polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2015 at 10:57pm:


Yeah the demand for halal certification for a product that is already halal is just so huge. Must pay muslim tax must pay now dammit. They all just think that up and they then contact the local mussey tax office and say please send out the halal boys or all the gullible muslims out there will boycott my products.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2015 at 10:59pm:


There are plenty or retarded children in the world. By your standards that's a market, lets place a religious tax on them when they buy nappies or food.

That's a demographic not a market and that would be a rort and criminal. Shock horror ethics are coming into play.

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2015 at 10:59pm:


Whats behind closed doors actually ? It is basic math something you are having trouble grasping. Islamist's tell billions of gullible people only eat halal certified food. Then companies that are now international companies are forced to halal certify their food and pay a tax so the numbskulls will buy their food.

Note the money flow at this stage(for the thick)

Unfortunately this scam then applies in non muslim countries where they then set up shop and scream you need to be certified in this country too. Or we'll tell everyone you are not certified here.

Basic math try it sometime we never came down in the last shower here mate.

Go watch the Godfather Series and get back to us. It is just extortion pure and simple. There is no need for Halal certification at all except the stand over tactics of islam pure and simple.

I doubt you will understand given the incoherent responses received so far.

SweetLambo wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2015 at 11:11pm:


market for what?

You're making less and less sense. A demographic on its own is not a market - a demographic with a particular demand in the products they buy is a market. Whether they are retarded or not makes no difference.

SweetLambo wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2015 at 11:11pm:


as the person who brought it up, I think its up to you to explain that.

Adamant wrote on Feb 24^th, 2015 at 10:45am:


Actually I'd rather stick to the topic - you know like you and Mo constantly accuse me of not wanting to do?

Lets get back to milk shall we adam? - in particular this alleged "admission" by me that it was a rort. I'm genuinely interested in how I could have done this when all I've done in this thread is try and get an explanation from you as to how it is a rort.

Is lying about what I said some cunning strategy to avoid the question I keep asking you adam?