Australian Politics Forum - FREEDOM OF SPEECH..

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #720 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 3:13pm

Panther wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 2:44pm:

reamRyderX Posted on: Today at 2:44pm
cods wrote Today at 2:11pm:
.......it would be wonderful to understand why some of us are singled out to have their FREEDOM OF SPEECH actually stolen from them......

Well, I feel sorry for you. You seem to insist you are having your Freedom of Speech 'stolen from you', when that is impossible, & testament to that is you are here saying what you are, which is in of itself a pure exercise of the Freedom of Speech, of which you say is being 'stolen' from you.

If I were a Psychiatrist I would probably have a 5 syllable word describing some defining syndrome or complex, but being I'm not, all I can offer you is my sincere pity in lieu of a diagnosis.

If you are truly unhappy with your 'perceived treatment' in this forum, even though it would be a loss felt by some of us, I might suggest you tune in to a different channel so to speak, a more acceptable one to you than this, more to your own personal liking.....for your own sake -- not anyone elses.

If you so choose, that would be an exercise of another Freedom, your Freedom of Choice.

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." .......... Albert Einstei

thank you for your KIND word on input....its a shame you dont have a clue what you are talking about...only THINK you do...you are very quick to judge people...I dont think that is an asset myself but some do ..

insanity is not involved I can assure you so no need to read and worry...and or give advice.... Roll Eyes

as you say you are not a psychiatrist [ your own words] or a good follower of the boards by the look of it..

thank you.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49081 At my desk.	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #721 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:14pm Cods I have answered the same stupid question for you hundreds of times. None of the rules here restrict your freedom of speech. But you cannot answer once - what do you think would be the likely outcome of rewarding terrorists for their acts of terrorism by abandoning freedom of speech?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38770
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #722 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:23pm

freediver wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Cods I have answered the same stupid question for you hundreds of times. None of the rules here restrict your freedom of speech.

But you cannot answer once - what do you think would be the likely outcome of rewarding terrorists for their acts of terrorism by abandoning freedom of speech?

If you have, I doubt you have explained to cods why it is that you want the Muslim bashers to have freedom of speech on their patches, yet you do not allow cods the same freedom here to bash you on your patch.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #723 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:47pm

freediver wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Cods I have answered the same stupid question for you hundreds of times. None of the rules here restrict your freedom of speech.

But you cannot answer once - what do you think would be the likely outcome of rewarding terrorists for their acts of terrorism by abandoning freedom of speech?

you have blocked me from FEEDBACK so I ahve no intentions of answering a question from someone who restricts my STUPID FREEDOM OF SPEECH ON FEEDBACK.

from some who is such a hypocrite he slams the door when he cant be bothered with those he picks and chooses yet when some requests they stop drawing hideous pictures of their Messiah he cries.. FOUL how dare they ask that.. yet he uses his own POWER to thwart others FREEDOM OF SPEECH..

sorry hypocrite I dont do deals with them

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #724 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:54pm

Aussie wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:23pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:14pm:

Cods I have answered the same stupid question for you hundreds of times. None of the rules here restrict your freedom of speech.

But you cannot answer once - what do you think would be the likely outcome of rewarding terrorists for their acts of terrorism by abandoning freedom of speech?

If you have, I doubt you have explained to cods why it is that you want the Muslim bashers to have freedom of speech on their patches, yet you do not allow cods the same freedom here to bash you on your patch.

that not quite fair aussie I was not bashing him on feedback... thats why I have no idea why he shut me down and one can only suss on his PM link as well..

funny how he worries about what terrorists may do.. when hes doing the same thing ....

you have special powers fd you can shut people out as and when it suits you...in other words rob them of their freedom of speech... if I wish to join in a topic on feedback you have stopped me....

without explanation without warning... even the terrorists gave their victims that courtesy..!!!!! Angry

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49081
At my desk.

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #725 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:56pm

Quote:

yet when some requests they stop drawing hideous pictures of their Messiah he cries.. FOUL how dare they ask that..

Nothing wrong with asking cods. That's what freedom of speech is all about. The problem is slaughtering the cartoonists, and the spineless apologists who want to appease them by abandoning freedom of speech because "they are the only ones trying to stop the killing".

Why do we still need to explain this to you, after all this time?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #726 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:57pm

freediver wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:56pm:

Quote:

yet when some requests they stop drawing hideous pictures of their Messiah he cries.. FOUL how dare they ask that..

Nothing wrong with asking cods. That's what freedom of speech is all about. The problem is slaughtering the cartoonists, and the spineless apologists who want to appease them by abandoning freedom of speech because "they are the only ones trying to stop the killing".

Why do we still need to explain this to you, after all this time?

you dont....bye sunshine

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38770
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #727 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 10:06pm

freediver wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 9:56pm:

Quote:

yet when some requests they stop drawing hideous pictures of their Messiah he cries.. FOUL how dare they ask that..

Nothing wrong with asking cods. That's what freedom of speech is all about. The problem is slaughtering the cartoonists, and the spineless apologists who want to appease them by abandoning freedom of speech because "they are the only ones trying to stop the killing".

Why do we still need to explain this to you, after all this time?

You are a funny little bugger FD. You seem unable to see the direct analogy between 'slaughtering cartoonists' with your equivalent action here. Sure, you have not killed anyone, but in the figurative sense, that is exactly what you have done.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49081
At my desk.

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #728 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 10:18pm

The distinction - which I have already explained hundreds of times already - is that slaughtering cartoonists is an attack on freedom of speech. Rules on this website are not a restriction on freedom of speech.

Now, if you want to be really clever you could ask why - which is another question I have already answered hundreds of times - because freedom of speech is not a right to compel others to publish.

This is where you and cods run away. Oops, cods already has. In future rather than asking the same idiotic questions over and over again, how about you just save everyone the trouble and copy and paste this post and we can pretend we went round in the same circle again?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38770
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #729 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 10:28pm

freediver wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 10:18pm:

The distinction - which I have already explained hundreds of times already - is that slaughtering cartoonists is an attack on freedom of speech. Rules on this website are not a restriction on freedom of speech.

Now, if you want to be really clever you could ask why - which is another question I have already answered hundreds of times - because freedom of speech is not a right to compel others to publish.

This is where you and cods run away. In future rather than asking the same idiotic questions over and over again, how about you just save everyone the trouble and copy and paste this post and we can pretend we went round in the same circle again?

Yeas, we could do that....or, you could simply admit that while you want freedom of speech for people who do not post here, the freedom of speech people have here is restricted by you.....i.e. there is no such thing as freedom of speech, and this Forum is living proof of that.

One man's freedom of speech is another's deprivation of that same freedom.

You restrict freedom here with a ban button, others do it elsewhere with their ban button. Everyone is happy. Jolly.

Back to top

IP Logged

SweetLambo Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1271	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #730 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 11:42pm It's pretty easy really, if you don't like it here go post somewhere else.
Back to top	The quran was not written by allah unless allah has no knowledge of science and historical facts. No quran or prophet mohammed existed until 60 years after mohammed's death. IP Logged

it_is_the_light Gold Member Offline Christ Light Posts: 41434 The Pyramid of LIGHT Gender:	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #731 - Feb 27^th, 2015 at 11:44pm SweetLambo wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 11:42pm: It's pretty easy really, if you don't like it here go post somewhere else. many blessings yasser you could and should take your own advice yet either way be at peace namaste - : ) =
Back to top	ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ IP Logged

SweetLambo Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1271	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #732 - Feb 28^th, 2015 at 12:20am Buggeroff idiot and troll elsewhere you babbling loon.
Back to top	The quran was not written by allah unless allah has no knowledge of science and historical facts. No quran or prophet mohammed existed until 60 years after mohammed's death. IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 16615
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
Reply #733 - Feb 28^th, 2015 at 12:21am

SweetLambo wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 11:42pm:

It's pretty easy really, if you don't like it here go post somewhere else.

Or start your own forum. FoS never means you'll get that on someone else's property. Most of you may not want me in their lounge saying what I say here, I wouldn't put up with it either. But that doesn't mean you can't speak and publish what you want or take your soapbox to the street.. Then it's my choice if I listen to you and you get to say whatever you want. This forum is FD's property, just because you don't get everything you want to say here, and it's pretty bloody free, doesn't mean he is barring you from your FoS.

Set up your own forum, then you get to make the rules. FoS is about what you can say in public, this is private property. Aussie should know better.

edit: FoS is about what you can say, not where you get to say it.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH.. Reply #734 - Feb 28^th, 2015 at 7:08am it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 11:44pm: SweetLambo wrote on Feb 27^th, 2015 at 11:42pm: It's pretty easy really, if you don't like it here go post somewhere else. many blessings yasser you could and should take your own advice yet either way be at peace namaste - : ) = hilarious..
Back to top	IP Logged