Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 ... 54
Send Topic Print
FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. (Read 55906 times)
Panther
Gold Member
*****
Offline


My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11505
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #675 - Feb 14th, 2015 at 11:39am
 
Peter Panner wrote on Feb 14th, 2015 at 11:29am:
Sorry, I meant  the story is familiar. I remember reading it somewhere.


Impossible, but then again back in the '60's a hellava lot more common than today, so there's an outside chance something similar maybe.

Back to top
 

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #676 - Feb 14th, 2015 at 1:48pm
 
Phem there was no basis in fact because you were all over the place with what you were saying. Your posts were for the most part indistinguishable from cods'.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Peter Panner
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 111
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #677 - Feb 14th, 2015 at 2:50pm
 
Did you write that Dream? That's brilliant, fella. You should write a book.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #678 - Feb 14th, 2015 at 6:22pm
 
stryder wrote on Feb 14th, 2015 at 9:34am:
I wonder Cods.

Did you feel that same way when people kicked christianity, when people like madonna, martin scorcesee or the monty python gang ALL WHO MOCKED, CRITICISED OR JUST WANTED TO SHOW ANOTHER VERSION OF CHRIST.

DID YOU HAVE ANY ISSUE WITH THAT CODS, why dont you be fair for once ??????



you do struggle dont you???? its not me that gets upset about cartoons.. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

stryder wrote on Feb 14th, 2015 at 9:38am:
We are argueing against Cods position, not telling her to stop saying what she wants to say about it.


but its ok to call someone a coward/or other derogatory names...... sure is! AngryPhemanderac wrote on Feb 14th, 2015 at 9:52am:
I note that Cods has not really taken a backward step in this debate with you and few others, kind of makes the "appeaser" label look a wee bit silly if you look at it closely. Even despite Cods stated position being very much that of appeasment with regard specifically to nutjobs....It needs to be acknowledged she has not appeased you and others here.

Credit where it is due...



fd doesnt take kindly to that stance.. he cannot actually abuse he just ridicules cos that aint in his FoS rules.. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes.. I do my best to ignore...its getting harder to find someone who can debate a topic on here..sigh!freediver wrote on Feb 14th, 2015 at 10:15am:
Not at all, what it appears that Cods has rejected, is the methodology used to criticise her, on the basis of her stated position.


She has squirmed every way she can think of. However when I did get through to her about whether there might be consequences to her appeasement, her response was that I was being pedantic and that such questions are hypothetical and thus not worth thinking about



in your tiny brain fd.....only in your tiny brain.. I get bored with the same quote over and over ev en when answering a question you quote you own quote....you should be banned for stuffing up the context... rrep rrrrep rrrrepeating rrrrepeating

freediver wrote on Feb 14th, 2015 at 1:48pm:
Phem there was no basis in fact because you were all over the place with what you were saying. Your posts were for the most part indistinguishable from cods'.



in other word phem... the dill didnt understand a word you said.... Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

his dumbness is showing...thats why when he learnt the word appeasement he has to use it every time..

its newy cant be wasted.. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #679 - Feb 14th, 2015 at 7:22pm
 
Phem is someone came on here and insisted in thread after thread that we appease neo-Nazis, would you tell us all to respect their opinion and treat them with kid gloves because that is more effective?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #680 - Feb 14th, 2015 at 7:52pm
 
freediver wrote on Feb 14th, 2015 at 7:22pm:
Phem is someone came on here and insisted in thread after thread that we appease neo-Nazis, would you tell us all to respect their opinion and treat them with kid gloves because that is more effective?



do you stop people abusing other people on here just because they have a different take on things....ummmmmmmmmmmmm.. well do you?

how come its ok to APPEASE ABUSERS ON HERE.. but not a manic terrorist?? Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Peter Panner
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 111
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #681 - Feb 15th, 2015 at 4:13am
 
Being called names on an internet forum and having your head chopped off are the same according to cods.
Priceless.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Phemanderac
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3507
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #682 - Feb 15th, 2015 at 7:03am
 
freediver wrote on Feb 14th, 2015 at 1:48pm:
Phem there was no basis in fact because you were all over the place with what you were saying. Your posts were for the most part indistinguishable from cods'.


Wow, seriously?

That's too funny. Speaking of jumping all over the place.

So, after putting your comment through the ACME forum waffle generator I now understand your comment above....

In short, you have no argument so, rather than concede you compare my posts to Cods presumably as some kind of insult... Oh and as a dismissal, because hey, you can't actually argue about what I wrote.

Nice way to jump all over the place there.

My post was really quite straight forward but keep up the good work.


(Edit) WRT the snide comparison, I cannot decide if you are trying to insult me or Cods... Just sayin...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 15th, 2015 at 7:13am by Phemanderac »  

On the 26th of January you are all invited to celebrate little white penal day...

"They're not rules as such, more like guidelines" Pirates of the Caribbean..
 
IP Logged
 
Phemanderac
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3507
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #683 - Feb 15th, 2015 at 7:11am
 
freediver wrote on Feb 14th, 2015 at 7:22pm:
Phem is someone came on here and insisted in thread after thread that we appease neo-Nazis, would you tell us all to respect their opinion and treat them with kid gloves because that is more effective?


Why would I? That isn't what I have said previously.

It's a pretty simple concept really, I am quite surprised that a smart bloke like yourself struggles with this.

You can debate a contrary position to someone and quite clearly not need to resort to attacking them personally. Personal attacks equate to the debate being over and done with - the target of said attacks is not encouraged to expand, review or consider their thinking or thought process.

Now, as demonstrated, even with respectful debating, there are those who will hold their position with the tenacity of a pit bull. Perhaps at times, they are merely being a devils advocate and keeping the debate fires burning as it were.


There is a pretty big difference between, "respect their opinion and treat them with kid gloves because that is more effective" thinking and simply honest debating the topic with some intellectual integrity...

Do you seriously not get this? Before you answer, please note, I have noticed a pattern with your responses, whereby you re-frame that which has been said so it fits your preconceived notion - that is not intellectually honest.

So, honestly, do you seriously not get this?
Back to top
 

On the 26th of January you are all invited to celebrate little white penal day...

"They're not rules as such, more like guidelines" Pirates of the Caribbean..
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #684 - Feb 15th, 2015 at 7:55am
 
Phemanderac wrote on Feb 15th, 2015 at 7:03am:
freediver wrote on Feb 14th, 2015 at 1:48pm:
Phem there was no basis in fact because you were all over the place with what you were saying. Your posts were for the most part indistinguishable from cods'.


Wow, seriously?

That's too funny. Speaking of jumping all over the place.

So, after putting your comment through the ACME forum waffle generator I now understand your comment above....

In short, you have no argument so, rather than concede you compare my posts to Cods presumably as some kind of insult... Oh and as a dismissal, because hey, you can't actually argue about what I wrote.

Nice way to jump all over the place there.

My post was really quite straight forward but keep up the good work.


(Edit) WRT the snide comparison, I cannot decide if you are trying to insult me or Cods... Just sayin...



he has trouble with both of us... so its not hard to guess who has the problem.. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

its pretty sad when allw e get is people who can only debate the person and not the topic..

for instance I am not saying... the way I THINK it should have been handled is correct...I am just saying to my way of thinking it was worth a TRY..

what harm in giving it a try... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

how ever with fd and his ilk...they would put me in jail and throw away the key..

now I am accused of claiming website abuse is as as bad as chopping off a head...

all because I deem it as letting some people have the ir FREEDOM OF SPEECH rather violently...

and in fds case.. by comparisons...[cods/phem]
on his very own forum

yet someone cannot have their FREEDOM OF SPEECH to ask that an insulting cartoon be stopped...

where was head chopping mentioned BTW? Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Peter Panner
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 111
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #685 - Feb 15th, 2015 at 8:08am
 
Cods, scroll up 20cm. You'll see where you asked FD why it's ok to appease abusers but not manic terrorists? Dementia much?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #686 - Feb 15th, 2015 at 8:32am
 
Peter Panner wrote on Feb 15th, 2015 at 8:08am:
Cods, scroll up 20cm. You'll see where you asked FD why it's ok to appease abusers but not manic terrorists? Dementia much?



oh I didnt know they chopped heads off CHarlie Hebdo employees.....

perhaps you have the link to that. Angry

I am sure you wouldnt abuse someone if you didnt have the facts at hand.... would you? Angry Angry

or are you also one of those who think people with dementia are to be abused as well.. > Shocked
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #687 - Feb 15th, 2015 at 8:44am
 
Phemanderac wrote on Feb 15th, 2015 at 7:11am:
freediver wrote on Feb 14th, 2015 at 7:22pm:
Phem is someone came on here and insisted in thread after thread that we appease neo-Nazis, would you tell us all to respect their opinion and treat them with kid gloves because that is more effective?


Why would I? That isn't what I have said previously.

It's a pretty simple concept really, I am quite surprised that a smart bloke like yourself struggles with this.

You can debate a contrary position to someone and quite clearly not need to resort to attacking them personally. Personal attacks equate to the debate being over and done with - the target of said attacks is not encouraged to expand, review or consider their thinking or thought process.

Now, as demonstrated, even with respectful debating, there are those who will hold their position with the tenacity of a pit bull. Perhaps at times, they are merely being a devils advocate and keeping the debate fires burning as it were.


There is a pretty big difference between, "respect their opinion and treat them with kid gloves because that is more effective" thinking and simply honest debating the topic with some intellectual integrity...

Do you seriously not get this? Before you answer, please note, I have noticed a pattern with your responses, whereby you re-frame that which has been said so it fits your preconceived notion - that is not intellectually honest.

So, honestly, do you seriously not get this?


Do you have a problem with me referring to cods' suggested approach as spineless appeasement? What is the politically correct term?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #688 - Feb 15th, 2015 at 9:15am
 
Time to get your pompoms out cods.

freediver wrote on Feb 15th, 2015 at 9:08am:
We have an answer:

Copenhagen free speech debate shooting: One dead

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-31472423

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/81012000/jpg/_81012522_81012236.jpg

Denmark is on high alert after a gunman in Copenhagen killed one person and injured three others at a debate on blasphemy and free speech attended by a controversial Swedish cartoonist.

Several dozen shots were fired at the seminar and a manhunt is now under way.

Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt described it as a "politically motivated" act of terrorism.

Cartoonist Lars Vilks, who has faced death threats over his caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, was unhurt.

Police initially believed there had been two suspects, but later said they were searching for a lone gunman.

They released a photograph showing the alleged attacker apparently wearing a purple balaclava and thick puffer jacket.

The three injured were police officers.

An audio recording, obtained exclusively by the BBC, revealed the moments leading up to the attack.

One of the speakers at the debate, which took place at a cafe and concerned the limits of free speech, is suddenly interrupted by a barrage of gunshots.

Eyewitness Niels Ivar Larsen, speaking to the Associated Press news agency, said: "I heard someone firing with an automatic weapon and someone shouting.

"Police returned fire and I hid behind the bar."

The French ambassador, Francois Zimeray, was also present during the attack.

Shortly after the shooting, a message appeared on his Twitter feed saying he was still alive.

The area around the venue is under lockdown, reports the BBC's Malcolm Brabant, and police have erected cordons as they search a nearby park.

Strict security

The debate was described on a personal website of Lars Vilks as a talk on whether any limits should be placed on artistic expression or freedom of speech.

A description of the event asked whether artists could "dare" to be blasphemous in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo terror attacks by Islamist gunmen in Paris last month.

In an indication of the threat faced by the cartoonist, a note was included on the website saying there was always "strict security" whenever he spoke in public.

An organiser of Saturday's event, Helle Merete Brix, told BBC World TV it was being guarded by armed police and security agents from the Danish intelligence service, as well as Mr Vilks' own bodyguards.

She said she clearly considered the incident an attack on Mr Vilk.

Lars Vilks stoked controversy in 2007 by drawing pictures of the Prophet Muhammad dressed as a dog.

In 2010 two brothers tried to burn down the cartoonist's house in southern Sweden and were imprisoned for attempted arson.

Satirists targeting Islam have been in the spotlight since the January attacks in France, when 17 people were killed in separate incidents over a three-day period.

French President Francois Hollande said Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve would visit the Danish capital as soon as possible.

A message from the president's official Twitter feed said Mr Hollande expressed his solidarity with Denmark's prime minister.

Cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad were published by a Danish newspaper in 2005, sparking deadly riots in some Muslim countries.

Lars Vilks: A controversial career

June 1946: born in Helsingborg, Sweden

2007: Stoked controversy when he drew a series of cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad as a dog which were published in a number of Swedish papers

Sept 2007: $100,000 bounty placed on his head by then leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq

March 2010: Seven Irish citizens arrested over separate plots to kill Vilks: US woman Colleen LaRose, aka Jihad Jane, also arrested and later jailed for 10 years for conspiracy to commit murder

May 2010: Assaulted by Muslim protesters during a lecture about free speech at Uppsala University, Sweden

Sept 2011: Three men arrested in Gothenburg, Sweden, for plotting to kill Vilks

March 2013: Placed on "most wanted" list By al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula

Feb 2015: Gunmen attack event on blasphemy, art and freedom of expression organised by Vilks at the Krudttoenden café in Copenhagen, Denmark

Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 29670
Gender: male
Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #689 - Feb 15th, 2015 at 9:54am
 
cods wrote on Feb 15th, 2015 at 8:32am:
Peter Panner wrote on Feb 15th, 2015 at 8:08am:
Cods, scroll up 20cm. You'll see where you asked FD why it's ok to appease abusers but not manic terrorists? Dementia much?



oh I didnt know they chopped heads off CHarlie Hebdo employees.....

perhaps you have the link to that. Angry

I am sure you wouldnt abuse someone if you didnt have the facts at hand.... would you? Angry Angry

or are you also one of those who think people with dementia are to be abused as well.. > Shocked


Head off, shot with an AK47 or stabbed .... it's all murder .... & the sort of violence these Islamic terrorists use...

& it's that that you want to appease/give in to.
Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 ... 54
Send Topic Print