polite_gandalf wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2015 at 9:00am:


Abuse like a Global Moderator accusing people of having hissy fits bringing the entire forum down in front of everyone else ?

If you have proof of your stupid accusation post it or grow up. Until then keep your childish accusations to yourself.

Since you are in a banning mood why don't you ban your pet karnel troll or your hot breath or gregorypeccary. Then you would at least be consistent.

Karnal wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2015 at 10:25pm:


You wouldn't have the brains all you can do is make useless posts.

Quote:


No two lies are exactly the same Gandalf. My point is that the truth does matter, and your dedicated efforts to misrepresent this are rather disturbing.

Do Muslims value the truth Gandalf?

Quote:


You doing what Muslims do is evidence of Muslims doing what Muslims do.

Quote:


it depends on what their death cult leader says.

freediver wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2015 at 10:00am:


I support the truth that disagreement over what constitutes a line doesn't change the fact that this was a story about muslims showing goodwill towards jews.

Gee how pathetic can you get FD? Trying to paint this story as 'based on lies' by - of all things - quibbling over what is defined by a line.

A line or a ring? Stupid or mendacious? Sometimes a question is just a question.

And, G, you can never counter such awe-inspiring rhetoric from the truth-loving FD.

Never ever.

freediver wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2015 at 2:06pm:


And yet you keep banging on about it - as if you can't understand that this particular point of contention is not only completely irrelevant to the authenticity of the story, but is the most extraordinary case of petty-mindedness and smacks of desperation.

If the story really was as deceitful and relied so heavily on lies as you make out, then it makes no sense to make such a song and dance over this silly little irrelevancy. You would be focusing on really sinister lies that demonstrates the conspiracy campaign of deceit you are so desperate to convince us of.

freediver wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2015 at 2:06pm:


It hasn't actually occurred to you that no one except you and, for a fleeting moment Soren, disputes the claim that there were hundreds of muslims. One Norwegian journalist tweeted that even the most muslim critical were citing 200-300, which I believe I quoted earlier.

Interesting that this is one of the horrendously sinister lies you are using to justify your claim that this story is an outrageous organised muslim plot to conceal the threat of Islam - and that the reporting of these "lies" goes, in your words, "beyond regular journalistic incompetence". Interesting that what you call a lie (and then dress it up so enthusiastically to become a most sinister lie) is a claim that "there is no way to know for sure". FD - redefining the definition of lying - if a muslim makes a claim that can't be proven - it is not only assumed to be wrong, but it is maliciously and deliberately so.

FD I just hope in your more reflective moments you can appreciate the absurdly tenuous basis this great sinister plot of yours is built on. The over-the-top rhetoric about grand plots by muslims in cahoots with western journalists to mendaciously cover up the atrocities of muslims - and what does it come down to? Quibbling over what constitutes a line, and accusing muslims of not being able to prove their claim that hundreds of muslims turned up. Thats literally it FD - this is literally the extent of the "lies" that makes this such a sinister plot of taqqiya. But please, remind me if there's anything else I've forgotton. Maybe you can fall back on your old favourite - "deferring to common sense" and "thinking for yourself". That usually works.

Talk about emperors clothes. 

Soren wrote on Apr 4^th, 2015 at 3:35pm:


You keep making these claims, Soren yet many Muslims disagree with you about them.  I wonder therefore if you know really what you're talking about.