it all over again....


heres you answer fd..

ev en the Pope is on our side..


MANILA, Philippines (AP) — Pope Francis said there are limits to freedom of speech, especially when it insults or ridicules someone's faith, in comments that the Vatican later said Friday did not mean justifying the attack on the satirical French magazine Charlie Hebdo.

Related Stories

Pope Francis spoke about the Paris terror attacks while en route to the Philippines on Thursday, defending free speech as not only a fundamental human right but a duty to speak one's mind for the sake of the common good.

But he said there were limits.

By way of example, he referred to Alberto Gasbarri, who organizes papal trips and was standing by his side aboard the papal plane.

"If my good friend Dr. Gasbarri says a curse word against my mother, he can expect a punch," Francis said half-jokingly, throwing a mock punch his way. "It's normal. You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others


so who were the BULLY BOYS FD?....

who provoked the angry death bees?>.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 17th, 2015 at 5:46pm by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38800
Gender: male
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #24 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 5:53pm
 
Quote:
In a struggle between freedom of speech and religious sensitivities, cods goes straight for an objective source - the pope:


What is the problem with quoting the Pope?  You use Charlie Hebdo as your shining light.  Why can't cods take the other point of view, or, as appears to be the case, is it that you regard yourself as correct no matter what, and be damned anyone who disagrees with you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49193
At my desk.
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #25 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 5:59pm
 
I am right. Cods is wrong, on many levels. I am happy to explain each one. In fact I have, several times already.

Tell me Aussie, how far do you think we should go to appease terrorists? What rights should we abandon for them, and what do you think the consequences of such spineless appeasement would be?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38800
Gender: male
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #26 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 6:19pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 5:59pm:
I am right. Cods is wrong, on many levels. I am happy to explain each one. In fact I have, several times already.

Tell me Aussie, how far do you think we should go to appease terrorists? What rights should we abandon for them, and what do you think the consequences of such spineless appeasement would be?


You may have missed what I said earlier.

Quote:
how about you outline your suggested alternative program of appeasement and what you think the outcome would be if we were stupid enough to follow?


I am not taking you seriously on the matter, ever.  You are trolling pure and simple.  You ask for ideas but announce in advance that anyone who took them up would be stupid.

Have you answered my question about God/Mary/Jo/Jesus yet?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49193
At my desk.
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #27 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 6:44pm
 
Feel free to prove me wrong about the stupid thing Aussie. Blind us with your intellect. How far do you think we should go to appease terrorists? What rights should we abandon for them, and what do you think the consequences of such spineless appeasement would be?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38800
Gender: male
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #28 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 6:49pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 6:44pm:
Feel free to prove me wrong about the stupid thing Aussie. Blind us with your intellect. How far do you think we should go to appease terrorists? What rights should we abandon for them, and what do you think the consequences of such spineless appeasement would be?


If you ever once even, truly engaged in a discussion with a view to not ramming your own preconceived views down my throat, I'd bother.

So, I won't.

You have already announced that anyone who offered an idea would only see that idea followed by stupid people.

You are the quintessential troll, no doubt about it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74797
Gender: male
Re: cheese eating surrender monkeys
Reply #29 - Jan 17th, 2015 at 6:51pm
 
freediver wrote on Jan 17th, 2015 at 1:22pm:
I don't mean the French (that would be wacist).

To all those who object to Charlie Hebdo continuing to publish Muhammed cartoons in the face of Islamic terrorism - instead of simply blaming the cartoonists for their own demise, how about you outline your suggested alternative program



they could always publish them on Ozpolitic Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 ... 12
Send Topic Print