Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 54
Send Topic Print
FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. (Read 56111 times)
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #180 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:18pm
 
Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 5:59pm:
cods wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 5:48pm:
I do know a bragger when I see one...I have even seen the undies they wear with dare I say it padding???.....yep no need for socks anymore...

arent you just a little bit jealous.?....in my day it was only us girls that cheated... with tissues....now you can pay god knows what for what they call chicken fillets....does the same job as tissues....just costs more..lolol


Me ...Yes of course....

He reminds me of an old Vietnamese bloke I knew...

HimHungLong

or was it

HungLong?

Sad when you reach 70 it all becomes a bit vague!

Mmmm    Sad Sad



I think you are thinking about the Asian piano player...when someone called out
do you know.. you have one hanging down..

and he replied.. sorry me have never heard of that song
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #181 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:25pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 5:05pm:
Quantum,
run for your life buddy.
this thread has got cods, pansi, greenswin, this Dr Caliagari fooker, dreamryder, Ian and the horse all chipping in.
Its like the perfect storm of shiit.
i have read it from start to finish and i'm nominating it for worst performance in a thread by the intellectually disabled for 2015.
all thats missing is pecker Wink


I don't think even the peccahead would sink to the levels exhibited here.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138309
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #182 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:25pm
 
nasus wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:11pm:
Not certain where you get your stupid inflated, incorrect, and dumb American figures from, some obscure manipulated figures I guess.

In Australia if our figures are <100, IT IS because we bloooddddy well only have 22 Million population as compared to the USA of 330 Million.
Try my figures:
United States            88.8      270,000,000      9,960      3.2      
The 88.8 is firearms per person, the figure of 270 million is the actual number, THE 9,960 is the number of homicides by use of firearms, THE 3.2 is per 100,000 of population.
Thanks for posting you bias figures. 



Bias figures?

You actually moved the goal posts.

He said: "annual death toll from firearms"

The annual death toll from firearms in the US is approximately 33,000.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:30pm by greggerypeccary »  
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #183 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:27pm
 
nasus wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 5:23pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 4:26pm:
nasus wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:17pm:
Life_goes_on wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:02pm:
Far out, what countries do these people live in to feel that they need to carry a concealed firearm?



I live in Australia, and possibly prior to 2000 I would have agreed with you. However I was different then.
I think the quote goes something like this " I would rather carry and never ever need it, than need it and not carry."
Pistols weigh around 1.3kgs, easily concealable, no big deal, nothing happens, no one will ever know you carried.


The USA experience dictates otherwise.  More personally-owned guns kill their owners than attackers.  Also, a fight among aussies is likely to be done with fists.  In USA it is common to escalate to guns.  Hence the 50,000 annual death toll from firearms vs our <100


Apologies, just admit you are a Green, you have not the slightest idea what a firearm is whom it kills, and that firearm ownership actually reduces crime. I'm certain you will not come across, you are an anti gunner, no matter what you are shown as facts, you will always like the anti gun lobby find your own facts. be well, live long. There are many more countries in the world with larger deaths from handguns than America. As few actual handguns are used in assaults, but as they say, never let facts interfere with a good story.


and speaking of facts... but of course you aren't are you?  And it is always the same with you pro-gun nutters.  You deny virtually everything and pretend that guns keep you safe.  yes there are a few countries  with hire gun deaths eg South Africa, Brazil, Mexico.  So that's the crowd you aim to beat?

Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #184 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:30pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:25pm:
nasus wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:11pm:
[quote author=longweekend58 link=]Far out, what countries do these people live in to feel that they need to carry a concealed firearm?



I live in Australia, and possibly prior to 2000 I would have agreed with you. However I was different then.
I think the quote goes something like this " I would rather carry and never ever need it, than need it and not carry."
Pistols weigh around 1.3kgs, easily concealable, no big deal, nothing happens, no one will ever know you carried.


The USA experience dictates otherwise.  More personally-owned guns kill their owners than attackers.  Also, a fight among aussies is likely to be done with fists.  In USA it is common to escalate to guns.  Hence the 50,000 annual death toll from firearms vs our <100


Not certain where you get your stupid inflated, incorrect, and dumb American figures from, some obscure manipulated figures I guess.

In Australia if our figures are <100, IT IS because we bloooddddy well only have 22 Million population as compared to the USA of 330 Million.
Try my figures:
United States            88.8      270,000,000      9,960      3.2      
The 88.8 is firearms per person, the figure of 270 million is the actual number, THE 9,960 is the number of homicides by use of firearms, THE 3.2 is per 100,000 of population.
Thanks for posting you bias figures. 



The annual death toll from firearms in the US is approximately 33,000.

[/quote]

so.. the figure is 33,000 instead of 50,000.  does that in IN WAY change the argument??  They have 16 times our population and  96 times our homicide rate.  we have around 100 gun deaths a year or around 1/3300 of the USA.

It hardly makes a pro-gun argument does it?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #185 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:31pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:25pm:
nasus wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:11pm:
Not certain where you get your stupid inflated, incorrect, and dumb American figures from, some obscure manipulated figures I guess.

In Australia if our figures are <100, IT IS because we bloooddddy well only have 22 Million population as compared to the USA of 330 Million.
Try my figures:
United States            88.8      270,000,000      9,960      3.2      
The 88.8 is firearms per person, the figure of 270 million is the actual number, THE 9,960 is the number of homicides by use of firearms, THE 3.2 is per 100,000 of population.
Thanks for posting you bias figures. 



The annual death toll from firearms in the US is approximately 33,000.

"annual death toll from firearms"


and your point is what exactly?
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #186 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:34pm
 
Panther wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 5:46pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 4:26pm:
nasus wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:17pm:
Life_goes_on wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 3:02pm:
Far out, what countries do these people live in to feel that they need to carry a concealed firearm?



I live in Australia, and possibly prior to 2000 I would have agreed with you. However I was different then.
I think the quote goes something like this " I would rather carry and never ever need it, than need it and not carry."
Pistols weigh around 1.3kgs, easily concealable, no big deal, nothing happens, no one will ever know you carried.


The USA experience dictates otherwise.  More personally-owned guns kill their owners than attackers.  Also, a fight among aussies is likely to be done with fists.  In USA it is common to escalate to guns.  Hence the 50,000 annual death toll from firearms vs our <100


Respectfully, I ask you to please simply do your homework, & investigate your assertions.

They are incorrect, & your numbers are more than 5 times higher than the actual figures published by the FBI every year, for your (and everyone elses) researching pleasure.

Get the facts, & if you wish come back & post a correction.

The numbers aren't sweet by any means, but they are far, far lower than you suggest .... sorry.

Thanks http://www.smileyfaze.tk/slides/cheerskj4.gif




http://i.imgur.com/Tbbc4qj.jpg



Ive had this debate more times than you can count.  And the statistics the pro-gun lobby come up with are astonishing.  They exclude accidents and anything else they can. I actually debated with one nutter that thinks the gun death toll is 250 per year. (yep, not a typo)

Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Life_goes_on
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4772
400kms south of Yobsville, Qld
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #187 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:36pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:31pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:25pm:
nasus wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:11pm:
Not certain where you get your stupid inflated, incorrect, and dumb American figures from, some obscure manipulated figures I guess.

In Australia if our figures are <100, IT IS because we bloooddddy well only have 22 Million population as compared to the USA of 330 Million.
Try my figures:
United States            88.8      270,000,000      9,960      3.2      
The 88.8 is firearms per person, the figure of 270 million is the actual number, THE 9,960 is the number of homicides by use of firearms, THE 3.2 is per 100,000 of population.
Thanks for posting you bias figures. 



The annual death toll from firearms in the US is approximately 33,000.

"annual death toll from firearms"


and your point is what exactly?


Hahahaha you're trying to fight with someone on your side of the argument.
Back to top
 

"You're just one lucky motherf-cker" - Someone, 5th February 2013

Num num num num.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138309
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #188 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:37pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:31pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:25pm:
nasus wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:11pm:
Not certain where you get your stupid inflated, incorrect, and dumb American figures from, some obscure manipulated figures I guess.

In Australia if our figures are <100, IT IS because we bloooddddy well only have 22 Million population as compared to the USA of 330 Million.
Try my figures:
United States            88.8      270,000,000      9,960      3.2      
The 88.8 is firearms per person, the figure of 270 million is the actual number, THE 9,960 is the number of homicides by use of firearms, THE 3.2 is per 100,000 of population.
Thanks for posting you bias figures. 



The annual death toll from firearms in the US is approximately 33,000.

"annual death toll from firearms"


and your point is what exactly?



He's quoting the wrong figures.

The toll is much higher than what he's claiming.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Panther
Gold Member
*****
Offline


My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11523
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #189 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:42pm
 
Freedom of Speech

Quote:
One sperm says to the other sperm, "How far is it to the ovary?"



The other sperm says, "Relax. We haven't even passed her tonsils yet."
Back to top
 

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #190 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:42pm
 
Gun rights people are always entertaining.  And stupid.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
nasus
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 198
3rd planet
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #191 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:44pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:37pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:31pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:25pm:
nasus wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:11pm:
Not certain where you get your stupid inflated, incorrect, and dumb American figures from, some obscure manipulated figures I guess.

In Australia if our figures are <100, IT IS because we bloooddddy well only have 22 Million population as compared to the USA of 330 Million.
Try my figures:
United States            88.8      270,000,000      9,960      3.2      
The 88.8 is firearms per person, the figure of 270 million is the actual number, THE 9,960 is the number of homicides by use of firearms, THE 3.2 is per 100,000 of population.
Thanks for posting you bias figures. 



The annual death toll from firearms in the US is approximately 33,000.

"annual death toll from firearms"


and your point is what exactly?



He's quoting the wrong figures.

The toll is much higher than what he's claiming.




Sorry I have attempted several times to place my links onto the post. I every time am confronted with "you cannot use live links" etc. I need 100 post before I can use a live link. Even if I could use the links, an ANTI gunner Is an ANTI gunner, anti everything, have no idea what a firearm is, I'm certain if I had a flintlock pistol, which are fun to use, I'm certain they would deny my ownership. To an anti gunner, a flintlock is a military style weapon, and nothing will change their narrow minds.
Back to top
 

"I may not believe in what you say, however I will defend unto death your right to say it". Attributed to Voltaire. Freedom of speech a right we must regain.
 
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29775
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #192 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:45pm
 
Now back to Freedom of Speech

Here's a guy expressing his about the religion that got Cods on her high horse over the Charlie Hebdo atrocity

now if Cods had this blokes guts her opinion may be respected ....

Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #193 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:45pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:37pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:31pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:25pm:
nasus wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:11pm:
Not certain where you get your stupid inflated, incorrect, and dumb American figures from, some obscure manipulated figures I guess.

In Australia if our figures are <100, IT IS because we bloooddddy well only have 22 Million population as compared to the USA of 330 Million.
Try my figures:
United States            88.8      270,000,000      9,960      3.2      
The 88.8 is firearms per person, the figure of 270 million is the actual number, THE 9,960 is the number of homicides by use of firearms, THE 3.2 is per 100,000 of population.
Thanks for posting you bias figures. 



The annual death toll from firearms in the US is approximately 33,000.

"annual death toll from firearms"


and your point is what exactly?



He's quoting the wrong figures.

The toll is much higher than what he's claiming.



I think I had a 'quoting problem' thinking you said something that nasus said.

oops:)
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 138309
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #194 - Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:46pm
 
cods wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 6:18pm:
Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 5:59pm:
cods wrote on Jan 21st, 2015 at 5:48pm:
I do know a bragger when I see one...I have even seen the undies they wear with dare I say it padding???.....yep no need for socks anymore...

arent you just a little bit jealous.?....in my day it was only us girls that cheated... with tissues....now you can pay god knows what for what they call chicken fillets....does the same job as tissues....just costs more..lolol


Me ...Yes of course....

He reminds me of an old Vietnamese bloke I knew...

HimHungLong

or was it

HungLong?

Sad when you reach 70 it all becomes a bit vague!

Mmmm    Sad Sad



I think you are thinking about the Asian piano player...when someone called out
do you know.. you have one hanging down..

and he replied.. sorry me have never heard of that song



There's an old bloke in the nursing home playing the piano on a hot day with shorts on.

One of the ladies listening to his concert notices a ball, followed by another ball, making their way out of his shorts.

To try and head off a catastrophe she leaps up and whispers in his ear: ”Do you know your nuts are hanging down through the old wicker chair?”

To which he replies, “No, I don’t do country and western, but if you hum a few bars I’ll pick it up pretty quick.”
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 54
Send Topic Print