Australian Politics Forum - rules for banning

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: rules for banning
Reply #255 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:18pm

why is discussion a No No??.. I dont get it.. what fighting are they talking about...to disagree is not what I call fighting...

who are the ones that turn to abuse and insults.....??

thats more the point....

if people are discussing others behavior isnt that what forums are for???...

and shouldnt FD know about behavor??? he can read it for himself and therefore judge for himself who is the baddie...I am sure FD doesnt need another mod to protect him from all these naughty members of ozpol Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

The Mole Gold Member Offline http://www.ozpolitic .co/album/forum-atta chments/y Posts: 1499 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #256 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:20pm St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:16pm: People that brought PA crap here: skippy, SN and AiA. Thanks for clearing that up Geore..I think whoever kicked this off should be suspended first- and I will see you all when ever .
Back to top	"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave" IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #257 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:21pm

cods wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:18pm:

why is discussion a No No??.. I dont get it.. what fighting are they talking about...to disagree is not what I call fighting...

who are the ones that turn to abuse and insults.....??

thats more the point....

if people are discussing others behavior isnt that what forums are for???...

and shouldnt FD know about behavor??? he can read it for himself and therefore judge for himself who is the baddie...I am sure FD doesnt need another mod to protect him from all these naughty members of ozpol Roll Eyes

You have a point.

Back to top

"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave"

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #258 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:23pm

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:41pm:

mods could we have some clarification please Re the above posts. I was under the impression in order to stop the slanging match that was going on a rule was being enforced that posters were not to discuss or mention " that other forum" as it only incites arguments. Posters were to be suspended for doing so. It is clear both the above posters are trying to start more arguments yet again by referring to " that other forum". An equal playing field would be appreciated, thanks.

Bump, this got lost among gangs abuse.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

The Mole Gold Member Offline http://www.ozpolitic .co/album/forum-atta chments/y Posts: 1499 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #259 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:24pm That would mean suspension for everyone on this thread..if you read through. Everyone is talking about PA.
Back to top	"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave" IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #260 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:26pm

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:41pm:

mods could we have some clarification please Re the above posts. I was under the impression in order to stop the slanging match that was going on a rule was being enforced that posters were not to discuss or mention " that other forum" as it only incites arguments. Posters were to be suspended for doing so. It is clear both the above posters are trying to start more arguments yet again by referring to " that other forum". An equal playing field would be appreciated, thanks.

Back to top

"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave"

IP Logged

The Mole Gold Member Offline http://www.ozpolitic .co/album/forum-atta chments/y Posts: 1499 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #261 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:28pm mantra wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 9:55am: She denies that the Nefertiti sock was hers.
Back to top	"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave" IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38860
Gender: male

Re: rules for banning
Reply #262 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:28pm

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:23pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:41pm:

mods could we have some clarification please Re the above posts. I was under the impression in order to stop the slanging match that was going on a rule was being enforced that posters were not to discuss or mention " that other forum" as it only incites arguments. Posters were to be suspended for doing so. It is clear both the above posters are trying to start more arguments yet again by referring to " that other forum". An equal playing field would be appreciated, thanks.

Bump, this got lost among gangs abuse.

And you still have not provided the link which establishes that. In fact, you have produced a which establishes the exact opposite.

Back to top

IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #263 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:28pm

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:23pm:

St George of the Garden wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:18pm:

Super Nova wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 1:41pm:

The person that Aussie pays for screen shots is busy.

Yes. Aussie has an issue with screenshots and evidence. He will deny sending me a PM on this day. This is an example for all at Ozpol how reliable screenshots are.

This is a PM from Aussie.

Disclaimer: the PM below is a real PM that has been altered and is provided to demonstrate that evidence of any kind that is electronically presented on the web cannot be trusted.

That one of your many, many forged screen shots, SN? You have no credibility left at all.

Speaking of screen shots how about one of your own with your proof of copyright? All we have is your word, hardly convincing. Roll Eyes

it hasn't expired has it? Grin

saved

Back to top

"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave"

IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #264 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:29pm

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:49pm:

The Mole wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:45pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:41pm:

mods could we have some clarification please Re the above posts. I was under the impression in order to stop the slanging match that was going on a rule was being enforced that posters were not to discuss or mention " that other forum" as it only incites arguments. Posters were to be suspended for doing so. It is clear both the above posters are trying to start more arguments yet again by referring to " that other forum". An equal playing field would be appreciated, thanks.

You have that other forum so clearly visible in your signature..that is also against rules. Cool

FD owns the forum, speak to him. Grin

Annie made it clear last time you were all banned discussing " that other place" you all keep trying to drag up was going to be a suspend-able offence. Playing the " doh I don't know card " will not get you far.
Maybe I need to PM her with this , thanks for the help,AG. Shocked

saved

Back to top

"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave"

IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #265 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:33pm

Super Nova wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 11:41pm:

Aussie wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 8:30pm:

Neferti wrote on Feb 9^th, 2015 at 8:22pm:

ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. I did NOT post anything. Should anyone want to know who
George/Jovial Monk is, all they have to do is Google "Xxxxxx Xxxx".

Please join me in the Women's Area. ONLY rules. NO POLITICS.

Captured. Firstly, you are lying. I have what you originally posted, and lying about it only exacerbates your problem.

Secondly. You have again breached the Privacy Rules in that Post. You have just informed everyone, in breach of the Rule, how they can stalk St George.

Quote:

Privacy
OzPolitic values the privacy of all members. Do not post personal information about other members without their explicit permission. This includes the contents of personal messages and emails, photos, names, IP addresses, phone numbers, locations etc. This includes information that can be found online and instructions on how to find information about specific members. Such behaviour is considered stalking.

Fact is.....it was the product of exactly that search you originally posted ~ and then 31 minutes later, deleted.

GMods?

Gee aussie, I guess we will have to take you word for it. Anyone can type text in a quote box and say "I captured it".

Can you share a screenshot so we know it is for real.

saved

Back to top

"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave"

IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #266 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:33pm

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:53pm:

The Mole wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:50pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:49pm:

The Mole wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:45pm:

skippy. wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 4:41pm:

mods could we have some clarification please Re the above posts. I was under the impression in order to stop the slanging match that was going on a rule was being enforced that posters were not to discuss or mention " that other forum" as it only incites arguments. Posters were to be suspended for doing so. It is clear both the above posters are trying to start more arguments yet again by referring to " that other forum". An equal playing field would be appreciated, thanks.

You have that other forum so clearly visible in your signature..that is also against rules. Cool

FD owns the forum. Grin

it is still against the rules.

Yes dear, PM him and complain his own forum is not allowed to be advertised here. Grin

saved

Back to top

"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave"

IP Logged

mantra Gold Member Offline ozpolitic.com Posts: 10750 Gender:	Re: rules for banning Reply #267 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:38pm The Mole wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:28pm: mantra wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 9:55am: She denies that the Nefertiti sock was hers. I wasn't discussing the other board. Don't drag me into this crap.
Back to top	IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #268 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:39pm

Now mods I hope that while your banning me, that you take a look at PA trolls who only come here to cause trouble and as you can see its sprung up again..the ADMIN of PA has a reference to PA in his sig ( against rules ) which I find offensive, he is dobbing like a child- AiA is using Georges avatar , a deliberate troll and is using the word c--t in his Sig, also against forum rules.

The new women's board kicked off today as just a place for the PA mod ( Neferti) to ridicule ( with impunity) anyone who comes near that board. So lets take a look at the broader picture here, PA trolls will always be trouble...

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:45pm by The Mole »

"Why Johnny Ringo, you look like someone just walked over your grave"

IP Logged

The Mole

Gold Member

Offline

http://www.ozpolitic
.co/album/forum-atta
chments/y

Posts: 1499
Gender: female

Re: rules for banning
Reply #269 - Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:40pm

mantra wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:38pm:

The Mole wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 5:28pm:

mantra wrote on Feb 10^th, 2015 at 9:55am:

She denies that the Nefertiti sock was hers.