Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
by-election in Queensland? WTF? (Read 727 times)
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
by-election in Queensland? WTF?
Feb 4th, 2015 at 6:30am
 
Quote:
Queensland election 2015: Ferny Grove could be headed to by-election


While Queensland still waits on an answer about who will be leading its government for the next term, political eyes have turned to Ferny Grove, where voters could be headed back to the polls sooner than they thought.

The Electoral Commission Queensland spent all Tuesday morning dealing with media enquiries after The Courier Mail reported the Palmer United candidate in the north-west seat was an alleged undischarged bankrupt.

Under the Parliament of Queensland legislation, a person found to be an undischarged bankrupt is unable to stand for office.

The LNP is expected to win 42 seats and Labor 44 including Ferny Grove. If the seat was to fall to the LNP, however, it would be in an improved bargaining position with cross-bench MPs and could even form a government.
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Re: by-election in Queensland? WTF?
Reply #1 - Feb 4th, 2015 at 6:31am
 
interesting times folks..

the Media will be whipping themselves into a frenzied orgy baying for blood...
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Re: by-election in Queensland? WTF?
Reply #2 - Feb 4th, 2015 at 6:42am
 
how's this for an outcome...

a minority Government in QLD with Pauline Hanson holding the Balance of power???

dear lord...  Shocked

Grin
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: by-election in Queensland? WTF?
Reply #3 - Feb 4th, 2015 at 10:18am
 
PUP don't screen their candidates too well evidently.

The Govt should sue PUP for the cost of the Byelection.

Will Labor have the testicular fortitude?  Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139862
Gender: male
Re: by-election in Queensland? WTF?
Reply #4 - Feb 4th, 2015 at 10:22am
 
Swagman wrote on Feb 4th, 2015 at 10:18am:
PUP don't screen their candidates too well evidently.



Nor do the Liberal Party.

Section 44 of the Australian Constitution is clear when it says:

44. Any person who -

(i.) Is under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power: or ...

... shall be incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a senator or a member of the House of Representatives.



...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26480
Gender: male
Re: by-election in Queensland? WTF?
Reply #5 - Feb 4th, 2015 at 12:44pm
 
Swagman wrote on Feb 4th, 2015 at 10:18am:
PUP don't screen their candidates too well evidently.

The Govt should sue PUP for the cost of the Byelection.

Will Labor have the testicular fortitude?  Cheesy


Are you kidding? The Labor leader hasn't got the balls!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Swagman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male
Re: by-election in Queensland? WTF?
Reply #6 - Feb 4th, 2015 at 12:58pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 4th, 2015 at 10:22am:
Section 44 of the Australian Constitution is clear when it says:

44. Any person who -

(i.) Is under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power


Interesting....... so all the Leftist politicians that sell their bums to the UN and the Climate Church should be turfed out huh?  Cheesy

Don't all politicians swear allegiance, obedience, or adherence to Queen Bess?  Cheesy

We are an anarchy and we didn't know it?  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139862
Gender: male
Re: by-election in Queensland? WTF?
Reply #7 - Feb 4th, 2015 at 1:05pm
 
Swagman wrote on Feb 4th, 2015 at 12:58pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 4th, 2015 at 10:22am:
Section 44 of the Australian Constitution is clear when it says:

44. Any person who -

(i.) Is under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power


Don't all politicians swear allegiance, obedience, or adherence to Queen Bess? 





Queen Elizabeth is the Queen of Australia.

"The Queen's relationship to Australia is unique. In all her duties, she speaks and acts as Queen of Australia, and not as Queen of the United Kingdom."

http://www.royal.gov.uk/monarchandcommonwealth/australia/australia.aspx
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: by-election in Queensland? WTF?
Reply #8 - Feb 4th, 2015 at 1:44pm
 
A byelection in Ferny Grove is unlikely. The ineligible candidate would be excluded from the count and the remaining preferences would be allocated as normal.

Legal precedent - Sykes v Cleary (paragraph 31):
Quote:
a primary vote for an unqualified candidate does not destroy the voter’s indication of his or her subsequent preferences… Although an indication of a voter’s preference for an unqualified candidate is a nullity and the indication of preference for that candidate cannot be treated as effective, the ballot paper is not informal. It was held (in re Wood) that “the vote is valid except to the extent that the want of qualification makes the particular indication of preference a nullity” and that there is no reason for disregarding the other indications of the voter’s preference

Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print