Amadd wrote on Apr 5^th, 2015 at 8:40pm:

It takes a special person like you to be a complete f Vcking drongo.  But you do leap to be of service, so that's nice.

Soren wrote on Apr 4^th, 2015 at 12:14pm:


In the wider universe none.

If every human on the planet were to disappear tomorrow the world wouldn't notice.

If every ant went extinct the planet will be in turmoil, a biological domino effect would see a mass extinction of other animal and plant species dependant on ants for survival.

Ants are more important to the survival of the planet than humans.

Why do you think modern dating methods are unreliable?

Yadda wrote on Apr 7^th, 2015 at 7:09pm:



Any with actual evidence of the issue and not just creationist rubbish?

I also suspect it will be instances where someone tries to extrapolate a carbon dating method for a time scale too large for it to work.

Stratos wrote on Apr 7^th, 2015 at 8:43pm:



Stratos,

Ah,   ....so i have to be an accredited, published scientist, before anything i say/suggest, can be said to have any possible validity - in the real world.




QUESTION;
How many accredited, published scientists do you know, who are willing to risk 'killing' their PROFESSIONAL careers, by contradicting established, accepted, 'scientific' 'facts' ?

To do such a thing, would be like like an Anglican priest recanting, and then wanting to challenge/abolish church doctrines.

It would be heresy!

LOL


Dictionary;
heresy = =
1 belief or opinion contrary to orthodox religious (especially Christian) doctrine.
2 opinion profoundly at odds with what is generally accepted.


Stratos,

You do realise, that the 'science community' is a 'religious' 'church' too, don't you ?      

And that the 'science community' also, in effect, has its own 'high priests' !!



QUESTION;
Can't you see, these people [scientists] who are unwilling to challenge current 'science community' orthodoxy, because it may be a 'bad career move', have no more credibility, than lying, self-serving career politicians ?

Such people [career focused 'scientists'] are not scientists.

They are self-serving betrayers of truth.



Google;



Google;



Scientist, science ?!!!

Ha!!

Phooey!

What many of them are engaged in, is not science.

True scientific principle, requires not only

"the intellectual and practical activity.......[of] observation and experiment"

,        ....but also a respect for truth, and the courage to denounce falsehood.

Doesn't it ?





.





Stratos,

IMO, the 'science' that people like you 'believe in', is like the ISLAM that people like you believe in.

---------- >

"ISLAM is peace."

Always has been, always will be.            



e.g.
Ask a spokeman for the moslem community, in Australia, and he will insist that; "Peace summarises everything in Islam"

Quote:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-01-19/darwins-muslim-community-tackles-discrimin...



EXAMPLE - of moslems promoting ISLAM 'peace' in Australia.....

------------- >

IMAGE....

"Mr Yunus has been encouraging peaceful community bridging since starting his post as Darwin's Islamic leader in 2014."

Mr Yunus is a moslem.

Mr Yunus is a follower of ISLAM.

Yadda wrote on Apr 8^th, 2015 at 8:19am:



Yes it does, take gastric ulcers. It was once thought that gastric ulcers had nothing to do with bacteria until a scientist come along with careful observations (and a little self-experimentation) to prove that was incorrect. If the earth is truly 6000 years old, science would have zero problems accepting it, as loing as the evidence was there.

Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 8^th, 2015 at 4:45pm:


Yeah, maybe I'm just too ignorant to translate it into another language, because in English it seems that god assumes the world to be 6000-7000yrs old ....and flat!  What a numbscull!!