Australian Politics Forum - rules for banning

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139596
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #210 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 8:11am

Super Nova wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 11:41pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 8:30pm:

Neferti wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 8:22pm:

ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. I did NOT post anything. Should anyone want to know who
George/Jovial Monk is, all they have to do is Google "Xxxxxx Xxxx".

Please join me in the Women's Area. ONLY rules. NO POLITICS.

Captured. Firstly, you are lying. I have what you originally posted, and lying about it only exacerbates your problem.

Secondly. You have again breached the Privacy Rules in that Post. You have just informed everyone, in breach of the Rule, how they can stalk St George.

Quote:

Privacy
OzPolitic values the privacy of all members. Do not post personal information about other members without their explicit permission. This includes the contents of personal messages and emails, photos, names, IP addresses, phone numbers, locations etc. This includes information that can be found online and instructions on how to find information about specific members. Such behaviour is considered stalking.

Fact is.....it was the product of exactly that search you originally posted ~ and then 31 minutes later, deleted.

GMods?

Gee aussie, I guess we will have to take you word for it. Anyone can type text in a quote box and say "I captured it".

Can you share a screenshot so we know it is for real.

I saw that post too.

It was up for about 3 or 4 minutes, and then it was changed to 'Go Away'.

Aussie is telling the truth.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: rules for banning
Reply #211 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 8:53am

Neferti wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 9:14pm:

I want it to be known to ALL Members that I have NOT divulged anybody's details, as Aussie is alluding to. Aussie is a man with a mission and will LIE his head off to attain that.

PLEASE check my last 25 posts. I have NOT mentioned anybody's name, email address, web site or anything else.

Aussie is a LIAR and trying to get me banned.

we cannot check something you have altered....

but the point is neferti..you should not go down this road in the first place.. Angry

.. I am shocked at the way you speak to people on here yep myself included if you ever want respect... then I will tell you this is not the way to earn it..shame..

Back to top

IP Logged

The Mole Gold Member Offline http://www.ozpolitic .co/album/forum-atta chments/y Posts: 1499 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #212 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 9:46am Neferti has form for posting details of a personal nature and we have all seen that - I have no doubt at all that Aussie is being truthful.
Back to top	"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave" IP Logged

mantra Gold Member Offline ozpolitic.com Posts: 10750 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #213 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 9:55am She denies that the Nefertiti sock was hers.
Back to top	IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: rules for banning
Reply #214 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 10:11am

I cant see the point of doing it??...I mean the internet is way out of line for some of these people...they just have no line they cannot cross....she would be better to ignore the person who upsets her the most..its what I try to do...if you cannot talk reasonable then dont talk at all..

if you have to edit yourself.. then you have a problem thats for sure... Shocked

Back to top

IP Logged

The Mole Gold Member Offline http://www.ozpolitic .co/album/forum-atta chments/y Posts: 1499 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #215 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 10:29am mantra wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 9:55am: She denies that the Nefertiti sock was hers. Nef is a big bloke and has an awful big mouth so I'm sure he can tell us-this was posted under the Neferti account-not a sock. Deletion of facts and denial does not a truth teller make,
Back to top	"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave" IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #216 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 10:30am

cods wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 10:11am:

I cant see the point of doing it??...I mean the internet is way out of line for some of these people...they just have no line they cannot cross....she would be better to ignore the person who upsets her the most..its what I try to do...if you cannot talk reasonable then dont talk at all..

if you have to edit yourself.. then you have a problem thats for sure... Shocked

Good advice Cods.

Back to top

"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave"

IP Logged

St George of the Garden Gold Member Offline http://tinyurl.com/n 3o8m2x Posts: 9809 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #217 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 11:55am When I get upset I sometimes write an abusive post ripping the troll who upset me to shreds. . .I then hit back arrow. Very therapeutic with some of the trolls about these days.
Back to top	I want Muso as GMod. Bring back Muso! IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #218 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:00pm

This is a method I have used in the past, to get rid of negative stuff-- you write on a piece of paper what ever it was that upset you-- you then burn that piece of paper outside preferably, watch the smoke rise from the paper as it burns , your problem is lifted away by the breeze ..to be gone forever- sounds a bit silly but it works.. no don't thank me Smiley

Back to top

"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave"

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #219 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:41pm

Super Nova wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 11:41pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 8:30pm:

Neferti wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 8:22pm:

ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. I did NOT post anything. Should anyone want to know who
George/Jovial Monk is, all they have to do is Google "Xxxxxx Xxxx".

Please join me in the Women's Area. ONLY rules. NO POLITICS.

Captured. Firstly, you are lying. I have what you originally posted, and lying about it only exacerbates your problem.

Secondly. You have again breached the Privacy Rules in that Post. You have just informed everyone, in breach of the Rule, how they can stalk St George.

Quote:

Privacy
OzPolitic values the privacy of all members. Do not post personal information about other members without their explicit permission. This includes the contents of personal messages and emails, photos, names, IP addresses, phone numbers, locations etc. This includes information that can be found online and instructions on how to find information about specific members. Such behaviour is considered stalking.

Fact is.....it was the product of exactly that search you originally posted ~ and then 31 minutes later, deleted.

GMods?

Gee aussie, I guess we will have to take you word for it. Anyone can type text in a quote box and say "I captured it".

Can you share a screenshot so we know it is for real.

The person that Aussie pays for screen shots is busy.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

St George of the Garden Gold Member Offline http://tinyurl.com/n 3o8m2x Posts: 9809 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #220 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 2:44pm AiA still has the stolen artwork as his avatar. That should be removed.
Back to top	I want Muso as GMod. Bring back Muso! IP Logged

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: rules for banning Reply #221 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:01pm St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 2:44pm: AiA still has the stolen artwork as his avatar. That should be removed. I havent seen him today maybe he is drawing one of his own..lolol.. does he do pencils?
Back to top	IP Logged

Super Nova

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 3076
Everywhere
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #222 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:08pm

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:41pm:

The person that Aussie pays for screen shots is busy.

Yes. Aussie has an issue with screenshots and evidence. He will deny sending me a PM on this day. This is an example for all at Ozpol how reliable screenshots are.

This is a PM from Aussie.

Disclaimer: the PM below is a real PM that has been altered and is provided to demonstrate that evidence of any kind that is electronically presented on the web cannot be trusted.

Back to top

Aussie_Ozpol_PM_1.png (18 KB | 42 )

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: rules for banning
Reply #223 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:17pm

Super Nova wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:41pm:

The person that Aussie pays for screen shots is busy.

Yes. Aussie has an issue with screenshots and evidence. He will deny sending me a PM on this day. This is an example for all at Ozpol how reliable screenshots are.

This is a PM from Aussie.

Disclaimer: the PM below is a real PM that has been altered and is provided to demonstrate that evidence of any kind that is electronically presented on the web cannot be trusted.

I do worry about self editing....

aussie has someone else who has seen said posts..

and to put something like that up in ozpol is surely breaking the rules....

I did complain a while ago about someone being able to alter posts other than their own.. and was under the impression they couldnt do so...

why did you use aussie for this show and tell??...

why not one from skippy... or AiA....I am sure they would laugh themselves silly about it. Angry

Back to top

IP Logged

Super Nova

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 3076
Everywhere
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #224 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:38pm

cods wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:17pm:

I do worry about self editing....

aussie has someone else who has seen said posts..

and to put something like that up in ozpol is surely breaking the rules....

I did complain a while ago about someone being able to alter posts other than their own.. and was under the impression they couldnt do so...

why did you use aussie for this show and tell??...

why not one from skippy... or AiA....I am sure they would laugh themselves silly about it. Angry

" and to put something like that up in ozpol is surely breaking the rules...."

That would be a surprise if a community service statement breaks the rules.

"why did you use aussie for this show and tell??..."

because that was the example I had at hand. Also aussie was the one lead the charge and accusations. BO denies it. We see no evidence. The rules here are such that it is for the mods to decide in the smoky back rooms so I raise a concern that they should not take electronic evidence as gospel.

"why not one from skippy... or AiA....I am sure they would laugh themselves silly about it"

I am sure they would. I wonder if Aussie will do the same.

Have a nice day.

Back to top

IP Logged