Australian Politics Forum - rules for banning

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38860
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #225 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:40pm

Super Nova wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:38pm:

cods wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:17pm:

I do worry about self editing....

aussie has someone else who has seen said posts..

and to put something like that up in ozpol is surely breaking the rules....

I did complain a while ago about someone being able to alter posts other than their own.. and was under the impression they couldnt do so...

why did you use aussie for this show and tell??...

why not one from skippy... or AiA....I am sure they would laugh themselves silly about it. Angry

" and to put something like that up in ozpol is surely breaking the rules...."

That would be a surprise if a community service statement breaks the rules.

"why did you use aussie for this show and tell??..."

because that was the example I had at hand. Also aussie was the one lead the charge and accusations. BO denies it. We see no evidence. The rules here are such that it is for the mods to decide in the smoky back rooms so I raise a concern that they should not take electronic evidence as gospel.

"why not one from skippy... or AiA....I am sure they would laugh themselves silly about it"

I am sure they would. I wonder if Aussie will do the same.

Have a nice day.

Are you alleging that is a real PM from me, containing words I actually typed, but to which you have added your own words?

Back to top

IP Logged

The Mole Gold Member Offline http://www.ozpolitic .co/album/forum-atta chments/y Posts: 1499 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #226 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:54pm SN is a troll and loves to taunt posters..its a photoshop Aussie..forget it.
Back to top	"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave" IP Logged

St George of the Garden

Gold Member

Offline

http://tinyurl.com/n
3o8m2x

Posts: 9809
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #227 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:18pm

Super Nova wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:41pm:

The person that Aussie pays for screen shots is busy.

Yes. Aussie has an issue with screenshots and evidence. He will deny sending me a PM on this day. This is an example for all at Ozpol how reliable screenshots are.

This is a PM from Aussie.

Disclaimer: the PM below is a real PM that has been altered and is provided to demonstrate that evidence of any kind that is electronically presented on the web cannot be trusted.

That one of your many, many forged screen shots, SN? You have no credibility left at all.

This SN character used a picture of one of Aussie’s properties as avatar, turned my artwork into something disgusting and offensive and routinely posted forged screenshots to “prove” something derogatory about Aussie.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:28pm by St George of the Garden »

I want Muso as GMod. Bring back Muso!

Friends of the National Broadband Network

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #228 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:23pm

St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:18pm:

Super Nova wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:41pm:

The person that Aussie pays for screen shots is busy.

Yes. Aussie has an issue with screenshots and evidence. He will deny sending me a PM on this day. This is an example for all at Ozpol how reliable screenshots are.

This is a PM from Aussie.

Disclaimer: the PM below is a real PM that has been altered and is provided to demonstrate that evidence of any kind that is electronically presented on the web cannot be trusted.

That one of your many, many forged screen shots, SN? You have no credibility left at all.

Speaking of screen shots how about one of your own with your proof of copyright? All we have is your word, hardly convincing. Roll Eyes

it hasn't expired has it? Grin

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: rules for banning
Reply #229 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:27pm

St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:18pm:

Super Nova wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:41pm:

The person that Aussie pays for screen shots is busy.

Yes. Aussie has an issue with screenshots and evidence. He will deny sending me a PM on this day. This is an example for all at Ozpol how reliable screenshots are.

This is a PM from Aussie.

Disclaimer: the PM below is a real PM that has been altered and is provided to demonstrate that evidence of any kind that is electronically presented on the web cannot be trusted.

That one of your many, many forged screen shots, SN? You have no credibility left at all.

judging by this I doubt he ever had any... Roll Eyes

sad really I am not sure what point he is trying to prove....but I am sure most on here take not the slightest notice of him...he just makes all those who come from PA look worse than we have been told..

so it kind of works against them... well for me anyway..

Back to top

IP Logged

St George of the Garden Gold Member Offline http://tinyurl.com/n 3o8m2x Posts: 9809 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #230 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:32pm Must admit, cods, that when I saw Naffy was Mod of Womens Issues I laughed hysterically!
Back to top	I want Muso as GMod. Bring back Muso! IP Logged

The Mole Gold Member Offline http://www.ozpolitic .co/album/forum-atta chments/y Posts: 1499 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #231 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:32pm St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:32pm: Must admit, cods, that when I saw Naffy was Mod of Womens Issues I laughed hysterically! That was a LOL moment.
Back to top	"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave" IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #232 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:33pm

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 4:14pm:

cods wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 4:07pm:

St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

Just to let people know the image of a monk in a red habit AiA is using as an avatar ATM is my copyrighted artwork stolen by AiA.

Can only think he is trying to stir trouble or something. Pretty low behavior in my book.

I am going to leave it there.

I am not sure how we are expected to know that geo
or a mod would know it for that matter.
I would think you would need to report it..

isnt stealing agin the law???... Roll Eyes

even on the web.

AiA knows it. Anyone/everyone who has been at PA knows it. It was the centre of controversy there for ages, and has now been lifted from there by AiA and brought here. It is a quite deliberate and specifically aimed bait, targetted straight at St George.

Saved.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #233 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:33pm

cods wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:27pm:

St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:18pm:

Super Nova wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:41pm:

The person that Aussie pays for screen shots is busy.

Yes. Aussie has an issue with screenshots and evidence. He will deny sending me a PM on this day. This is an example for all at Ozpol how reliable screenshots are.

This is a PM from Aussie.

Disclaimer: the PM below is a real PM that has been altered and is provided to demonstrate that evidence of any kind that is electronically presented on the web cannot be trusted.

That one of your many, many forged screen shots, SN? You have no credibility left at all.

judging by this I doubt he ever had any... Roll Eyes

sad really I am not sure what point he is trying to prove....but I am sure most on here take not the slightest notice of him...he just makes all those who come from PA look worse than we have been told..

so it kind of works against them... well for me anyway..

Saved.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

St George of the Garden

Gold Member

Offline

http://tinyurl.com/n
3o8m2x

Posts: 9809
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #234 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:38pm

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:33pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 4:14pm:

cods wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 4:07pm:

St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

Just to let people know the image of a monk in a red habit AiA is using as an avatar ATM is my copyrighted artwork stolen by AiA.

Can only think he is trying to stir trouble or something. Pretty low behavior in my book.

I am going to leave it there.

I am not sure how we are expected to know that geo
or a mod would know it for that matter.
I would think you would need to report it..

isnt stealing agin the law???... Roll Eyes

even on the web.

AiA knows it. Anyone/everyone who has been at PA knows it. It was the centre of controversy there for ages, and has now been lifted from there by AiA and brought here. It is a quite deliberate and specifically aimed bait, targetted straight at St George.

Saved.

Goodoh, wouldn’t want the truth to be lost, eh, Skippy the Dud Kangaroo?

Back to top

I want Muso as GMod. Bring back Muso!

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #235 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:41pm

mods could we have some clarification please Re the above posts. I was under the impression in order to stop the slanging match that was going on a rule was being enforced that posters were not to discuss or mention " that other forum" as it only incites arguments. Posters were to be suspended for doing so. It is clear both the above posters are trying to start more arguments yet again by referring to " that other forum". An equal playing field would be appreciated, thanks.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #236 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:45pm

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:41pm:

mods could we have some clarification please Re the above posts. I was under the impression in order to stop the slanging match that was going on a rule was being enforced that posters were not to discuss or mention " that other forum" as it only incites arguments. Posters were to be suspended for doing so. It is clear both the above posters are trying to start more arguments yet again by referring to " that other forum". An equal playing field would be appreciated, thanks.

You have that other forum so clearly visible in your signature..that is also against rules. Cool

Back to top

"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave"

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38860
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #237 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:46pm

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:41pm:

mods could we have some clarification please Re the above posts. I was under the impression in order to stop the slanging match that was going on a rule was being enforced that posters were not to discuss or mention " that other forum" as it only incites arguments. Posters were to be suspended for doing so. It is clear both the above posters are trying to start more arguments yet again by referring to " that other forum". An equal playing field would be appreciated, thanks.

Really? I have never seen any such Rule even discussed, let alone posted as operative.

Let's see some proof, skippy.

Back to top

IP Logged

St George of the Garden Gold Member Offline http://tinyurl.com/n 3o8m2x Posts: 9809 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #238 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:46pm Hmmmm considering all the trolls from PA prevented me from taking over the modship of Food, belittled my effort to start the Fermentations board and now AiA and SN are dragging the crap from the septic tank into OzPol it would be good to have that rule applied!
Back to top	I want Muso as GMod. Bring back Muso! IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #239 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:48pm

St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:46pm:

Hmmmm considering all the trolls from PA prevented me from taking over the modship of Food, belittled my effort to start the Fermentations board and now AiA and SN are dragging the crap from the septic tank into OzPol it would be good to have that rule applied!

Definitely-- they only have 4 posters and they are all here. Trolling and flaming.

Back to top

"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave"

IP Logged