Australian Politics Forum - FREEDOM OF SPEECH..

Redmond Neck Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 21651 ACT Gender:	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #270 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 4:15pm bump
Back to top	BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS. ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS! IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #271 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 4:27pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 11:40am:

cods wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:49am:

Panther wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:27am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:20am:

cods doesn't get 'principles'. this entire debate is about a PRINCIPLE, not a cartoon. She doesnt get 'scale of offence' when discussing child crimes either.

Well, my sun doesn't rise or set depending on how her feeble feminine mind wants to massage it.

She's simply a woman, & credit is exacted where credit is due.

really hey you are agreeing with a paedo lover you know........ you and longy putting all your FoS to good use..... I think its wonderful

when you guys going to march for YOUR principles then..?
will you be wearing one of longies child abusers have rights as well t/shirts????>.

he also thinks child porn is ok .. its his second FoS... he thinks it isnt bad if its just on computers....

hes an authority on paedos...

and hates anyone who makes a stand against child abuse....

its his principles you see.

its a paedos right to do as he does..... Angry

..

so put me down all you like.. but I dont care for your choice of friends..

you really deserve a ban you drongo. Calling people paedo supporters deserves both a ban and in real life, a punch in the face. Don't you realise how pitiful you sound calling people paedos because they don't agree with your cowardly, disgraceful backdowns?

you dont want me to look for them do you???

you shouted long and loud when mums were complaining about about not knowing when paedos were living in their streets,,

you said..

they have served their time.. leave them alone....and more....

you were completely on their side.. so dont try to wriggle out of it now..

why would you have brought them into this otherwise???????..

you thought sneering at me for supporting kids was the way to go....erk...

come on you being so smart you think we all suffer memory loss....I have only had one or two run ins with you......and unless you use my ID I stay away from you for the simple reason I dont like paedophiles and or people who support the..

so turn everything back on me as you are wont to do.. most nasty minded people wouldnt know how to debate something anyway and you are more that in that group..as you demonstrate every day

personal abuse it all you have got and you lie with the best of them

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #272 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 4:29pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 3:20pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 2:05pm:

Jesus! Settle down cods!!!

Breath slowly in slowly out!

be careful! she'll call you a Paedo soon.

no longy ONLY YOU dont try to share your shame....

when I have time I will look for those threads.. you better believe it..

I did not call anyone a PAEDO BTW stop lying..

I called you a PAEDO SUPPORTER....so stop the bloody lies.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #273 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 4:33pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 3:35pm:

The bully boys are out in force today!

you should get out more red they are following me all over the forum as they see their manhood being threatened....they havent worked it out yet what they are fighting for......one says FoS another Principle.. even though they havent got any themselves...

and others think Hitler will come back if we stop insulting cartoons...its all kind of got murky

so now I think its a manhood problem..

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16616
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #274 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 6:02pm

cods wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 4:33pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 3:35pm:

The bully boys are out in force today!

you should get out more red they are following me all over the forum as they see their manhood being threatened....they havent worked it out yet what they are fighting for......one says FoS another Principle.. even though they havent got any themselves...

and others think Hitler will come back if we stop insulting cartoons...its all kind of got murky

so now I think its a manhood problem..

You should give it up cods, you're going from amusingly dotty to off the deep end. Don't play the victim over this either, it's just an observation, this is my first post in this thread(oops second) but I have read it all.

I'm with you as far as I wouldn't draw those cartoons and don't know why one would but that's as far as it can go. It was their choice and legal FoS in France, did they deserve to die? No. But just as a race car driver knows the risk and continues, so did these people. If they choose to do it and think it's worth it, as they do because they are continuing, you need to let them. It's that simple. Murder is not legal, the cartoons are.

If you bring up the line "would you do this if they threatened to kill your family??!?!?" I would put it to my family and ask, not just cave in as you advise, I have 3 sons and I doubt they or my wife would cave, maybe they would, we haven't been in that situation.

Anyway. you need to let it go, you are not going to change anyone's mind with the arguments you are using.

Save your sanity.
Forgive remember.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #275 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 6:24pm

Setanta wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

die? No. But just as a race car driver knows the risk and continues, so did these people. If they choose to do it and think it's worth it, as they do because they are continuing, you need to let them. It's that simple. Murder is not legal, the cartoons are.

If you bring up the line "would you do this if they threatened to kill your family??!?!?" I would put it to my family and ask, not just cave in as you advise, I have 3 sons and I doubt they or my wife would cave, maybe they would, we haven't been in that situation.

Anyway. you need to let it go, you are not going to change anyone's mind with the arguments you are using.

Save your sanity.
Forgive remember.

yep lets all talk about Stephen Fry marrying his boy friend???>. Roll Eyes

btw you can do that you know... if this is so boring....

how come you dont tell fd the same thing..

or maybe quantum....

lets be just a tiny bit fair here sentanta.

neither me nor pansi are abusing anyone....we dont mention old bitches.. I have been told to eat horse medicine...

where were you when that was thrown at myself???...

on the clive palmer political board rocky suggests I eat Pal dog food...why??? you would need to ask him as it has nothing to do with an ything... but its abuse of myself..

I find this topic very very relevant for the moment....

its starting a chain reaction.. ,maybe you havent noticed..but yes ISIL is now making direct threats to Australia.....

are they sick of the bullying and insults..

maybe I dont know..

all I do kn ow setanta is....

I wouldnt poke a stick into the eye of a mad bull..

these brave men would Roll Eyes

I say good luck to them..

do you agree your freedom of speech is safer than ever before over this sacrifice.....?

btw I dont think I have used would you look after your family...

maybe!!!! but it isnt a line I think solves anything to be honest.....I know that self preservation is a human thing....

what I did or may have asked.

is would you not have printed that cartoon had you had that warning??>..

or would you take that risk?..

most turn the attack back onto myself...

like it or not all those dead.. were members of someones family.

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16616
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #276 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 6:37pm

cods wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 11:40am:

cods wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:49am:

Panther wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:27am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:20am:

cods doesn't get 'principles'. this entire debate is about a PRINCIPLE, not a cartoon. She doesnt get 'scale of offence' when discussing child crimes either.

Well, my sun doesn't rise or set depending on how her feeble feminine mind wants to massage it.

She's simply a woman, & credit is exacted where credit is due.

really hey you are agreeing with a paedo lover you know........ you and longy putting all your FoS to good use..... I think its wonderful

when you guys going to march for YOUR principles then..?
will you be wearing one of longies child abusers have rights as well t/shirts????>.

he also thinks child porn is ok .. its his second FoS... he thinks it isnt bad if its just on computers....

hes an authority on paedos...

and hates anyone who makes a stand against child abuse....

its his principles you see.

its a paedos right to do as he does..... Angry

..

so put me down all you like.. but I dont care for your choice of friends..

you really deserve a ban you drongo. Calling people paedo supporters deserves both a ban and in real life, a punch in the face. Don't you realise how pitiful you sound calling people paedos because they don't agree with your cowardly, disgraceful backdowns?

you dont want me to look for them do you???

you shouted long and loud when mums were complaining about about not knowing when paedos were living in their streets,,

you said..

they have served their time.. leave them alone....and more....

you were completely on their side.. so dont try to wriggle out of it now..

why would you have brought them into this otherwise???????..

you thought sneering at me for supporting kids was the way to go....erk...

come on you being so smart you think we all suffer memory loss....I have only had one or two run ins with you......and unless you use my ID I stay away from you for the simple reason I dont like paedophiles and or people who support the..

so turn everything back on me as you are wont to do.. most nasty minded people wouldnt know how to debate something anyway and you are more that in that group..as you demonstrate every day

personal abuse it all you have got and you lie with the best of them

removed - wrong post responded to.

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16616
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #277 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 6:40pm

cods wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 6:24pm:

Setanta wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 6:02pm:

die? No. But just as a race car driver knows the risk and continues, so did these people. If they choose to do it and think it's worth it, as they do because they are continuing, you need to let them. It's that simple. Murder is not legal, the cartoons are.

If you bring up the line "would you do this if they threatened to kill your family??!?!?" I would put it to my family and ask, not just cave in as you advise, I have 3 sons and I doubt they or my wife would cave, maybe they would, we haven't been in that situation.

Anyway. you need to let it go, you are not going to change anyone's mind with the arguments you are using.

Save your sanity.
Forgive remember.

yep lets all talk about Stephen Fry marrying his boy friend???>. Roll Eyes

btw you can do that you know... if this is so boring....

how come you dont tell fd the same thing..

or maybe quantum....

lets be just a tiny bit fair here sentanta.

neither me nor pansi are abusing anyone....we dont mention old bitches.. I have been told to eat horse medicine...

where were you when that was thrown at myself???...

on the clive palmer political board rocky suggests I eat Pal dog food...why??? you would need to ask him as it has nothing to do with an ything... but its abuse of myself..

I find this topic very very relevant for the moment....

its starting a chain reaction.. ,maybe you havent noticed..but yes ISIL is now making direct threats to Australia.....

are they sick of the bullying and insults..

maybe I dont know..

all I do kn ow setanta is....

I wouldnt poke a stick into the eye of a mad bull..

these brave men would Roll Eyes

I say good luck to them..

do you agree your freedom of speech is safer than ever before over this sacrifice.....?

btw I dont think I have used would you look after your family...

maybe!!!! but it isnt a line I think solves anything to be honest.....I know that self preservation is a human thing....

what I did or may have asked.

is would you not have printed that cartoon had you had that warning??>..

or would you take that risk?..

most turn the attack back onto myself...

like it or not all those dead.. were members of someones family.

See what I mean a bout the deep end?

edit:
Quote:

what I did or may have asked.
is would you not have printed that cartoon had you had that warning??>..
or would you take that risk?..
most turn the attack back onto myself...
like it or not all those dead.. were members of someones family.

Yes, I would if I thought it was important. Charlie is continuing so they think it is. I don't but it's not my call, I think they suck... but... You just don't bow to threats unless you want to be threatened every day.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 6:46pm by Setanta »

IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16616
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #278 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 7:13pm

Cods, let me ask you a question in terms you should understand...

Would you stay with an abusive cruel hubby if he threatened your life if you left? Sure you can take out an AVO but they don't stop murder, people ignore them, it happens far too often. So would you, for your safety and the threat of loss of life, stay and be walked over?

From what you have said on this thread, you would.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #279 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 7:50pm

cods wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 11:40am:

cods wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:49am:

Panther wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:27am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:20am:

cods doesn't get 'principles'. this entire debate is about a PRINCIPLE, not a cartoon. She doesnt get 'scale of offence' when discussing child crimes either.

Well, my sun doesn't rise or set depending on how her feeble feminine mind wants to massage it.

She's simply a woman, & credit is exacted where credit is due.

really hey you are agreeing with a paedo lover you know........ you and longy putting all your FoS to good use..... I think its wonderful

when you guys going to march for YOUR principles then..?
will you be wearing one of longies child abusers have rights as well t/shirts????>.

he also thinks child porn is ok .. its his second FoS... he thinks it isnt bad if its just on computers....

hes an authority on paedos...

and hates anyone who makes a stand against child abuse....

its his principles you see.

its a paedos right to do as he does..... Angry

..

so put me down all you like.. but I dont care for your choice of friends..

you really deserve a ban you drongo. Calling people paedo supporters deserves both a ban and in real life, a punch in the face. Don't you realise how pitiful you sound calling people paedos because they don't agree with your cowardly, disgraceful backdowns?

you dont want me to look for them do you???

you shouted long and loud when mums were complaining about about not knowing when paedos were living in their streets,,

you said..

they have served their time.. leave them alone....and more....

you were completely on their side.. so dont try to wriggle out of it now..

why would you have brought them into this otherwise???????..

you thought sneering at me for supporting kids was the way to go....erk...

come on you being so smart you think we all suffer memory loss....I have only had one or two run ins with you......and unless you use my ID I stay away from you for the simple reason I dont like paedophiles and or people who support the..

so turn everything back on me as you are wont to do.. most nasty minded people wouldnt know how to debate something anyway and you are more that in that group..as you demonstrate every day

personal abuse it all you have got and you lie with the best of them

you are an arsehole cods and deserve all the contempt and abuse you are getting now. You simply cannot cope with anyone having an opinion that disagrees with you. the paedo claims are disgraceful and indicative of the horrid person you have become. after all, is anyone calling you a terrorist because of your weak attitude to them? Is anyone calling you a supporter of terrorism because you oppose standing up to them?

Or should we start calling you a terrorist sympathiser because by your own insane thinking methods, you clearly are.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

Panther

Gold Member

Offline

My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11523
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #280 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 8:05pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 7:50pm:

cods wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 11:40am:

cods wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:49am:

Panther wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:27am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:20am:

cods doesn't get 'principles'. this entire debate is about a PRINCIPLE, not a cartoon. She doesnt get 'scale of offence' when discussing child crimes either.

Well, my sun doesn't rise or set depending on how her feeble feminine mind wants to massage it.

She's simply a woman, & credit is exacted where credit is due.

really hey you are agreeing with a paedo lover you know........ you and longy putting all your FoS to good use..... I think its wonderful

when you guys going to march for YOUR principles then..?
will you be wearing one of longies child abusers have rights as well t/shirts????>.

he also thinks child porn is ok .. its his second FoS... he thinks it isnt bad if its just on computers....

hes an authority on paedos...

and hates anyone who makes a stand against child abuse....

its his principles you see.

its a paedos right to do as he does..... Angry

..

so put me down all you like.. but I dont care for your choice of friends..

you really deserve a ban you drongo. Calling people paedo supporters deserves both a ban and in real life, a punch in the face. Don't you realise how pitiful you sound calling people paedos because they don't agree with your cowardly, disgraceful backdowns?

you dont want me to look for them do you???

you shouted long and loud when mums were complaining about about not knowing when paedos were living in their streets,,

you said..

they have served their time.. leave them alone....and more....

you were completely on their side.. so dont try to wriggle out of it now..

why would you have brought them into this otherwise???????..

you thought sneering at me for supporting kids was the way to go....erk...

come on you being so smart you think we all suffer memory loss....I have only had one or two run ins with you......and unless you use my ID I stay away from you for the simple reason I dont like paedophiles and or people who support the..

so turn everything back on me as you are wont to do.. most nasty minded people wouldnt know how to debate something anyway and you are more that in that group..as you demonstrate every day

personal abuse it all you have got and you lie with the best of them

you are an arsehole cods and deserve all the contempt and abuse you are getting now. You simply cannot cope with anyone having an opinion that disagrees with you. the paedo claims are disgraceful and indicative of the horrid person you have become. after all, is anyone calling you a terrorist because of your weak attitude to them? Is anyone calling you a supporter of terrorism because you oppose standing up to them?

Or should we start calling you a terrorist sympathiser because by your own insane thinking methods, you clearly are.

Ok.....Time Out..

As I see it, there seems to be 2 sides.

Both have gotten as far apart as possible.

Both are hovering precariously on the outer edges.

Now, lets try to focus all that combative energy, away from baseless name calling, & into constructive, hard nosed, flat out productive debate closer to the center.

Will you guys try, or are we in a death spiral with no way out?

Back to top

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #281 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 8:09pm

Setanta wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 7:13pm:

Cods, let me ask you a question in terms you should understand...

Would you stay with an abusive cruel hubby if he threatened your life if you left? Sure you can take out an AVO but they don't stop murder, people ignore them, it happens far too often. So would you, for your safety and the threat of loss of life, stay and be walked over?

From what you have said on this thread, you would.

you say I have troub le understanding... Roll Eyes

the two are completely different...and you know it...

but if I dont answer I will never hear the end of it..so here goes..

I am in a relationship that is violent...

you didnt say if he started off THREATENING DEATH...

you do know this is crucial dont you??

you see he would only have had to lift his hand to me.. and I would be gone........

what has this to do with FREEDOM OF SPEECH btw?...

women have left husband who threaten death.. if they leave and then they get thrown off balconies even when they havent left....

this sadden me actually that you use domestic violence as an example when we are dealing with more than domestic violence....

this group of people.. yes they are human beings the worst kind...

will do EVERYTHING THEY SAY THEY WILL...

not all men will kill their partners for leaving even though thats the threat..

how ever I wouldnt like to say these terrorist jihadists might never do what they say they will..

would you??>...

I prefer to believe them 100%.. one of the reasons is..

they glory in death... smelling someone blood,hanging heads on fence posts doesnt give them nightmares.. they thrive on it....

they even teach their young sons.. ways and means...its their life its all they live for..

what I am saying and have been for days.. which no one will admit

is NO I DO NOT THINK DRAWING A CARTOON WAS WORTH 17 PEOPLE DYING..

DO I BELIEVE THE CARTOON CSHOULD HAVE BEN WITHDRAWN YES I DO

DO I SEE IT AS A THREAT TO OUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH..

I SAY

WHAT FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS THAT?..

DO I THINK INSULTING ALL FORMS OF RELIGION SHOULD BE STOPPED...

YES I DO...

DO I FIND IT AMUSING OR CLEVER NO I DONT

DO I THINK IT IS A FORM OF BULLYING..

YES I DO...

WOULD IT BOTHER ME IF I NEVER SAW THIS TYPE OF CARTOON AGAIN

N O IT WOULDNT...

WOULD IT HAVE BEEN AN INFRINGEMENT ON OUT FOS HAD THEY WITHDRAWN IT..

I DOUBT ANYONE WOULD HAVE BEEN ANY THE WISER
AS THOSE PEOPLE WOULD BE ALIVE NOW...

IF BY ANY SLIM CHANCE IT DID IMPINGE ON MY FOS
THEN ITS A SACRIFICE I WOULD B E PREPARED TO MAKE...

MY ONLY CRIME IS NOT WAN TING PEOPLE KILLED AND NOT WANTING THIS TO SPREAD AROUND THE WORLD...

IS THAT PLAIN ENOUGH FOR YOU

PLEASE DO NOT BRING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTO THIS... MONIS WAS ON BAIL FOR IT... IN CASE YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN SO SOON...AND HIS POOR EXWIFE ISNT HERE TO TELL HER SIDE OF IT.. Angry

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #282 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 8:10pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 7:50pm:

cods wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 4:27pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 11:40am:

cods wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:49am:

Panther wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:27am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 10:20am:

cods doesn't get 'principles'. this entire debate is about a PRINCIPLE, not a cartoon. She doesnt get 'scale of offence' when discussing child crimes either.

Well, my sun doesn't rise or set depending on how her feeble feminine mind wants to massage it.

She's simply a woman, & credit is exacted where credit is due.

really hey you are agreeing with a paedo lover you know........ you and longy putting all your FoS to good use..... I think its wonderful

when you guys going to march for YOUR principles then..?
will you be wearing one of longies child abusers have rights as well t/shirts????>.

he also thinks child porn is ok .. its his second FoS... he thinks it isnt bad if its just on computers....

hes an authority on paedos...

and hates anyone who makes a stand against child abuse....

its his principles you see.

its a paedos right to do as he does..... Angry

..

so put me down all you like.. but I dont care for your choice of friends..

you really deserve a ban you drongo. Calling people paedo supporters deserves both a ban and in real life, a punch in the face. Don't you realise how pitiful you sound calling people paedos because they don't agree with your cowardly, disgraceful backdowns?

you dont want me to look for them do you???

you shouted long and loud when mums were complaining about about not knowing when paedos were living in their streets,,

you said..

they have served their time.. leave them alone....and more....

you were completely on their side.. so dont try to wriggle out of it now..

why would you have brought them into this otherwise???????..

you thought sneering at me for supporting kids was the way to go....erk...

come on you being so smart you think we all suffer memory loss....I have only had one or two run ins with you......and unless you use my ID I stay away from you for the simple reason I dont like paedophiles and or people who support the..

so turn everything back on me as you are wont to do.. most nasty minded people wouldnt know how to debate something anyway and you are more that in that group..as you demonstrate every day

personal abuse it all you have got and you lie with the best of them

you are an arsehole cods and deserve all the contempt and abuse you are getting now. You simply cannot cope with anyone having an opinion that disagrees with you. the paedo claims are disgraceful and indicative of the horrid person you have become. after all, is anyone calling you a terrorist because of your weak attitude to them? Is anyone calling you a supporter of terrorism because you oppose standing up to them?

Or should we start calling you a terrorist sympathiser because by your own insane thinking methods, you clearly are.

RUN ALONG FERAL. YOU HAVE NOTHING WORTH LISTENING TOO i AM AFRAID..

BTW DITTO THE ABOVE FOR YOU

Back to top

IP Logged

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #283 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 8:11pm DREAMRYDER i am not attacking or abusing anyone... or do you prefer to ignore that bit?..
Back to top	IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 34871
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #284 - Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 8:12pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 2:42pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 9:15am:

it_is_the_light wrote on Jan 22^nd, 2015 at 7:49am:

yet further

I do not judge those whom judge

this is merely observed

with so very much love

namaste

- : ) =

good stuff Light.

sometimes you post waffle (well actually a lot of the time you do), but sometimes you hit the nail on the head. and this is one of those times.

cods is being a bit judgemental about the fact that others are judging her.

you have nailed it.

now this may just be a case of

"if the light posts SO MUCH STUFF, he may eventually post something inciteful"

or it may just be that you really are inciteful.

either way , be at peace.

many blessings aqua and yes

beloved being the light transmits much information

it is so , and so be it

does this comfort thee ?

im interested

namaste

- : ) =

light, i think thats the point.
Even someone with no idea will sometimes just say a randomly intelligent thing.
And i imagine (whilst not being a statistician) that if you say lots of things , you will eventually get something right.
Sort of like "even a dead watch is correct twice a day"
Anyway, youre quite a unique individual.
Do you go on internet dating sites.
They always seem to feature guys who ride jetski's, are fabulous in the kitchen, love international travel and are members of a few wine clubs.
Would it be OK if i set up a false account on say RSVP under your name and we just posted some of your musings online and maybe we could set up a few coffee dates and you could get back to us.
I know no freemasons will probably contact you but there are a lot of "spiritual women" who could benefit from your guidance.

Back to top

IP Logged