Australian Politics Forum - FREEDOM OF SPEECH..

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #690 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 10:24am

freediver wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:15am:

Time to get your pompoms out cod

my god thats pretty disgusting....how dare you....

I do not applaud killing in fact its me thats trying to find ways to avoid the killing...

because you approve of the insults... in fact you add to them...this could be right up your alley you are disgusting...I would appreciate an apology but from the like sof you I know it wont happen... so bloody superior in your own mind.. btw this happened roudn the corner where my daughter and her family are living..and where I will be some time in March....

you are probably running your hands together right now...

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

get out of my thread.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #691 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 10:29am

Gnads wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:54am:

cods wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 8:32am:

Peter Panner wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 8:08am:

Cods, scroll up 20cm. You'll see where you asked FD why it's ok to appease abusers but not manic terrorists? Dementia much?

oh I didnt know they chopped heads off CHarlie Hebdo employees.....

perhaps you have the link to that. Angry

I am sure you wouldnt abuse someone if you didnt have the facts at hand.... would you? Angry

or are you also one of those who think people with dementia are to be abused as well.. > Shocked

Head off, shot with an AK47 or stabbed .... it's all murder .... & the sort of violence these Islamic terrorists use...

& it's that that you want to appease/give in to.

all I am saying is they were WARNED..

I have never said anywhere else.. so the journos were doing their job it was their choice to be there so they deserve getting their heads chopped off...

it has got nothing to do with giving in....it was worth trying to stop a slaughter.....

you believe a slaughter is worth paying the price for..

so called Freedom of Speech...

it kind of floors me thats all..

no where and no one has freedom of speech...

have you tried using your on this forum???????

well have you?

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49091
At my desk.

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #692 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 12:11pm

cods wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 10:24am:

freediver wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 9:15am:

Time to get your pompoms out cod

my god thats pretty disgusting....how dare you....

I do not applaud killing in fact its me thats trying to find ways to avoid the killing...

because you approve of the insults... in fact you add to them...this could be right up your alley you are disgusting...I would appreciate an apology but from the like sof you I know it wont happen... so bloody superior in your own mind.. btw this happened roudn the corner where my daughter and her family are living..and where I will be some time in March....

you are probably running your hands together right now...

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

get out of my thread.

Sounds like serious business cods. I'm interested to here how you plan to do this without thinking about those "pedantic hypotheticals" you are so dismissive of. For example, do you think that rewarding terrorists for terrorism by giving them what they want will discouraging them from using terrorism to get what they want?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #693 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 12:14pm

freediver wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 12:11pm:

Sounds like serious business cods. I'm interested to here how you plan to do this without thinking about those "pedantic hypotheticals" you are so dismissive of. For example, do you think that rewarding terrorists for terrorism by giving them what they want will discouraging them from using terrorism to get what they want

I will send you over you are a pig that will fix them,.

they dont take kindly to insults and neither do I..

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49091 At my desk.	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #694 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 12:18pm See cods this is what happens when you try to "stop the killing" while refusing to put any thought into it. You end up promoting the killing. Will you wear your pompoms while you pack me off?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #695 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 12:21pm yes.. and gladly
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49091 At my desk.	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #696 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 12:24pm Do you take pride in wearing the pompoms for ISIS?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Panther Gold Member Offline My Heart beats True for the Red White & Blue... Posts: 11505 Gender:	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #697 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 1:23pm
Back to top	« Last Edit: Feb 15^th, 2015 at 1:37pm by Panther » "When the People fear government there is Tyranny; When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!" ' Live FREE or DIE! ' IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49091 At my desk.	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #698 - Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:46pm I wonder if cods sees the ISIS terror campaign as a way of getting people to be more polite.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #699 - Feb 16^th, 2015 at 5:34am

freediver wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 4:46pm:

I wonder if cods sees the ISIS terror campaign as a way of getting people to be more polite.

oh very amusing got heaps to do with FoS..

are you turning this into a lets get CODS THREAD?...

it would seem so...must be your style... if its not gangalf its cods....

says a lot actually.

cods cant do anything right as far as some people are concerned...and your one of them.. you are joining a select few I do my bets to avoid. Angry

Back to top

IP Logged

AiA Gold Member Offline Posts: 18405 Gender:	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #700 - Feb 16^th, 2015 at 5:46am cods wrote on Feb 16^th, 2015 at 5:34am: are you turning this into a lets get CODS THREAD?... you seem to be quite adept doing that yourself ...
Back to top	“Jerry, just remember: It’s not a lie … if you believe it.” George Costanza IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #701 - Feb 16^th, 2015 at 5:58am

AiA wrote on Feb 16^th, 2015 at 5:46am:

cods wrote on Feb 16^th, 2015 at 5:34am:

are you turning this into a lets get CODS THREAD?...

you seem to be quite adept doing that yourself ...

well I was right after all. Roll Eyes

out comes another one..

.you mean I shouldnt answer people....is that what you are saying???...

this is about FoS not about me... what about havinga chat with those who insist on making it about ME.. come on have a go at FD..

it was his idea to have this thread....and ever since he has done his best to turn it into a personal vendetta...

so come on... I am all for keeping a thread on topic..

btw I have also gone a long way to ignore fds simple little comments..maybe you didnt notice.

uuummmm what were you saying about FOS???

Back to top

IP Logged

Phemanderac

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3507
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #702 - Feb 16^th, 2015 at 6:57am

freediver wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 8:44am:

Phemanderac wrote on Feb 15^th, 2015 at 7:11am:

freediver wrote on Feb 14^th, 2015 at 7:22pm:

Phem is someone came on here and insisted in thread after thread that we appease neo-Nazis, would you tell us all to respect their opinion and treat them with kid gloves because that is more effective?

Why would I? That isn't what I have said previously.

It's a pretty simple concept really, I am quite surprised that a smart bloke like yourself struggles with this.

You can debate a contrary position to someone and quite clearly not need to resort to attacking them personally. Personal attacks equate to the debate being over and done with - the target of said attacks is not encouraged to expand, review or consider their thinking or thought process.

Now, as demonstrated, even with respectful debating, there are those who will hold their position with the tenacity of a pit bull. Perhaps at times, they are merely being a devils advocate and keeping the debate fires burning as it were.

There is a pretty big difference between, "respect their opinion and treat them with kid gloves because that is more effective" thinking and simply honest debating the topic with some intellectual integrity...

Do you seriously not get this? Before you answer, please note, I have noticed a pattern with your responses, whereby you re-frame that which has been said so it fits your preconceived notion - that is not intellectually honest.

So, honestly, do you seriously not get this?

Do you have a problem with me referring to cods' suggested approach as spineless appeasement? What is the politically correct term?

Thanks I think that answer clears a lot up for me...

Back to top

On the 26th of January you are all invited to celebrate little white penal day...

"They're not rules as such, more like guidelines" Pirates of the Caribbean..

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49091 At my desk.	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #703 - Feb 16^th, 2015 at 7:30am Fair enough. Lets get back on topic. Cods do you think that rewarding terrorists for acts of terrorism by giving them what they want will discourage them from using terrorism to get what they want?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Phemanderac

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3507
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #704 - Feb 16^th, 2015 at 8:34am

freediver wrote on Feb 16^th, 2015 at 7:30am:

Fair enough. Lets get back on topic. Cods do you think that rewarding terrorists for acts of terrorism by giving them what they want will discourage them from using terrorism to get what they want?

So, stopping terrorism is the topic now? I see, how silly to think the thread title had something to do with the topic.

So, in terms of stopping terrorism then, do you think that anything done currently is actually stopping terrorists from committing acts of terrorism?

What reward is Cods offering up specifically and how does the offer of these "rewards" translate to stopping (or not) terrorism?

Has the death of 17 journalists/cartoonists (in short non terrorists) in anyway shape or form reduced acts of terrorism?

It seems to me that with regard to fanatical, one eyed maniacs, nothing will actually appease them or stop them finding an excuse to behave like arseholes. But I am sure that badgering Cods for her comments will do its bit for world peace - I guess we have to be heroic where we can...

Back to top

On the 26th of January you are all invited to celebrate little white penal day...

"They're not rules as such, more like guidelines" Pirates of the Caribbean..

IP Logged